Adultery In The Middle Ages Analysis

2087 Words5 Pages

The twelfth century was where significant changes were beginning to take place. Self expression in religion and sexuality between men and women was on the rise. People wanted to explicitly or implicitly seek greater access to God, as well as greater control of their own bodies. This resulted in the church demanding some sort of religious and sexual conformity. In doing so, the church wanted to establish its dominance in the moral and spiritual lives of the people it constituted. It began by taking the lead in prescribing what sexual acts people can indulge in and regulating where, when and with whom sex could take place. Sexual sinning then became of importance, and a controversial sin in the Middle Ages was adultery. Adultery as a sin was
In his essay, “Playing by the Rules: Sexual Behaviour and Legal Norms in Medieval Europe,” James Brundage speaks about the reality of adultery and how it was seen as something as not as a sin, but “normal” during the Middle Ages. Brundage states: “The rules that prohibited fornication between unmarried partners and adultery between married persons were so widely disregarded that ordinary people could, and frequently would treat it as universal.” (Murray 24) The people of the Middle Ages genially found it difficult to believe that such everyday and natural behaviour could ever be considered sinful, much less mortally so, and the opinion that fornication was no sin was appears heavily during this time. (Murray 24) Another issue with the church labelling adultery as a sin was that since it occurred mainly behind closed doors and in private, the only witnesses were usually the people involved in the sinful acts themselves. Therefore, adultery was extremely difficult to prove, unless the participants confessed for their sins, which was a rare occurrence. (Murray 27) To these supposed offenders, they felt no need to get themselves in trouble for something that they believed should be tolerated. Sexual crimes often remained unpunished because of this. (Murray 27) Moreover, the fact that the church tried so hard to crack down on fornication and adultery, proved that both were very
The priest then devises a plan along with his lover to satisfy their sexual desire. The tale begins: “How a chic woman in that city,/ who was well mannered and quite pretty,/ had summoned the priest and made it known/ her husband would be out of town/ that day at market, honestly,/ and told him just when she'd be free.” (9-14) This meeting between the wife and the priest shows the ecclesiastical institute of marriage and how sinful women were by provoking the men. (Murray 204) Though adultery was more worse when committed by a woman than a man, and this is because they were more inclined to lust and sexual excess than men. (Richards 36) Though adultery was tolerated at times, women still had to hide their schemes just in case. Once the husband arrives back home, the priest shakes with fear so forcefully. (61) However, the priest is more afraid of the husband than he is of God. This is because adultery due to desire of sexual pleasure was considered more of a venial sin than a mortal one, it did not break his relationship with God. (Payer 118) Even after the husband is now aware of the priest's presence, the wife and priest still wish to satisfy their desires, so they come up with a bet: “'I'll bet', the priest says, 'and won't lose'/ 'What will you bet?' he asks. 'A goose,'/ the priest says, 'I leave it to you.'” (119-121) He figures out

Open Document