Aggression, And Prejudice Concepts In Children Of Men

1638 Words4 Pages

Pro-Social Behavior, Aggression, and Prejudice Concepts in Children of Men

I watched the movie Children of Men for my paper. This is a movie about an infertile world and the United Kingdom’s police state during the year 2027. The movie starts off with a news station playing in the United Kingdom, the last place where there is any type of functioning government at this point. Everyone watches and listens in despair about the death of the world’s youngest man, “Baby Diego” Diego Ricardo who was “18 years, 4 months, 20 days, 16 hours, and 18 minutes old.” In this world the people are living in is in a state of complete chaos. The government has made it law that every woman is subject to tests for fertility as no one is able to have children …show more content…

Social learning theory is the idea that we learn attitudes, values, and in this case behaviors such as aggression by seeing other people act a particular way in a social situation. Frustration-Aggression Theory is the idea that frustration increases the probability of aggression. Throughout the entire story we see social learning theory taking place. In the beginning we see everyone crying over the world’s youngest man dying, something that is unanimously valued due to societies current state of infertility. In the bulk of the movie there is emphasis on the attitude towards immigrants, again this is something that has clearly occurred due to the state of their environment and the way people around individuals are acting. What struck me as interesting was the extent of aggression that occurs surrounding something so innocent as a child being born. It is made clear that the world is in turmoil, there is Theo’s kidnapping, explosions happening, and constant gunfire in the background of most scenes. The individuals and groups in this movie have learned through social learning theory that since the government is using violence against the people they govern, that the most effective way to fight back is to fight fire with fire, aggression is met with more aggression. The most interesting part to me was how increasingly aggressive everyone became when their goals were threatened, which is the frustration-aggression theory at work. The more difficult it became for the Fishes to obtain Kee’s baby for their movement the harsher they became towards the source of their frustration, which in this case was Theo. This is also seen in the same scene as mentioned above. In the middle of taking Kee and her newborn from Theo, gunfire breaks out all

Open Document