All Quiet On The Western Front Comradery

1487 Words3 Pages

Narrated by nineteen-year-old German soldier Paul Bäumer, All Quiet on the Western Front details the time Paul spent at the French front during World War Two. Through his eyes, author Erich Maria Remarque makes it clear that humans are not built for war. The untapped, bottomless strength advertised as something one possesses by enlisting does not exist – there is only so much a person can take before total collapse. This explains why comradery is valued so highly among Paul and his regiment; the constant suffering of warfare can be distributed between many to reduce the burden of the individual, to an extent. But during the interims in which one is left alone, and in order to sustain the greater body with an explicit contribution of will, survival …show more content…

In addition, the theme of comradery is plainly slotted as an alternative to standing alone, in the sense that Paul himself feels that being part of a larger body is a survival tactic. The placement of this statement within this particular thought implies that it, too, requires Paul to surrender his sense of self to his more animalistic side that keeps his body alive. The reader is privy to a less conscious and more painful confusion of identity experienced by Paul after he murders French soldier Gérard Duval. Paul says, of Duval, “This dead man is bound up with my life, therefore I must do everything, promise everything in order to save myself…deep down in me lies the hope that I may buy myself off in this way and perhaps even get out of this…I have killed the printer, Gérard Duval. I must be a printer, I think confusedly, be a printer, printer” (225). In this scene, Paul continually makes promises he cannot fulfill of giving years of his life to Duval if only he would live, clearly showing that time is considered by Paul as a sort of karmic currency. He references some moral need to take Duval’s place in the world and abandon his own in order to repent for what he has taken. Using his identity as a superstitious bargaining chip is another …show more content…

Paul remarks that, to a soldier, “the things that existed before are no longer valid, and one practically knows them no more” (22). They are alienated from their old lives because the people who lived them did not survive the front, where one’s identity must be sacrificed in order to return home at all. This is epitomized in the scene in which Paul stands in his childhood bedroom during his first leave, trying desperately to feel the connection he has once felt with his home and to ignore the more persuasive tug of his soldier’s reality. He wants to be reassured by his familiar surroundings, hoping that simply being back where he started will remove the effect the front has had on him, especially since he can appreciate it now. Alas, Paul realizes that his soldierly persona is not shed so easily, and he states that he “fear(s) to importune it too much, because I do not know what might happen then. I am a soldier, and I must cling to that” (173). If he tries too hard to regain what he has lost, then he may, in the process, lose what keeps him alive at the front. He acknowledges that his identity is now that of a soldier and that losing sight of that could get him killed. Paul even states explicitly that he “ought not to have come on leave” because he has lost the numbness provided to him through his sacrifices in taking reprieve from the constant suffering of the front (185). The re-realization of his

Open Document