A Rose For Emily Vs. A Good Man Is Hard To Find

733 Words2 Pages

“A Rose for Emily” is a short gothic story by an American renowned author, William Faulkner. His book was first published in the forum on 30th April, 1930. In his book, Faulkner vividly describes the life of people in southern America. The second book “A Good Man Is Hard to Find” is a story which first appeared in avon book of writing in 1953 and written by Flannery O’Connor. This book was later edited by Phillip Rahv and William Phillips. Even though these two books were written by two different authors, these books contain some similarities and contrasts. The use of the southern settings in both these books involves some similarities and differences. In both the books, the southern setting is used to explain the social background of the characters. In the book, “A Rose for Emily” the southern setting is used to describe the Emily’s background. Emily and his family have been living in that area for a long period of time and hence she is having a hard time vacating to Florida. Emily is reluctant to change and says that she is well adapted to that town. From the whole story, it is evident that Emily was comfortable in her environment due to various factors. She was like many other women of the southern side. The author writes “The women mostly out …show more content…

In the book ‘A Rose for Emily’ the southern setting is viewed as being a place for the rich and that is why some of them are reluctant about living it. For instance, Emily comes from an Aristocratic family which had a lot of economic and political influence to the people. Landsman said that “On the other hand, in the book “A good Man Is Hard to Find”, the southern setting is set to represent the people from a lower social status in the society” (Landsman 562). Most of the characters are working in the fields to get their daily needs. This makes many people to stay in the town and work due to the profit they

Open Document