Analysis Of Better World Books

678 Words2 Pages

Basically, John’s company helps young children in poor communities develop strong learning habits, which include dedication and perseverance. This will help them succeed in later years of their schooling. The Better World Books company really admires John Wood and his philosophy while he continues to, “build libraries in rural villages of Nepal” (Better World Books). There are other organizations very similar to Room to Read, such as Books for Africa, Worldfund, National Center for Families Learning, and, “80 other literacy partners” (Better World Books), are companies which Better World Books generates fundings for in every book they sell. This “people” aspect of the triple bottom line for this book company shows how they work with other companies, donate their fundings to help people in poorer parts of the world, and help to improve education for less fortunate people.
The “planet” aspect of a typical company is supposed to show how the company is benefitting the planet, ecologically, rather than destroying the Earth with pollution and waste. Better World Book’s term for the planet aspect is “loving your mother”, which applies to loving planet Earth. There is a book by Paul Hawken called, The Ecology of Commerce. In this book, Paul argues that, “a true economy mimics ecology in its circular no-waste systems and healthy fecundity of niches” (Better World Books). The company’s website discusses how they are trying to make the delivery of their books more sustainable. The company is going through a program where they know their carbon footprint and are trying to balance out the amount of carbon emissions that are generated through the entirety of the company’s production, including shipping and handling. They have done t...

... middle of paper ...

...” (Gunther). From these statements, Amazon clearly does not show sustainability through their company, even though they are one of the largest, and most popular bookselling companies on the market. Amazon does not, “take back electronic waste” (Gunther). Instead, it refers customers to other websites, like Earth911 for instance. This website advises people to take their old electronics back to Best Buy, Staples, and Circuit City. However, Circuit City is a company which has been bankrupt for about five years! This shows that Amazon is not a reliable company, for they do not show the same “green” aspects like Better World Books does. Amazon does not dissect a triple bottom line like Better World Books does, probably because they do not live by this practice. Our group truly believes that BWB is showing how their practices coincide with their true philosophy.

Open Document