After The Quake

1171 Words3 Pages

There are certain ‘big questions’, questions on purpose and meaning, questions on life and death, that constantly hang over humanity. Some people go on with their day to day lives either blissfully unaware or choosing to hide in naivety. But for others, these questions can become a consuming struggle, something that drives their every moment. Murakami, in After the Quake, writes stories about the second kind of people. These questions that Murakami has his characters struggle with are hard to tackle in such brief, condensed works as short stories, but by giving the elements of the story several layers of meaning and interpretation he is able to unpack the idea more fully and set the reader on the right track to begin unpacking the stories …show more content…

He does this primarily by blurring the line between reality and fantastic. Often, the same tangible thing that stands for an intangible emotion, also suggests a magical interpretation. In “Landscape with Flatiron,” Miyake’s comment that “Premonitions can stand for something else sometimes. And the thing they stand for can be a lot more intense that reality,” invites the question of what he really means by premonitions (42). This first suggestion in “Landscape with Flatiron” of a possible element of magical realism shifts the readers perspective of the events and elements. In “UFO in Kushiro,” Komura has a sudden realization: “I was supposed to be holding this when I got off the plane. That’s how they were going to recognize me. How did they know who I was?” (11). This also suggest a sense of fantastic happening, but doesn’t confirm it. There are reasonable explanations but it invites the interpretation of something unrealistic happening as well. The line is so frequently blurred in After the Quake, that when Murakami does truly cross over into magical realism he blatantly states it. This is seen in “Superfrog Saves Tokyo”, where Frog tells Katagiri that he is “a product neither of metaphor nor allusion” (94). This blurring of reality can be seen as a form of duplicity itself. Things that are real stand in for things that are not, and vice versa. Constantly having to be alert to shifts in reality creates a sense of instability within the

Open Document