Alexander Hamilton’s First Federalist Paper

1086 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Federalist papers essay

Alexander Hamilton’s First Federalist Paper

Alexander Hamilton’s first Federalist Paper endorses ratification of the proposed constitution. His unifying point is that the use of reason—in the form of the people’s "reflection and choice"—will lead to the truth, whereas their use of passion will lead to ruin. Hamilton attempts to persuade his readers to make the correct decision by reminding them of the sheer importance of the matter. He suggests that "good men" will want to make the correct choice in light of their "true interests" (33), while the adversaries of the Constitution will be ruled by passions, deceit, and even weak minds. He frankly warns his readers against "any impressions other than those which may result from the evidence of truth" (35); he offers them a chance to join him on the right side of the issue, which he implies he has arrived at by knowledgeable deliberation. Finally, Hamilton courts his audience by implying that they will use reason to reach the truth. By contrast, the opponents of the Constitution rely on their emotions and follow a "much more certain road to the introduction of despotism" (35).

In the first paragraph, Hamilton introduces the idea of truth—not in passing, but by asking whether "good government from reflection and choice" is at all possible (33). He indicates that the decision is of greater importance than just one country; the wrong decision would "deserve to be considered as the general misfortune of mankind" (33). By broadening the implications of the question at hand, depicting it as "of the first magnitude to society" (34), and describing the Constitution as "the safest course for your liberty, your dignity, and your happiness" (36) and "favorable to the discovery of truth" ...

... middle of paper ...

... is a compliment to his readers’ minds. He uses words like "consideration," "frankly acknowledge to you," and "I propose" (36) to illustrate the rationalism he expects to share with them.

Hamilton uses imagery and rhetorical language effectively in order to discredit his adversaries in the eyes of the people. His main tool is a rationalistic "truth" which he detaches from his opponents and associates with himself. He also portrays "truth" religiously, and connects the Constitution and its supporters with the highest cause. Hamilton passionately defends and elevates the people’s use of reason. But he equally passionately believes that the people’s reason is admirable only when it leads to the conclusion that the United States needs a strong, vigorous, central government.

Source Cited

The Federalist Papers, ed. Clinton Rossiter New York: Penguin Books, 1961

Show More
Related

  • Alexander Hamilton's "Federalist no. 78"

    1100 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Federalist no. 78 Hamilton takes what is in the Constitution and elaborates it so that the common man feels compelled to believe what is being said. Hamilton uses a sense of fear but fear in the everyday sense. “As no man can be sure that he may not tomorrow be the victim of a spirit of injustice” (Hamilton.Jay.Madison 105) Hamilton does an excellent job of wrapping the box and tying a nice little bow on the top.

    Read More

  • Bill of Rights To Protect From Tyranny

    768 Words  | 2 Pages

    Supporters of the Constitution called themselves Federalists, a name referring to a balance of power between the states and the national government. They argued for a federal system as in the Constitution. James Madison claimed that the Constitution was less dangerous that it looked because the separation of powers protected people from tyrannical abuse. The Federalists compile a group of essays, known as The Federalist Papers. In No. 51, Madison insisted that the division of powers and they system of checks an balances would protect Americans from the tyranny of centralized authority. He wrote that opposite motives among government office holders were good, and was one of the advantages of a big government with different demographics. In No. 10, he said that there was no need to fear factions, for not enough power would be given to the faction forming people; thus, they wouldn't become tyrannical. Hamilton, in No. 84, defended the Constitution with the case that the Constitution can be amended by representatives, who are there to represent the citizens' interests.

    Read More

  • The Inevitable Two-Party System in the U.S.

    1535 Words  | 4 Pages

    "Teaching History.org, Home of the National History Education Clearinghouse." Jefferson versus Hamilton. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Nov. 2013. .

