Alan Brinkley

593 Words2 Pages

) Alan Brinkley is an Allan Nevins Professor of American History at Columbia University, where he specializes in teaching the history America in the twentieth-century. Brinkley received his A.B. in Princeton University in 1971 and his Ph.D. at Harvard University in 1979. Brinkley also taught American History at Oxford University as the Harmsworth Professor from 1998-99 and taught American History at the University of Cambridge and has stayed as a member of Columbia since 1991. Brinkley has four other affiliations with/as, the Chairman of, Board of Trustees, The Century Foundation, 1999- present; Chairman, Board of Trustees, National Humanities Center, 2003-present; Trustee, Oxford University Press, 2009-present; Trustee, The Dalton School, 1999-2005. Along with affiliations and …show more content…

With that being used, FDR would use World War II and the New Deal to turn the look of progressives and instead of turning them into a movement wanting to reshape capitalism into “New Deal Leftism” who would instead of getting rid of capitalism would make use of its power for the welfare state and other government uses.
Brinkley’s thesis, is clear as it basically states that the FDR’s New Deal, is not the beginning of the major reformation in the United States but that it is what puts an end to the progressivism drive to reform. Brinkley also states that it argued that the federal government to interfere with the capitalism going around.
Brinkley writing has a way of capturing the reader’s attention and taking the reader inside the New Deal and how it was brought up and put into use throughout FDR’s term. With the New Deal frequently being showed as a plan that FDR had for getting the United States out of the Great Depression; The End of Reform, is an honest correction to this that brings a fresh look to the FDR’s

Open Document