Abolitio Memoriae In American History

940 Words2 Pages

Abolitio memoriae has been described as wiping out all existing memory of an individual from the public face. This process involved withdrawing any form of legacy, successes, and triumphs from the public for eternity. According to Victor Davis Hanson, Abolitio memoriae is the damnation of an individual’s memory. As described in the text, Abolitio memoriae is also referred to as damnatio memoriae and thus the connotation of the damnation of an individual’s memory for eternity. An individual in power in history was highly regarded for their deeds and triumphs, however, following a damnation of their memory, any commemorations of their time in power would be wiped out from existence. This exercise, carried out self-proclaimed moralists, would …show more content…

While there are visible differences between the past and the present, it does not necessarily signify that the modern citizen and leader is not at fault over the current social movements happening across different regions. Perhaps then, Hanson relates the different instances through viewing the past through the eyes of a modern man who considers himself as a more morally upright man. In fact, rather than viewing and crucifying the past leaders from an individual perspective, Hanson indicates that the modern person considers evil as evil without further research of the past realities. Consequently, Hanson indicates while these past leaders were outright evil, there should be a differentiation of each individual such as Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky, or a differentiation between Stalin and Hitler. Hanson states that the differences between such individuals as General Wade Hampton and General John Mosby should be seen as they are and not under the same morality

More about Abolitio Memoriae In American History

Open Document