    Read More

  • Aristotle's Legacy In The Federalist Papers

    2064 Words  | 5 Pages

    When examining selections from Aristotle's teachings or the Federalist Papers, the one common element that is clear is that the authors of these works sought the same goal. That goal was to create a practical and rational outline of a better way of life for those who would seek it. That such an outline would be so necessary or that any one person would presume to be qualified to compose such a treaty, particularly when mankind claims exclusivity as the enlightened, civilized, and intelligent species of the planet, reveals a certain degree of conceit. If conceit is the charge towards Aristotle, or Hamilton, or the other authors of the Papers, then Madison or Hamilton (it is unclear to scholars which man is responsible for the following passage) refutes this charge quite

    Read More

  • Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton

    653 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...der Hamilton shaped the New World and the way in which policies were managed. Today’s United States government mirrors more the ideas of Alexander Hamilton, but it seems the majority of her people prefer the vision of Thomas Jefferson; the idealistic dream of true freedom and of the ability to shape one’s own destiny. Would it be the other way around if the current state of government was turned? For sure, if one vision had prevailed wholly over the other, the outcome would be substantial in modern society; Hamilton’s vision would have created another England and Jefferson’s – who knows?

    Read More

  • Essay On Definition Of Religion

    1106 Words  | 3 Pages

    In order to use these six points as the basis of critique, it is necessary first to give them definitions in the context of defining a religion (Shulman, Definitions of Religion Quiz). Also included are examples to help illustrate the definitions. Furthermore, the definitions present themselves in an order of what this author considers most important useful to a definition of religion. Bias means not using one’s own personal views as the basis of a definition. It is bias, for example, to include the idea of a deity in a definition of religion, because that does not take into consideration the notion of a non-theist religion, such as Buddhism. Not being too narrow is focusing on one aspect or religion. For example, stating religion is about bettering one’s life does not take into account the var...

    Read More

  • Philosophers Of The Federalist Papers

    1120 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Independent Journal published the first Federalist essay in 1787, closely following the Constitutional Convention. This was one of 85 essays that were all soon published in support of the Constitution. The essays were all published under the alias name “Publius.” All essays were compiled into a single volume titled The Federalist Papers. The Federalist Papers is considered a significant illustration of American political philosophy under the Articles of Confederation, which were adopted by the Continental Congress. The Articles set up the first legislative system that unified the thirteen states that battled in the American Revolution. A major theme that was discussed in the essays centers around the idea that the United States could not continue to endure under the Articles of Confederation and the weaknesses that accompany it. The Articles gave states the authority to create their own laws, however they were unsuccessful in creating a strong government. The essay suggested that immediate action be taken to prevent the impending anarchy that would ensue under these Articles.

    Read More

  • History of Drones and How They would Re-Shape Modern Warfare

    1683 Words  | 4 Pages

    Drones and UAVs are remote control vehicles that need no pilot, instead they use a signal coming from a machine that someone is controlling. Although that is not always been the case for drones, the technology in its primitive stage was available during the late 1800’s. It was seen during the civil war in the form of hot air balloons and both north and south possessed a way to create the machines. They contained a timed mechanism that would release an explosive when the time was over, this seemed very clever, but at the time it was not very effective. Years passed and the Wright brothers and created the airplane in the early 1900’s, and they did needed pilots. The concept of airplanes was moved to the next level when in the 1930’s Britain Royal Navy created one of the first UAVs. This particular UAV was know as “The Queen Bee’’. This particular model was driven by what is said to be a radio signal. Much later Drones became much more complex and that is because years of technological advances were added to old models that were being produced in late 1900’s. Today, ...

