More handpicked essays just for you.
Advantages and disadvantages of action research
Explain the purpose of action research
Advantages and limitations of action research
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Research is systematic way to find out facts and knowledge as Kothari (2006) has analyzed that research is the pursuit of truth with the help of study, observation, comparison and experiment; the search for knowledge through objective and systematic method of finding solutions to a problem. However there are two types of researches one is by Purpose and other is by method. The type by purpose falls into three categorize such as Basic, Applied and Action Research. Basic Research: Basic research is mainly concerned with generalizations and the formulation of theory. It is driven by curiosity or interest in a subject. The main motivation is to expand man’s knowledge, not to create or invent something. Many scientists believe that basic research …show more content…
Strengths of Action Research: 1. It is a practical way for individuals to explore the nature of their practice and to improve it. 2. Action research encourages practitioners to become knowledge-makers, rather than merely knowledge-users. 3. Action research proceeds through a process of planning, action and reflection upon action. This can be thought of as an action-reflection ‘cycle’. Limitations of Action Research: 1. Action researcher works in the hurly burly of her/his own practice. Monitoring closely, this practice as they act within it, demands space and time which, almost by definition, the practice does not give easily. It is therefore difficult to maintain rigor in data gathering and critique. 2. The process can be messy; as research proceeds, wider links are likely to be identified. 3. The result can’t be generalize usually as C.F. Hamilton (1981) also noted that this is true, but someone else’s ideas or conclusions can always be tried out by other persons in their own practice, to see if they work for them or
As Barbara Angus gives an account of her experience as an action researcher, she clearly shares the triumphs and defeats educators may encounter in the classroom. After reading the article, I particularly want to address the following research question: How can educators support students by introducing them to various sources that can address their inquiries as learners?
Reflection-in-action is a much more difficult skill than reflection-on-action as it often relies on tacit knowledge (Schön, 1983). Teachers are often confronted with uncertain and unique situations in their classrooms, as a result, spontaneous actions are utilised. Although, Greenwood (1993) argues that the role of reflection-before-action is downplayed by Schön, in teaching terms, good planning preventing issues. Although many issues may be averted during the planning stage, the unpredictability of children necessitate alternative
Participatory Action Research [PAR] is a “process concerned with developing practical knowing in the pursuit of worthwhile human purposes, grounded in a participatory worldview…. [and bringing] together action and reflection, theory and practice, in participation with others in the pursuit of practical solutions to issues of pressing concern to people, and more generally the flourishing of individual persons and communities”. (Reason & Bradbury, 2001). PAR is also context specific and strongly based
Parahoo (2014) refers basic research to as pure research conducted to develop, test and refine theories and generate new knowledge to help in provision of quality and effective health services to patients. In other cases, basic research is said to seek more knowldeg for knowdleg sakes. Basic research mainly makes use of animal testing to come up with new ways and medication
future actions and responses. In health, reflection is essential as it improves the actions of a
Rather, the goal of action research is that in involving all stake holders affected by the problem a situation appropriate solution can be implemented. Involving all stakeholders is essential in action research because it empowers participants to be active contributors to the improvement of their lives.(Stringer, 2014) Stringer (2014) explains that if there is no change as a result of action research then it should be considered unsuccessful. Thus, action research can become a continuous cycle of researching, implementing solutions and researching again based on the results. (Stringer,
Waterman, H., Tillen, D., Dickson, R., de Koning, K.(2001) ‘action research’ a systematic review and guidiance for assessment’. Health technology assessment. 5(23)
In my own words, research simply means to obtain as much knowledge about a particular subject as possible. Conducting research is just the process one goes through to obtain the desired knowledge. This can be as simple as figuring out which toys are the safest for children or as difficult as trying to find a cure for diseases. My experience with conducting research includes a paper from high school about the effect education has on wages earned and quality of life. Another example of research that I have done is the research paper I wrote in English 101 about corporal punishment. I remember both papers being fairly challenging because of my lack of experience with conducting research and writing research
Research, is a process of building up a new concept or testing an existing theory (Cohen et al, 2000). Sikes (2003) adds that research is a method of investigating something intensively, carefully, closely and critically in order to discover a new theory or to confirm or reject previous assumptions.
Action research is defined by Bridget Somekh (2005, p.89) as “directly addressing the problem of the division between theory and practice”. This is a great definition as that is the core of action research, putting research into action and deriving action from that research. However, another important aspect is the utilization of people and using people for research purposes. These aspects are stated by Dick ...
In conclusion, this activity has expanded my awareness of the importance of theories in practice as well as developing new skills and learning how to evaluate my work through use of a reflective model.
When I was reading the “Reflective model” I found out the connection it has with the action research. As said by Wallace (2001) the process of reflection should be formalised, as it were, and the classroom teacher should also become a researcher. But, to go to this point, which requirements does it need? We know the act of researching properly requires a set of abilities, akcnowledges, time, resources, among others issues. What Wallace (2001) suggests is that teachers might be more interested in a type of research which is more under their own control and which might also be more relevant to the classroom, i.e. what is often called “action research”. Now, what is it about and what does it need?
...em or concern, collect data, evaluate data, and create action strategies, share results with other participants and reflect-ing. Action research may use both quantitative and qualitative research to assist the researcher in analyzing their research, as well as providing a variety of ways to work differently in the school setting.
Research philosophy, refers to the development of knowledge adopted by the researchers in their research (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009). In other words, it is the theory that used to direct the researcher for conducting the procedure of research design, research strategy, questionnaire design and sampling (Malhotra, 2009). It is very important to have a clear understanding of the research philosophy so that we could examine the assumptions about the way we view the world, which are contained in the research philosophy we choose, knowing that whether they are appropriate or not (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009). According to Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill (2009), three major ways of thinking about research philosophy are examined: ontology, epistemology and axiology. Each of them carries significant differences which will have an impact on the way we consider the research procedures. Ontology, “is concerned with nature of reality”, while epistemology “concerns what constitutes acceptable knowledge in a field of study and axiology “studies judgements about value” (Saunders, Lewis and Thornhill, 2009, p110, p112, p116). This study is intent on creating some “facts” from objective evaluations which are made by the subjects. Therefore, epistemology will be chosen for this study as the way of thinking about the research philosophy.
is a disciplined process of inquiry conducted by and for those taking the action. The primary reason for engaging in action research is to assist the “actor” in improving and/or refining his or her actions.