An Analysis Of Caroline Smith's 'The Teenager'

699 Words2 Pages

In a court of law, the truth is only as valued as the stories lawyers spin for their clients. Along the way, events may be exaggerated, details may be undermined, but ultimately the case is left up to a jury who choose to identify with one of the perspectives. Caroline Smith’s poem entitled “The Teenager” constitutes as an affidavit, outlining the facts of a burglary case involving an adolescent. However, the vagueness Smith integrates through ambiguous pronouns and free indirect discourse encourages speculation on the identity of the abusive perpetrator as well as the extent of his misconduct. The poem opens in medias res of the teenager’s testimony as he recalls the mistreatment of a dog. Smith illustrates the offender “[dragging the dog] across the floor, / its claws out in resistance” (Smith 3-4) in order to victimize the hound. With its flaws flailing in protest, the animal is clearly unhappy with the offender’s actions. Even the appearance of the dog with “fur hooding its eyes” frames it as a vulnerable creature whose mop of hair obscures its vision—a fragile barrier from witnessing the horrors of the world (Smith 5). The description becomes violent as the the offender “shook and twisted / the folds of [the dog’s] neck” (Smith 7-8) implying strangulation. Arguably the most vivid description of abuse in the poem, Smith leaves …show more content…

The back and forth of “he did this so they (the jury) conclude this” emphasize how little control the teenager has in his fate, much like the dog. Ironically, the dog is brought up again as the teenager brashly proclaims that “he was glad/ he'd hurt the dog / so they said he had no remorse” (Smith 31-33). Likely attempt to use denial to bury his feelings, the teenager isn’t particularly well-equipped to deal with feelings of guilt and remorse and as such passively accepts his fate as a

Open Document