Analysis Of Athanasius Hermeneutics

749 Words2 Pages

Athanasius devotes much of his writings and his life to discount and discredit the heretical writing of the Arians. Leithart puts it best when he says that Athanasius’ hermeneutics is “situated, always in the church…[and] is always embattled,” being that Athanasius always tried to stay true to scripture. Athanasius thought that he himself was combatting the devil in his writings, being that his work was part of larger battle of spiritual warfare raging within the church. One of Athanasius’ most common hermeneutical strategies that Leithart describes is using allegory to describe himself and his opponents in Biblical Terms. This “political theology” was commonly used throughout this time, but Athanasius, a well-read and well-learned scholar, commonly described himself in regard to biblical characters, and his opponents as biblical devils. Constantius, an avid supporter …show more content…

For example, Adam is not eternal, for he had a beginning, and before he was created he was dust. Considering that God created all things, nothing that has been created can “coexist with the ever-existing God.” This would mean that anything that was made by God would not be eternal from the beginning to the end of time, making it necessary for the Son to be eternally begotten by the Father, as He is equal in the triune Godhead. For Athanasius, “creation persists only through the continuous overflowing goodness of the Creator,” while Christ Himself does not need to be sustained, for He Himself is God in the trinity, and therefore does not need to be sustained in the same way that humans are sustained by the laws of nature. Leithart uses this strategy to point out the need for Jesus to be eternally generated, because if Jesus was created at a certain point in time, He would not in fact be God, but instead would be like humans who were all created at a certain point in

Open Document