Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Competition and predation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Competition and predation
Introduction
Competitive interactions between species have long been a topic of interest to ecologists (Goldberg & Barton 1992). They are especially interested in how competitive interactions influence the structure of natural communities and their abilities to evolve competitive abilities (Goldberg & Barton 1992).
Competition is often responsible for the natural distribution of species, as one species will move away from an area where another species with similar requirements occur, since there is a clash in the resources they use (Connell 1961, Tilman 1987).
Other factors that influence the distribution of species and interspecific competition are weather, predation, intraspecific competition, disturbances and the characteristics of the competing species themselves (Connell 1983). The aim of this study was to see how the characteristics of competing species affect the outcomes of competitive interaction. What happens when values for initial abundance and alpha values are increased?
Methods and materials
A model was built in Vensim to represent two imaginary interacting populations. To incorporate the effects of the one species on the other, the following Lotka-Volterra (Begon et al. 2009) equations were used:
Effect of species 2 on species 1: dN1/dt= r1N1 ((K1- [N1+α12N2])/N1)
Effect of species 1 on species 2: dN2/dt= r2N2 ((K2- [N2+α21N1])/N1)
Where N is the number of individuals in the population, K is the carrying capacity, α12 is the effect of species 2 on species 1, α21 is the effect of species 1 on species 2 and r is the rate of intrinsic increase (Begon et al. 2009).
The initial values used for the parameters were: r1= r2=0,1 ; N1=N2= 50 ; K1=K2= 100 ; α12= 0,5 ; α21= 0
To see whether these results are accurate, a ...
... middle of paper ...
...nterspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus. Ecology, 42(4), 710-723.
Connell, J. H. 1983. On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. American Naturalist, 122(5), 661-696.
Goldberg, D. E., & Barton, A. M. 1992. Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: a review of field experiments with plants. American naturalist, 771-801.
Tilman, D. 1987. The importance of the mechanisms of interspecific competition. American naturalist, 769-774.
Yee, D. A., & Skiff, J. F. 2014. Interspecific Competition of a New Invasive Mosquito, Culex coronator, and Two Container Mosquitoes, Aedes albopictus and Cx. quinquefasciatus (Diptera: Culicidae), Across Different Detritus Environments. Journal of Medical Entomology, 51(1), 89-96.
Yes my prediction was correct this is because the Semibalanus barnacle species overgrew and killed off the Chthamalus barnacle species becoming less abundant. The Semibalanus barnacles that were transplanted became more abundant.
Intro: Charles Darwin’s natural selection comes to mind when viewing the aggressive behaviors in crickets. This interaction comes into play specifically when competition for resources, such as foods and females, are scarce. Thus, only the organism most fit in the environment would be allowed to survive and pass on its genes. Pioneers of animal behavior, pave the way to understanding the why animals act the way they act (von Frisch, 1967; Lorenz, 1952; and Tinbergen 1951). With further integration between different biological organizations, we see the rise of new possible research, especially in crickets (Wong & Hoffman, 2010). The house crickets, Acheta domesticus, would normally display little to no aggression between males because of their natural behavior to live in groups. But when isolated for a length of time, ag...
In conducting my research, I observed activity on a rocky shore off the coast of Washington in the Northwest United States (workbook). This environment inhabits 10 species in shallow water nearly on top of each other. Each species helps form a complicated ecosystem where species protect, consume, and compete for space with other species. Out of the 10 species there are three producers, three sessile consumers (otherwise known as filter feeders), and four mobile consumers- one of which is an invasive species. In this environment the producers are Nori Seaweed (Porphyra), Black Pine (Neorhodomela), and Coral Weed (Corallina). Producers make their own food through sunlight, so only have predators and competition for space. Coral Weed is the strongest
Soule, Michael E et al. “Ecological Effectiveness: Conservation Goals for Interactive Species.” Conservation Biology 17.5 (2003) : 1238-1250.
For a species to survive and flourish within a given environment, it not only needs to replace itself but also all the other species around it exclusively. Hence, if one species completely replaces another species, the result is a single dominant species, a monoculture (source 2). According to Gause’s law, every species in a given environment occupies different niches for survival. Therefore, two separate species competing for similar resources cannot fundamentally coexist (source Gause). This is known as the competitive exclusion principle. When comparing animal niche’s to that of different autotrophic plants, one can rather easily differentiate adequate ecological niches for the animal species merely based on food-requirements (P.J. Grubb). On the contrary, many autotrophic plants contradict the competitive exclusion principle by sharing similar ecological niches such as sunlight, carbon dioxide, water, and alike mineral nutrients (p.j. grubb).
