An In-Depth Analysis Of Aristotle's Function Argument

1907 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essays on aristotle's ethics

Aristotle determined that there are certain kinds of lives that are objectively better or more Eudaimonia than others. Eudaimonia, by the Greek translation, means living well. Throughout Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle illustrates the objectivity of these lives by explaining the three types: the life of pleasure, the life of honor, and life of study. He attempts to prove objectivity with his function argument. Upon an in-depth analysis of the function argument, it is clear that Aristotle is correct in saying that there are certain kinds of lives that are objectively better than others. He argues that the life of study is the objectivity best kind of life. This paper will defend the notion that Aristotle’s conclusion is congruent with his arguments.
To begin, Aristotle claims that everything, including human beings, has a function and depends on characteristics called virtues to help complete the function well. Human virtue is the virtue of the soul. Virtues are …show more content…

The lynchpin of function argument is that in some that eudemonia is to do something that is divine. Learning, according to Aristotle, is divine because it is widely spread. Also, it involves what exactly a human being’s function is. In Book 1, Chapter 7 of Nicomachean Ethics, the function of the human is to be engaged in activity according to reason. On top of having reason as a function, Aristotle claims that human function is rational activity. This is illustrated when he states, “we take human function to be a certain kind of life, and take this life to be activity and actions of the should that involve reason” (Irwin, 1999, p. 9). This highlights the essence of the life of study. The life of study is a way of living that seeks knowledge. Seeking knowledge is rational activity. Therefore, it is fair for Aristotle, to conclude that the life of study is the objectivity better type of life because of his function

Show More
Related

  • Aristotle's Function Argument

    978 Words  | 2 Pages

    Aristotle raises the function argument in order to find out what the “final good” is for a human being. He describes this “final good” as some goal that every human’s actions should strive for. At first, he chooses happiness as this ultimate goal, and contends that it is a self-sufficient good in which all human do and desire. He also mentions that this final good can only be achieved by being “virtuous”. However, he is not satisfied with happiness; happiness is a mere feeling/sensation and does not provide a clear explanation of what the “final good” is. Furthermore, couldn’t a psychopath achieve his self-sufficient happiness when he murders for the pleasure/happiness

    Read More

  • Is Aristotelian Virtue Ethics a Successful Moral Theory?

    1806 Words  | 4 Pages

    Virtue ethics is a moral theory that was first developed by Aristotle. It suggests that humans are able to train their characters to acquire and exhibit particular virtues. As the individual has trained themselves to develop these virtues, in any given situation they are able to know the right thing to do. If everybody in society is able to do the same and develop these virtues, then a perfect community has been reached. In this essay, I shall argue that Aristotelian virtue ethics is an unsuccessful moral theory. Firstly, I shall analyse Aristotelian virtue ethics. I shall then consider various objections to Aristotle’s theory and evaluate his position by examining possible responses to these criticisms. I shall then conclude, showing why Aristotelian virtue ethics is an unpractical and thus an unsuccessful moral theory in reality.

    Read More

  • Virtue and Happiness in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics

    1147 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...it is necessary to examine human virtue. Something is considered to have reason in two senses: that which has reason in itself and that which listens to reason. These two senses are the origin of the distinction between intellectual and ethical virtues, respectively. The understanding of virtue and happiness is justified in the ideal that happiness is to be found in pleasure, others that it is to be found in honor, and others that it is to be found in contemplation. Happiness is not found in living for pleasure because such a life is slavish. Nor is it found in seeking honor because honor depends not on the person but on what others think of him. In order to be successful in an organization it is key to find a balance between two extremes that is an end within itself, that’s why Aristotle strongly believes that happiness is acquired through political organization.

    Read More

  • The Human Function Argument

    2003 Words  | 5 Pages

    Aristotle argues that the human function is activity of the soul that expresses or requires reason. This argument is found in Nicomachean Ethics approximately between Bekker lines 1097b24 and 1098a9.

    Read More

  • Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics

    2039 Words  | 5 Pages

    In Book I of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle states that the ultimate human goal or end is happiness. Aristotle then describes steps required for humans to obtain the ultimate happiness. He also states that activity is an important requirement of happiness. A virtuous person takes pleasure in doing virtuous things. He then goes on to say that living a life of virtue is something pleasurable in itself. The role of virtue to Aristotle is an important one, with out it, it seems humans cannot obtain happiness. Virtue is the connection one has to happiness and how they should obtain it. My goal in this paper is to connect Aristotle’s book of Nicomachean Ethics to my own reasoning of self-ethics. I strongly agree with Aristotle’s goal of happiness and conclude to his idea of virtues, which are virtuous states of character that affect our decision making in life.

    Read More

  • Nicomachean Ethics

    1016 Words  | 3 Pages

    Immediately, Aristotle alleges that all actions aim for good, thus proposing that all human activity is to be of some good. These activities attempt to meet a greater end; a chief good met by subordinate desires. However, Aristotle introduces that the nature of good is presumed by convention, not nature, and are administered by politics. Governments determine which sciences and arts are studied, who studies them, and the extent to which they are studied.

