Allan Glatthorn Interview

1151 Words3 Pages

Part III: Discussion of Interview Analysis and Findings
Allan Glatthorn in his book Curriculum Leadership sums up the purpose of curriculum planning.
“A goal of curriculum planning is to increase the knowledge and levels of understanding that students take from the instructional events embedded in learning and instructional materials” (Glatthorn, 2011, p. 225)
Interviewing teachers who are in the classroom different from Common Core State Standards for English I will help create deeper insights into the problems and strengths of the standards. The varied views of the school improvement plan and the curriculum in question help an executive leader gain a deep understanding of the most fundamental part of educating students: curriculum and …show more content…

He is very positive in his overall assessment of the school. Teachers who have been at a school for several years tend to be overly critical of the goals as they have seen years of failures and successes deal with the SIT goals. New teachers tend to view the school’s curriculum and goals with optimism. They are positive because they have not experienced anything else. One of the common themes throughout his interview is his desire for more time to collaborate with teachers. This is a common opinion for new teachers because of their lack of experience and desire to improve and learn from the older …show more content…

All teachers feel that collaboration is key for improving student achievement. They all agreed on the importance of data analysis but none of them felt that the curriculum department benchmarks were aligned appropriately enough to be useful in the classroom. Because of the time required to give the assessments, they see the benchmarks as a hindrance to performance. All three teachers agree that resources are limited, however, they were able to overcome this through technology. The interviews showed that the teachers had misconceptions on what the SIT team was actually doing. The newest teacher basically had no knowledge of the effect of the SIT team, whereas the experienced teacher was actively involved in the implementation of the school wide goals. This shows a lack of communication from the executive team regarding the work of the SIT and the status of annual

Open Document