Competition and predation are two key factors that affect the stability of an ecosystem, such as a lake. There are three theories on the affects of competition. Competition may lead to competitive exclusion, stable coexistence, or niche differentiation. It has been shown that in marine environments, species are strong competitors for both light and nutrients and thus competition leads only to competitive exclusion (Passarge et al. 2006). The competitive exclusion principle states that if two species compete for the same resource in the same location, then one of those species will go extinct because one species will be the better competitor (Jenson 2010). Another factor in ecosystem diversity is predation. The predator and prey relationship is a complicated one. Populations go through cycles of high abundance and low abundance. Many data seem to indicate that predators are able to reduce prey populations in density-dependent situations (Freeman 2008). One example of this is the study of the snowshoe hair and the lynx. This study proved that the hair populations and the lynx...
It is important to note that not all forms of interaction, mutualism or symbiosis are synonymous with coevolution. It is easy to believe that all mutualistic relationships are due to coevolution, for example animal seed dispersal, but this may not always be the case as the animal may have entered the plant’s habitat with previous dietary requirements and just began feeding on the fruit of the species that suited it best (Janzel, 1980). So how do we determine when it is in fact coevolution? This is done through careful observation, experimentation and phylogenetic analysis. When observing a potential coevolutionary phenomena it is important to ensure the response between the species is indeed reciprocal and not due to environmental factors such as climate, nutrients or pH. Experimentation is a useful way of checking whether an adaptation is due to an environmental factor, some other influence or the species in question. Researchers will study the same interspecific interaction across a number of different communities and continue experimentation over a long period of time to ob...
...lts in an increasing population of non-native species, which in turn might oppose a threat in the years to come to the number of the native specie populations of the islands. Zimmerman et al. described that the islands’ “forests seem to be balancing between two opposing factors”, meaning that the native and the non-native plants are competing for space in their common ecosystem (1).
A Population in an ecological perspective refers to a group of organism that are of the same species interacting with one another and their environment. For these organisms to be classified as the same species, they would need to be able to interbreed with one another. A population can consist of animal, plants, bacteria, or any other organism that are able to reproduce and live together. Metapopulation is defined as a set of local populations occupying a range of habitat patches and linked by the movement of individuals through migration. There are small “island” patches that are within dispersal distance of a larger “mainland patch.” When organism migrates to the poorer and smaller “island” patches, this explains source-sink dynamics. Without
On the first level, when foreign, but previously non-invasive species is first introduced to a new area, the new species may play a role in a community that was previously unfulfilled; it may fill a vacant niche in the ecosystem. Originally this new species may be seen as a useful contributor to its new surroundings because it has only (temporarily) increased biodiversity in the area (Meinesz, 2003).
According to Simberloff (1974), taxon cycle determines the rates of immigration and extinction of species, thus influencing the number of species present in the short-term equilibrium. Taxon cycle is also responsible for increased probability in equilibrium disharmony or sympatry in colonizing species as well as competition between species. The influences of taxon cycle on equilibrium is supported by various studies conducted on birds, insects and lizards.
A pair of equal sized birds of prey might overhunt an area and compete for food. However the Ecological theory shows validity in the idea that a territory is not overhunted because a small male will eat small prey while the large female hunts larger prey. However, it does not adequately explain why it is the female who would eat the larger prey or the bigger portion and be the bigger mate. It also does not explain why some species have smaller RSD than others such as the Screech Owl for
The distance that an organism travels can tell us something about their preferred habitat, how they reproduce as well as being a primary determinant of their likelihood to survive. Dispersal between populations influences the likelihood of colonisation and extinction. If extinction occurs in one habitat patch populations may be rescued by individuals from a nearby population. A ...
Interactions between organisms are called a biological interaction. Within these interactions, there are positive but also negative interactions that can be beneficial to some, harmful to the other and even neutral for the organism. The interaction between organisms can be break down to three big categories and amongst those categories, it can be break down to small subcategories.
All the phenomena above indicates that biodiversity, in other word, the variety of species, is the basis of those interactions among forest ecosystem. Any absence of one species in that huge ecosystem will result in negative effects on other related species. Meanwhile, any absence of the interactions among species will cause the dysfunction of forests and lead to deterioration of forests.