All Quiet On The Western Front And The Man He Killed Analysis

1252 Words3 Pages

All Quiet On The Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque and The Man He Killed by Thomas Hardy both tell the story of men who are ravaged by a war and are forced into situations that lead them to have to choose between their own lives or the lives of others. While these two men’s stories take place in different countries at different times, they both go through the struggle of the universal soldier. The men were not naturally inclined to kill and both reflected after they killed another man that they could have been friends with that man and felt no true animosity towards their supposed enemy. The Man He Killed and All Quiet On The Western Front may take place in different time frames, but both ponder the same question: who is the enemy? Paul …show more content…

Yet in neither case did they kill their foe because they felt a personal hatred for this enemy. Both Paul and the narrator killed because they were ordered to kill and because they had no other choice if they wanted to survive. The narrator of The Man He Killed when faced with an enemy “shot at him as he at me, and killed him in his place” (Hobbes). The narrator understood that the man he killed was his supposed enemy and yet he still thought that in another situation the “enemy” was somebody he would “treat, if met where any bar is” (Hobbes). In All Quiet On The Western Front Paul shares a similar view to the narrator of The Man He Killed. When coming upon an “enemy” Paul “[strikes] madly at home” killing the man but upon further reflection Paul begins to feel guilty for his actions (Remarque 216). Paul realizes that he had no personal grudge with this man and was forced to kill him to save himself. Both Paul and the narrator are aware that the men they killed were not the enemy, but only Paul was able to discover who was the actual enemy while the narrator accepted his situation without thinking. Paul begins to look at the bigger picture and realizes that “perhaps if twenty or thirty people in the world had said No” he would have nobody to fight and he would have no need to kill (Remarque 203). Both Paul and the narrator understand that those fighting them …show more content…

In All Quiet On The Western Front the main character, Paul, begins to view the men he is fighting as more than just animals. In chapter eight Paul is at a camp in which former Russian soldiers are held prisoner. The Russian prisoners are given very little to eat and very little supplies or items at all needed to survive and in this image of misery Paul finally begins to see these men as people. Paul realizes that “ a word of command has made these men [his] enemies” and even more importantly that a “word of command might transform them into [his] friends” (Remarque 193-194). At this moment Paul realized that the men that he was fighting were more than his enemy and were also people. Even more importantly Paul realized that the men he was supposed to be fighting were not the actual enemy and were only the enemy because of a person's command. The narrator of The Man He Killed appears to grasp the idea that the enemy is human at the beginning of the poem as he says that if he and the enemy had met at an ancient inn they would have sat down to “wet right many a nipperkin” (Hardy). As both Paul and the narrator begin to view the people they are fighting as human their image of who the enemy is slowly fades away as both men realize

Open Document