Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Orwell's attitude to imperialism in shooting an elephant
Orwell's attitude to imperialism in shooting an elephant
Orwell's attitude to imperialism in shooting an elephant
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Society has a great impact on literature. Although there are various works that mobilize and even pivot society to take action on certain issues, the authors of such texts are influenced by the society they live in. Therefore, society defines literature periods more than the actual writings do. Throughout British literature, despite the different epochs in both history and literature, it is evident that there are some overarching themes. During both the romantic and Victorian eras, some of the overlapping themes were those of imperialism and colonialism, globalization, and the superiority of the British. Even in modernist and present day literature, these themes have huge relevant connotations as illustrated in George Orwell’s “Shooting an …show more content…
This is because the British Empire is considered to have lasted for at least four centuries culminating with the transfer of Hong Kong to the Chinese in 1997 (Ghaforian and Gholi 1362). Even then, the British Empire still had fourteen other territories around the globe that it continues to oversee although they are considered independent states. Thus, it is clear why both of these themes would have such a broad impact on writers since authors were already familiar with colonization since the romantic era in British literature. Although both concepts have a great deal in common, there are great differences between imperialism and colonialism which set them apart. Paul Melia in “Imperial Orwell” points out that imperialism means “the acquisition of territory in order to extend dominion” while colonialism refers to when people from a country move in huge numbers to a place they control (12). These essential differences help illustrate how authors use both terms simultaneously in order to convey their messages as the British did both throughout their history. Still, authors are able to deliver a more powerful narrative if they were personally involved in such epochs as Orwell was in “Shooting an …show more content…
This is illustrated as Muldoon in “Meeting the British” focuses on the first encounter between the British and Native Americans in present-day the United States. Despite the fact that the author writes from the standpoint of a Native American instead of a British, the author focuses on the theme of colonialism as Muldoon believes “history is a dynamic phenomenon” (Lesman 85). Therefore, Muldoon tries to make the reader imagine what the first Native Americans must have thought when they met their British counterparts. Alike Orwell, he also tries to convey an antagonistic message about colonialism despite the fact the author is writing about a time in the past. His first two lines, “We met the British in the dead of winter/ The sky was lavender” illustrate the antagonistic tone of the author (lines 1-2). This is because the word “death” alludes to what eventually will become of them as the two civilizations
British Imperialism in India and China Imperialism is the domination of a weaker country by a stronger country. For instance, Britain dominated India and China in the mid 1880s to the beginning of the 20th century. Imperialism has had both a positive and negative effect on the countries involved. Britain was imperialistic for many reasons, it could dominate because it had the technology and power to do so.
It has been often noted that the Romantic writers of English literature were rebelling against the established positions and views of society. Most of the Romantic artists were indigenes of the well-established middle class and they were swiftly tiring of the self-serving political depredation perpetrated by the hands of the upper class. The Romantics were flouting convention, thumbing their noses and calling for radical and widespread reform not only in governmental politics, but within the politics of their own trade--creativity and art. Their myriad of works are clear evidence of this. Contumely against established society was found mostly in the poetical works of the day. However, much social commentary found its way into seemingly unlikely novels. Two such novels are Mary Shelly's Frankenstein and Jane Austen's Mansfield Park. Both of these novels are clever repositories for social commentary and judgment.
Throughout literary history, from Chaucer to Chekov, Shakespeare to Steinbeck, T.S. Eliot to E.L. James, the work of an author is commonly pinpointed to the society and time that he lives in, whether this is the war poetry of Sigmund Sassoon or Edward Thomas written at a time when England was considering what it meant to be in combat, or perhaps the novelists of the 1920s such as Fitzgerald, who engaged an audience languishing in liquor, jazz and motorcars by engaging them in what was so rapidly developing and relatable to them.
After the civil war, United States took a turn that led them to solidify as the world power. From the late 1800s, as the US began to collect power through Cuba, Hawaii, and the Philippines, debate arose among historians about American imperialism and its behavior. Historians such as William A. Williams, Arthur Schlesinger, and Stephen Kinzer provides their own vision and how America ought to be through ideas centered around economics, power, and racial superiority.
