Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the role of government in public policy
Concept of public administration
Concept of public administration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is the role of government in public policy
The Public and The Public Administrator 1.) Who / What is the Public in Public Administration? This is an attempt at defining the term “public” in Public Administration based on my understanding of PA readings, lectures attended and, personal insights. Wilson (1887) described the public in many words. To summarize, the public is either referred to as a tangible human in a community or intangible entity. The former would generally refer to the people of a particular geographic location, sovereign people, masters, authoritative critic, intelligent critics of government who are bold, alert and, inquisitive. Other terms used to depict the public would be the governed, a country, a society, the world. Wilson also described the public …show more content…
There are two perspectives presented in the article namely, the individualist – economic core approach and the normative perspective. The first tells us that the publicness is necessary in the “production of goods and services becoming supportive to the needs of the people”. The second perspective tells us that the government must “provide structures that allow the community to identify itself as part of the community as a means of preserving and strengthening public interest”. The public is somehow referred to by Pesch and Wilson in the same manner attributing public to “needs” and “interest” of the people, both intangible and …show more content…
Among the various historical Public Administration personalities, Wilson (1887) has presented the many facets of what and who a Public Administrator was and should be. He initially identified the Public Administrator as the absolute ruler like a king in a monarchy, a tyrant, despot, monopolist/s or oligarchs. When the absolute rulers were overtaken by “popular control”, the administrator would refer to the state, the sovereign people or popular sovereignty or popular rule. Governor was another term used to denote administrator, acting as a servant (civil servant) of the governed – great office of public trust. At this point, public opinion evolved just like a monarch but is comprised of many people / minds with different opinions. Wilson said, “wherever public opinion exists it must rule”. I shall enumerate the many names / activities which were mentioned by Wilson in his article with reference to who and what a public administrator was/is. The Public Administrator is also known as: “the technical official for state activities or executor of public law The administrator should have and does have a will of his own in the choice of means for accomplishing his work. He is not and ought not to be a mere passive instrument.” an “administrative organizer – to fit administration with the conditions of clear cut responsibility
Barnardos, is an organised pressure group which aims at influencing the policies or actions of the government for the benefits of achieving their vision in representing children’s welfare.
Walker, L. (1989). Woodrow Wilson, Progressive Reform, and Public Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 104(3), 509-525.
In the opening theoretical argument on “publics” the author quotes the words of Jan Kiely that publics “exist by virtue of being addressed.” (p. 7)
Fox and Miller’s discourse theory allows a plurality of standpoints, asking only that participants in the discourse be sincere, transcend (but not deny) their own agendas, participate willingly, and offer a substantive contribution (broadly defined). These requirements become the standards by which they judge some current practices in public administration-opinion surveys, citizen panels, and policy analysis- and find them wanting. A true discourse approach to public administration would avoid one-way interaction between public servants and the public.
Falconer, P.K. (1997) ‘Public Administration and New Public Management: Lesson from the UK Experience’, in Davies, Morton, et al. New State, New Millennium, New Public Management, School of Public Administration, Ljubljana.
Woodrow Wilson’s purpose in writing “The Study of Administration” is to bring awareness that the government systems in place need to be re-evaluated and improved. Wilson encourages we need to examine the history of administration set forth by others in determining certain needs to be accomplished in effective ways and methods. Wilson’s desirable outcomes for research within the public administration field are for government systems to become more productive and organized.
Public Administration involves the development, implementation and management of policies for the attainment of set goals and objectives that will be to the benefit of the general public. Since Public Administration involves taking decisions that affect the use of public resources there is often the question of how to utilize public resources for maximum public good. The National Association of Public Administration has identified four pillars of public administration: economy, efficiency, effectiveness and social equity. These pillars are equally important in the practice of public administration and to its success. This paper seeks to explain the role of each of the pillars in the practice of public administration.
The central role of public administration is the provision of services to the public (Rosenbloom, 2005; De Guzman, n.d). As aforementioned and underscored previously, health service is one of them. Like other social services, it takes the form of a policy, a bundle of decisions, in other words (Hague & Harrop, 2010).In this section the authors would like to look into what scholars have said about citizen participation, how they explain its importance and how it can best be utilized in the provision of health care.
This essay discusses the radical transformation of the principles and foundations of public administration from traditional to New Public Management. Firstly the essay will attempt to define the key terms of traditional public administration and the doctrine of New Public Management. Rabin J. (2003) explains that New Public Management embodies “a process in public administration that uses information and experiences obtained in business management and other disciplines to improve efficiency, usefulness and general operation of public services in contemporary bureaucracies.“Traditional Public Administration progresses from governmental contributions, with services perceived by the bureaucracy.
The purpose of this assignment is to analyze why the public sectors of the major economies have grown over the past 60 years. This assignment will also examine why and how governments might wish to control this growth. According to Wikipedia, the public sector is that part of the economy that provides basic government services. Its composition varies by country, but in most countries the public sector includes services such as the police, military, public roads, public transit, primary education and healthcare for the general public or people within the governments’ jurisdiction. The public sector might provide services that non-tax payer cannot be excluded from (such as street lighting), services which benefit all of society rather than just the individual who uses the service (such as public education), and services that encourage equal opportunity (such as town planning).
Traditional public administration is traced back to the works of scholars like Max Weber, Woodrow Wilson and Fredrick Taylor. This form of administration was mostly influenced by Max Weber with his bureaucratic model and theory. Max Weber was a well-known sociologist born in Germany in the year 1864. He came up with his bureaucratic model as a way to try to improve management in organizations. ‘Weber emphasized on top-down control in the form of monocratic hierarchy that is a system of control in which policy is set at the top and carried out through a series of offices, whereby every manager and employee are to report to one person in top management and held accountable by that manager’ (Pfiffner, 2004, p. 1).
Over time, how have members of the field of public administration examined the subject of policy and administration (has the dichotomy changed)?
According to Saetnan et al. in the reading “Controlling CCTV in Public Spaces: Is Privacy the (Only) Issue? Reflections on Norwegian and Danish observations” defines public as “there is no tradition for excluding people from public streets or from ordinary shops on the basis of appearance by excluding
In the political approach, political authority is divided between a central government and the provincial or state governments. This means that some provinces or states are accorded a substantial measure of constitutional or legal sovereignty, although they still remain subordinates of the central government in certain constitutional or legal respects. The political approach promotes the political values of military strength, economic development, union, and representation. In addition, it is characterized by three central features: state sovereignty, bicameralism, and multiple layers of representation.
Public policy can be defined as “What ever governments choose to do or not do” (Dye, 2008, p 2). In the context of this essay, public policies are a set of actors by the government in order to reach out to the masses. The ministries and departments are mandated to deliver specific mandates in the form of public goods and services.