Accumulator Case Study

726 Words2 Pages

Originally engineered in 2002, Accumulators, also known as knock out discount accumulator contracts, consist of a year of daily up-and-out long call options and twice the amount of a year of daily up-and-out short put options. Strategically placing the up-and-out call and puts forms a strike barrier below and a knockout barrier above the underlying’s price at contract formulation. Fok et al (2012) recognize that knockout percentage, discount percentage, market trend, and price variability generate the most critical effects on profit and loss. Therefore, to quantify how profitability vigorously changes, these metrics are manipulated in the study. The knockout percentage indicates the spatial distance the knockout barrier is in comparison to the underlying’s price. When the price of the equity is greater …show more content…

In each case, regardless actual or simulated data, when the contract knocked out early, profit ended positive. While in scenarios where the accumulator continued through duration, profit was continually negative. Using actual data, a 4.5% knockout yielded a positive profit, however, a 10% knockout returned a large negative loss. Fok et al (2012) went further to enhance their study by comparing various knockout percentages (2-7%) and discount percentages (4-15%). They found that lower knockout percentages and higher discount percentages yielded the highest cumulative profits. Market trend severely affects knockout percentage, discount percentage and standard deviation showing that accumulators offer a reasonable investment for investors in a neutral or upward, yet when the market trend is downward, accumulator contracts become substantially more dangerous. Concluding findings show that accumulator contracts are an unfair investment due to their limited upside profit potential and unlimited downside loss potential (Fok et al,

Open Document