    Read More

  • Democracy In The 19th Century

    1358 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the construction of the new Constitution, many of the most prominent and experienced political members of America’s society provided a framework on the future of the new country; they had in mind, because of the failures of the Articles of Confederation, a new kind of government where the national or Federal government would be the sovereign power, not the states. Because of the increased power of the national government over the individual states, many Americans feared it would hinder their ability to exercise their individual freedoms. Assuring the people, both Alexander Hamilton and James Madison insisted the new government under the constitution was “an expression of freedom, not its enemy,” declaring “the Constitution made political tyranny almost impossible.” (Foner, pg. 227) The checks and balances introduced under the new and more powerful national government would not allow the tyranny caused by a king under the Parliament system in Britain. They insisted that in order achieve a greater amount of freedom, a national government was needed to avoid the civil unrest during the system under the Articles of Confederation. Claiming that the new national government would be a “perfect balance between liberty and power,” it would avoid the disruption that liberty [civil unrest] and power [king’s abuse of power in England] caused. The “lackluster leadership” of the critics of the new constitution claimed that a large land area such as America could not work for such a diverse nation.

    Read More

  • Founding Brothers

    807 Words  | 2 Pages

    ... the United Stated is still together today. No matter how many corrupt politicians or non-virtuous men take office, the men who created the Constitution created a document that would keep the people unified enough to fight through it and the people would prevail. Hamilton defended the small thought of republicanism even though there was no sure was that it would prevail. Burr was a threat to the republic and was corrupt enough to break the small unity that America had.

    Read More

  • Fourth Amendment: Safeguard or Violation?

    805 Words  | 2 Pages

    The US military has used drones in the war against terrorist for years now and the use of drones for domestic use has become a popular dispute. A lot of Americans consider flying drones over private property violates the fourth Amendment and the only time a drone should be used is if the drone operator has a warrant and probable cause. It is considered trespassing by some if a warrant is not obtained. In 2013, 43 states debated 96 different drone regulating bills but only 8 of them passed. Along with legislatures, the FAA has also had trouble regulating drone flight. The government has manipulated the rules of privacy for years. In two separate but similar court cases, the police department used aerial surveillance to get Intel on marijuana farms. The owners of the farms declared that the method was unconstitutional and took it to court. The courts ruled in favor of the government, in saying that the helicopters were above a certain height of 1000 feet and it was not invading their

    Read More

  • Alexander Hamilton

    1037 Words  | 3 Pages

    “[T]he man on the ten-dollar bill is the father of the American treasury system, a signer of the Constitution, one of the primary authors of the Federalist Papers, and the loser of the infamous duel with Vice President Aaron Burr. Alexander Hamilton's earlier career as a Continental Army officer is less well known. Yet Hamilton's first experience in public service is important, not only because it was the springboard to his later career, but because it also deeply influenced his values and thinking” (Hamilton).

    Read More

  • Bill Of Rights Vs Federalism Essay

    483 Words  | 1 Pages

    Each side had their own opinions and way of thinking, leading them to disagreements. Hamilton, while recognizing the benefits of the territorial and Institutional division of power, leaves no doubt that he prefers a concentration to a dispersion of power. It implies the superiority of federal legislation on the state and the possibility of executing that federal law within the States.

    Read More

  • Drones Pros And Cons Essay

    632 Words  | 2 Pages

    Should countries be allowed to use drones in modern countries? Since the installment of drones in warfare, the unmanned aerial combat vehicle has proven to be quite an effective tool. Nowadays, the efficiency of drones has overpowered the opposing arguments since it has more pros than cons. By defining the importance to keep military personnel safe, by providing coherent data on civilian lives, and by refuting the significance of drones to keep terrorism at bay, one will be enlightened to see that drones are the way of the future.

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Drones

    1338 Words  | 3 Pages

    Today, more and more people are using drones. Drones are fairly new and so there are not many restrictions on them. For avid hobbyists, drones are a fun way to pass the time, however, criminals can easily manipulate drones and cause panic to the public. One concern of the public with drones is that drones have the ability to invade people’s privacy. The government uses drones to carry out airstrikes on suspected terrorists although it’s a useful tactic, the airstrikes can easily kill innocent civilians. Drones can be a fun way to pass the time, but in the wrong hands can cause a lot of problems. The government needs to keep a close eye on drones and put regulations in as needed.

    Read More

More about Alexander Hamilton’s First Federalist Paper

Open Document