Aaron The Moor Character Analysis

457 Words1 Page

When Shakespeare wrote Titus Andronicus, the issues of race were at their peak. It was the time where blacks were seen as barbarous and villainous, and that is exactly what Shakespeare gave his audience when he presented the character Aaron the Moor. Unfortunately white Europeans did not sympathize or connect with this character, mostly because Aaron seemed to symbolize the black population as a whole. Shakespeare makes it very clear that Aaron has a hard time of gaining the likeness and approval of not only the audience, but also the characters in Titus Andronicus. In his article, Uddalak Dutta states that “Shakespeare seems to attest that “blackness” is, indeed, not merely skin-deep but an essential character trait” (927). Aaron’s characterization is one that cannot be matched by any other character in Shakespeare’s plays. Aaron embodies the characteristics of …show more content…

To be more specific, Aaron is a product of his environment. He is brought up in the Goth and Roman cultures, and similar to the European cultures, Moors were still seen as “outsiders.” Dutta further explains in his article, “Without any cultural lineage, he must assert his identity only in terms of what the “civilized‟ Romans take him for. His bestiality is the only means by which he can define himself in the white society” (Dutta 929). Something important to note as well is that although Aaron is seen as one of the main villains along with Tamora, it is not him to does the majority of the violent acts in the play. According to Dutta, "Aaron is not really the "chief instigator" of the numerous acts of violence in the play. His primary motive is not unqualified malignity, but a desire to rise above the station that the white society has reserved for him" (930). Aaron delivers a monologue in the play that depicts his true feelings and allows for the audience to understand why Aaron does the things he does. He

Open Document