American Landscape Painting Analysis

2812 Words6 Pages

The History of American Landscape Painting 1

The History of American Landscape Painting
Hayleigh Weldin
California State University, Bakersfield

Landscape paintings became of interest to artists as a way to depict nature, a man?s spiritual place in the world, and his relation to God (Pohl, 2012). The paintings of nature became a way for artists to express themselves visually and spiritually while also expanding what people could see, read, and feel (Pohl, 2012). Landscape paintings helped to grow communities and expand the western movement (Pohl, 2012). There was an issue between tearing down and using the resources of nature to build communities and to increase material wealth (Pohl, 2012).
Angela Miller examined landscape …show more content…

It appeared that Asher B. Durand who was the president of the National Academy of Design would be a reasonable choice to follow in Cole's footsteps; however, this did not happen (Pohl, 2012). Asher B. Durand was a prominent landscape artist on the East Coast who began his career as an engraver in the 1830s before making a change to painting landscapes (Pohl, 2012). In 1849 after the death of Thomas Cole, Asher B. Durand created a painting called, The Kindred Spirits depicting Cole with his friend William Collin Bryant (Lewis, 2002). The backdrop for the painting showed two of Cole's favorite sceneries, Kaaterskill Falls and Catskill Clove (Lewis, 2002). The painting, The Kindred Spirits, was viewed as the beginning work of "American Sublime" (Lewis, 2002). Thomas Cole had a shining artist following in his tracks by the name of Frederic Edwin Church (Miller, 1993). Church became Thomas Cole's student in 1844 and was known to be the only one who studied under his direction (Pohl, 2012). Church in his landscape painting depicted nature transformed by civilization (Pohl, 2012). Church and other artists who had followed Cole had a lot of pressure on themselves to maintain the high praise and dignity that Cole had gained on landscape art while still pursuing a national voice and changing the way people viewed landscape art and what it meant to …show more content…

The paintings reflected a light, which produced a radiance being dubbed "luminists" in 1954 by art historian John I. H. Baur (Pohl, 2012). The "luminists" landscape artists were: Fitz Hugh Lane (1804-65), John Frederick Kensett (1816-72), and Martin Johnson Head (1819-1904) (Pohl, 2012). According to Pohl (2012), in Lane's, The Western Shore with Norman's Woe of 1862, Kensett's Beacon Rock, Newport Harbor of 1857, and the Heade's Thunder Storm on Narragansett Bay of 1868, "one senses not the bravura of a nation whose future lies to the west, but the reflectiveness of a nation whose past lies to the east and whose future is not yet resolved" (p. 161). The qualities of "luminist" painters were differentiated from the "pastoral, allegorical, and sublime landscapes" of Church, Cole and numerous artists (Pohl, 2012). According to Pohl (2012), a literary scholar named David C. Miller wrote, "the impersonality of many luminists paintings derives from the simplification and abstraction of forms and in evenness of the treatment of the entire composition that verges on a democratization of the picture plane" (p.161-62). Head's painting, Thunder Storm, reflected a nervousness and awkward silence that showed a blending with nature (Pohl, 2012). The symbolism that "luminists" artists

Open Document