    Read More

  • Analyzing Shakespeare´s Account of Human Nature in King Lear in Comparison With Other Authors

    1435 Words  | 3 Pages

    In conclusion, it remains that, even after being around for over 2000 years, Aristotle’s philosophy on human nature remains one of the most accurate questions to the eternal question of “what is human nature?” It may not, in the end, prove to be the correct answer to the question, in fact, it may very well be possible that there is no definite answer possible. But until scholars and students in programs such as ours can find a suitable replacement, his analysis will remain superior to all others.

    Read More

  • Aristotle and Happiness of the Soul

    716 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of Aristotle’s conclusions in the first book of Nicomachean Ethics is that “human good turns out to be the soul’s activity that expresses virtue”(EN 1.7.1098a17). This conclusion can be explicated with Aristotle’s definitions and reasonings concerning good, activity of soul, and excellence through virtue; all with respect to happiness.

    Read More

  • Does Aristotle’s Function Argument Offer a Convincing Account of the Human Good?

    1843 Words  | 4 Pages

    Aristotle on Function and Virtue. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 3 (3), p. 259-279. Nagel, T., (1972). Aristotle on Eudaimonia. Phronesis, Vol.

    Read More

  • Aristotle's Philosophy on Purpose

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    Interest is sparked in this area that Aristotle writes of because there is a natural need for Ethics in human life. John K. Roth states, “Aristotle assumes that all things, human beings included, have a good, a purpose or end, which it is their nature to fulfill”. This helps one understand Aristotle’s way of thinking, and provides insight to the basis of his theories. A common theory explored by Aristotle is the Ethics of Virtues, and how to practice them. A theory included in Aristotle’s Virtue Ethics is the unity of all the virtues, and in order to be virtuous, one must exhibit all the virtues. One of these virtues being practical wisdom, or Phronesis.

    Read More

  • Aristotle's Ethics

    577 Words  | 2 Pages

    Aristotle’s thoughts on ethics conclude that all humans must have a purpose in life in order to be happy. I believe that some of the basics of his ideas still hold true today. This essay points out some of those ideas.

    Read More

  • Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics

    1511 Words  | 4 Pages

    Aristotle states that the human function is the life activity of the part of the soul that has reason. He extends this further by stating that some sort of activity of the past of the soul that has reason has to be according to virtue. This will create a good man. For Aristotle, in order to be happy, humans must perform their function well in accordance with virtue. In Book II, Aristotle makes a distinction between two types of virtues: those which are considered ethical and those which are considered intellectual.

    Read More

  • Virtue Ethics Case Study

    853 Words  | 2 Pages

    The three main areas are Eudaimonism which is a moral philosophy that is used to define the right action. According to Eudaimonism, an action which is right is one which leads to the well-being of an individual. It, therefore, holds the well-being as though it has an essential value. .Eudaimonism also bases virtues in the form of human flourishing. It is from here that flourishing is seen as performance involving one 's distinctive function which comes in the best possible way. In humans, Aristotle did put forwards an argument that one of the most distinct function is reasoning. After listening, the life which is lived in a good way is defined as one which the one living has lived to reason well.

    Read More

  • Virtue and Happiness

    1466 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...rts of the soul in order to find the function of human beings which is activity in accordance with reason. It is first in this function that men ought to be virtuous. It is thanks to the same distinction that Aristotle gives the different types of virtues. However while Aristotle dedicates most of his piece to the practical, active aspects of virtue it is necessary to keep in mind the virtues of the life of study which is reintroduced in the chapters 7 and 8 of book X. Thus what appears as a contradiction in these chapters is in fact a reminder and a justification of the honourable and divine aspect of the life of study which is necessary to reach complete happiness.

    Read More

  • The Aristotle's Idea of a Good Life

    1047 Words  | 3 Pages

    To Aristotle leading a good life, for the most part, means fulfilling one’s purpose in a way that is good by balancing life’s pleasures. In order to determine if an object fulfills its function in a good way, we must first consider the object. If we were to agree that a car should be reliable, then we could also agree that reliable car should be considered a good car. Similarly, animals, for example, possess certain traits like the power of locomotion, and the desire to seek nourishment and reproduce. According to Aristotle, an animal that is a fast runner, or a very successful hunter would be considered a good animal. Following this reasoning, Aristotle believed that in order for a human to be good, he or she must also fulfill their purpose. Yet, as an advanced species, we must go beyond fulfilling these animalistic functions like eating right and reproducing well. In order for a human to live the good life, he or she must first be good at using powers of intellect and reason, which Aristotle believed were unique to only humans and, as a result, constitute our purpose (McManaman). It seems that in addition to being a good human, Aristotle also recognized pleasure must play a role in the good life. Still, he recognized the importance of balance when indulging in acts of pleasure claiming that a life of only pleasure was too animalistic (Richter, 2008). In this way, Aristotle believed the key to a good life was to fulfill one’s function a good way, while balancing life’s pleasures in a way that allowed the...

    Read More

More about An In-Depth Analysis Of Aristotle's Function Argument

Open Document