African Culture In The Poisonwood Bible

1314 Words3 Pages

Barbara Kingsolver’s The Poisonwood Bible, a novel that explores the fraternization of African culture with foreign ones, states that “No other continent has endured such an unspeakably bizarre combination of foreign thievery and foreign goodwill [as Africa].” Similarly, Nigerian-born Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart examines the “foreign thievery” of the well-developed village, Umuofia, by the European Christians as they gradually colonize on the African continent and “steal” Umuofia by replacing its culture with their own. By defamiliarizing Christianity and the Western perspective, Achebe asserts that African culture is not primitive. Achebe, vigilant and aware of the Western influence of his audience, ensures that readers first see …show more content…

The first half of the novel develops customs, religious beliefs, and governmental systems of a functional society and presents the Umuofians’ open-minded views to readers. Obierika’s brother reveals an enlightened, nonpartisan view of a neighboring village’s disparate customs when he says that “what is good in one place is bad in another place” (Achebe 74). Despite lack of exposure to Western culture, the Umuofians already exhibit nondiscriminatory beliefs and a level of tolerance that Europeans historically struggled to achieve. Umuofians also do not engage in war unless they have valid reasons to do so, which is evident in the beginning of the novel when “[Ikemefuna] was sacrificed to the village of Umuofia… to avoid war and bloodshed” and continues through the end when one of the Umuofian leaders declares that “it is not [their] custom to fight for [their] gods” (Achebe 8, 158). In this way, the Western perspective is culpable of hypocrisy since it debases the African culture that avoids war, calling it “primitive,” but they themselves have historically engaged in unjust wars. Additionally, Umuofian religion stems from logic since it is based off …show more content…

Although religion is not monolithic, Achebe focuses on certain aspects of each religion and expurgates others to convey the similarities between the cultures and that African religion measures closely to Western religion, so it therefore cannot be called primitive. When a Christian man, Mr. Brown, meets with the Umuofian leader Akunna to discuss their respective religions, they surprisingly have a productive and civil discussion. As Mr. Brown, the only compromising Christian, talks to Akunna about each religion’s supreme God, he says that “Chukwu (God) is a loving Father and needs not be feared by those who do his will,” while Akunna responds that “[they] must fear Him when [they] are not doing His will” (Achebe 181). Ironically, Mr. Brown’s description of a loving God excludes the aspect of fear that Akunna mentioned, which conservative Christianity emphasizes in its teachings. Each culture’s religion differs in belief due to the different environments surrounding each culture, which in turn affects what they do not know and what they fear. Mr. Brown’s focus on the love of God emphasizes that for European Christians, religion is more of an addition to their lives rather than essential because they have a larger understanding of science and technology and greater access to the necessary resources for physical survival. However, Europe’s

Open Document