What is common in both George Orwell’s writing and Joan Didion’s is the use of imagery and theme in author’s craft. Both essayist use imagery and theme to widen the view for the reader
During the late 19th and 20th century, the United States pursues an aggressive policy of expansionism, extending its political, military, and economic influence across the globe. The events during this ‘age of imperialism’ laid the foundation for America’s international power while simultaneously defining the use of the these powers. The policy that the United States implemented at this time is known as Big Stick Diplomacy which was to speak softly but carry a big stick. This meant that the United States would ask for something or take a stance on an issue and if another nation refused or went against the United States, then the military would be summoned to ‘resolve’ the issues. This domineering foreign policy defined the politics of American Imperialism that was especially prevalent from 1890-1913.
Throughout his argument, Orwell demonstrates several examples of logical appeal. However, his most compelling argument is stated near the beginning of his piece. He opens by showing five examples of what he considers to illustrate “mental vices which we now suffer” (Practical Argument, p.779). Orwell wan...
Throughout American History the U.S. has sought to expand its boundaries. This need increased greatly during the late nineteenth century and early twentieth century with the start of the industrial revolution. This Expansion was a big departure from earlier attempts to expand the boundaries of the U.S. The needed for Natural resources forced the U.S to look for places that could supply them with the natural resources they needed and markets where they could sell their goods in. The need to imperialize caused the U.S. to look to foreign places to gain resources to better the nations industries.
Orwell, George. “Politics and the English Language.” George Orwell: Critical Essays. London: Harvill Secker: 2009. 270-286. Print.
Every writer has that one special quirk that keeps readers coming back for more. Whether it is the humor or the characters, most authors carry their quirks from story to story. In “Shooting an Elephant,” George Orwell describes his experience of shooting an elephant. In “A Hanging,” he describes the emotions that run through him as he watches the hanging of a prisoner. Both essays have similar key ideas that identify Orwell as a writer. The results of pride and power contribute to the themes that connect his essays and identify Orwell as a descriptive writer.
Subsequently, Orwell describes the evident decline of the English prose in political language. Orwell states that when writing politically one is so consumed by the act of keeping a passive voice that their end result just seems vague. He indicates that one shouldn’t hide their main message behind glitz and glamour in order to appeal to someone with different views. Orwell concludes his passage by expressing his desire to change the bag habits of writers. As a result, he establishes six elementary rules in order to avoid the common mistakes he acknowledged earlier.
What is great about British literature is that each literary period corresponds to the time period it is in. The writing represents how the author and people of the period live during the time period; it either describes feelings, opinion, and experience of the time period. Readers are able to feel and imagine, what it is like during the time. They are able to connect with the author, time period, character and the story. Throughout the British literary history from the 1800s to present, there have been a few literary periods. Each literary period was different from their different characteristics. The earliest period was the Romantic Period which started from 1798 until 1870. The literature of the Romantic period comprises of nature, symbolism
Chinua Achebe’s essay An Image of Africa and Hunt Hawkin’s work Heart of Darkness and Racism both discuss the nature of Racism that is manifested on the novella by Joseph Conrad, Heart of Darkness. According to Achebe’s essay, Conrad is a ‘’thorough-going racist’’ (p.343), who refuses to grant human expression and language on Africans. He criticizes Conrad for having an antipathy towards Black people and accuses Heart of Darkness for depicting the Western culture’s stereotype of Africa and therefore giving a false impression of the continent and its people to readers. On the contrary, Hawkin’s essay in a certain degree agrees with Achebe that Conrad’s work has some parts which are racist, and its language dehumanize the Africans. However,
The proposed starting dates range from 1776 to 1789; each of the different starting dates being linked to an event of great social and political impact within this time period. The Romantic Period was unique not only because of its literature, but of the social and political aspects of this time period that affected such literature. Unlike other eras such as the Victorian Age where it began with Queen Victoria’s rule and ended upon her death, the Romantic Period’s timeline was not restricted to the reign of the monarch who ruled during that time, which in turn, made this period one of the shortest periods of British literary history (Greenblatt). Other social aspects such as slave trading, the French Revolution, and the Americans declaring their independence affected the workings of literature as well with writers of this time period creating literature that often expressed their views on the society around them. However, romantic literature was not only just classified by its publication date, but by the characteristics the writers themselves placed upon their
Sociological study of literature began in the 19th century in western countries. In the last century, it developed with much rigour and sophistication. Attempts made so far by different sociologists and social critics to analyze the links of literature and society are of varying nature. There are some scholars who follow deterministic approach and they think that literary works are shaped by the social and historical forces of the time and understanding those is the valid way of understanding. There are others for whom literature is a force ahead of the time ‘indicating new ideas and paths of progress. (Sharma 2013)