a. In the article “Supremacy Crimes” by Gloria Steinem the author states that its our white, middle class, heterosexual males that are to blame for a lot of murders. Steinem talks about how supremacy is like a drug to people. It makes them like that since they are more powerful or better then somebody, the can kill them. Steinem also says that the white male, middle class, heterosexual is the cause for most of the mass murders and sadistic killings. Steinem states later in the article that the country has a high rate for these types of killings because of the violence video games. Steinem states that America wont be able to reduce these violent crimes with out changing the view that males are more dominant then females. Steinem states that …show more content…
In this article Steinem starts by talking about a few murder cases. Then Steinem states that the reason a lot of these white males commit these crimes is because they think that they are superior and and that they can kill. Steinem uses actual murder cases and their facts to make the article factual. Steinem goes on to explain how supremacy is like a drug and that she feels like it is being abused.
Steinem uses Ethos in this article by using real life murder cases and crimes. Steinem includes the names of the criminals and dates the events took place. Steinem uses Pathos in this article by expressing her concern for supremacy. Knowing Steinem’s background in feminism I believe that she felt very strongly while writing this article. In this article Steinem uses Logos by taking the problem and creating a logical way to solve
…show more content…
In this article I feel like Steinem has a good point about the average American, white, middle class, heterosexual playing a huge role in murders. Researching the subject I found statistics to prove that mass murders are committed by the white male more of any other race. I do believe Steinem to have a very big bias because she is a very famous feminist, and has been for a very long time. In this article I think Steinem left out that the white, male, middle class, heterosexual have a lot of weight on there shoulders. I feel as if you see a middle aged white male and you think they have their ducks in row. They have a house, wife, children, a good job. If they don’t have those things they are looked down upon or judged. So that might have an effect on the fact they they are in the upper percentile of murders.
d. In my free time at work I used to listen to You-Tube documentaries on serial killers. I thought it was interesting and it passed the time. Looking back, I now notice that most of the serial killers were white males, middle class, and heterosexual. Without reading this article I probably would have never thought of the fact that most of the serial killers were in fact of that nature. This article just continues to prove that people can not judge people based on race, social status, or gender. There is more that goes on in a person’s brain then what they look like or how they might seem on the
La Donna Beaty clearly States in her argument, ?What Makes a Serial Killer?? her opinion and different theories on what causes a human being to become a serial killer. Beaty states that there are many serial killers and victims of them, but she is unsure about what causes a person to become a serial killer. Furthermore, she asked many questions, but there was no definite answer. For example, using examples of serial killers including Jeffery Dahmer and Ted Bundy, but only to draw up more questions. However, she wrote many expert opinions too, using them to her advantage in proving her argument, and giving a statement from a respected author and expert on serial killers named Ann Rule (pg315). Rule states that 3,500 to 5,000 people become victims of serial killers. She also states that 350 serial killers are at large in our society (pg315). Additionally, Beaty also presents an early theory that was completely incorrect. This was about how to identify a serial killer by looks. Beaty then gave her expertise by stating that a serial killer could look like or be anything they choose to become. They are most likely to be males and 92 percents are white (pg316). No doubt, that she appeals to logos by providing evidence about general characteristics of serial killers she quotes that in 1911, an Italian criminologist Cesare Lombrosco concluded that ?murderers as a group [are] biologically degenerate [with] bloodshot eyes, aquiline noses, curly black hair, strong jaws, big ears, thin lips, and menacing grins?.
The main claim of the article is that African Americans have been treated unfairly throughout history and are still being treated unfairly compared to Caucasians. One of the reasons given in support of the claim is “In the early 20th century, civil rights groups documented cases in which African-Americans died horrible deaths after being turned away from hospitals reserved for whites, or were lynched — which meant being hanged, burned or dismembered — in front of enormous crowds that had gathered to enjoy the sight.” (Editorial Board, screen 3) Another reason given in support of the claim comes from the late Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. saying “The dead have something to say to a complacent federal government that cuts back-room deals with Southern Dixiecrats, as well as to every Negro who has passively accepted the evil system of segregation and who has stood on the sidelines in a mighty struggle for justice.” (Editorial Board, screen 3) The argument consisted of several components such as quotes from famous activists and referring to historical events involving African Americans being victims. The components are presented in a certain order with the historical events coming first, the quotes from famous activists coming second, and the overall explanation of the Black Lives Matter movement coming
Serial murder, which is defined as “the unlawful killing of two or more victims, by the same offenders, in separate events”(Lubaszka & Shon, 2013, p. 1), is a term that American society has become quite familiar with. At a ripe age, parents begin teaching their children not to talk to strangers in hopes of shielding them from the potential evil our world has to offer, but what if I told you the serial killer may not always be the scary man driving a van and offering candy? Our society, like it does most things, has placed a stigma upon serial killers. Although not all implied labels are untrue, this stigma makes us vulnerable to the hidden deviance lurking behind us, dressed in sheep’s clothing. Over the course of this analysis, I will discuss and elaborate on Christine Lubaszka and Phillip Shon’s work, “The notion of victim selection, risk, and offender behavior in healthcare serial murders”. My evaluation will consists of a thorough description of Lubaszka and Shon’s article, followed by a brief critic explaining how their work relates to other forms of deviance, social control, and the material studied in this course, as well as stating a few of the drawbacks and benefits of the authors’ work and suggestions for future researchers.
Ta’ nehisi Coates wrote a letter to his son and one of the statements he made said, “I remember being amazed that death could so easily rise up from the nothing of a boyish afternoon, billow up like a fog.” The interpretation, “It is amazing how quickly death can overtake an African American male at any moment.” Eric Garner, a witness to this statement, and now a part of the Black Lives Matter movement. Black people are slowly divided by what really matters more injustice itself or injustice of a race that cannot and never existed. Have we become so blind that we forgot the many Sandra Blands that risked it all building the African American race? They then begin to categorize this as Black Women Matter. A parallel statement that not only applies to injustice but to black people themselves. Black men bash the bodies that birthed them and give them to the system to finish the job they have already started. If black women cannot be respected by their own what makes you think the next white man or cop will give them that
The author questions the fact, whether African American men are actually a criminal threat or a victims of society. “Black men are typically constructed as criminals when in truth they much more likely to be victimized by American Society” (BMCV, pg. 1). Most fail to realize that African American men can commit crime but they also can be victims of crime and a majority of the time they are the victims. Another idea he questioned is, why are more African American men considered to be perpetrators of crime rather than victims. “There is profuse media coverage of violent crime by African American men, however, the media pay disproportionately more attention to whites and women” (BMCV, pg. 2). The more the media reports on crimes committed by
Individuals become desensitized to certain things such as violence and bullying when they are overexposed to these things in their environment. Maggie Nelson in her essay “Great to Watch” explores the violence prevalent present culture. She claims that repeated exposure to violence make individuals desensitized. Desensitization to violence not only reduces responsiveness towards violence, but can also increase support for violence such as the event of Bernie Goetz, where Goetz shot four African American in the New York City subway. Malcolm Gladwell, in his essay “The Power of Context: Bernie Goetz and the Rise and Fall of New York City Crime” discusses the event of the Bernie Goetz incident to demonstrate the history of violence in New York
The goal of Hillary’s speech is to persuade her audience that her ideas are valid, by using ethos, pathos, and logos. Hillary is the First Lady and Senator, she shows credibility as an influential activist for woman rights. “Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children, and families. Over the past two and a half years, I’ve had the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my country and around the world” (Clinton 2).
When it come to the wrongdoing of serial murders the first thing people think of is that the offender is psychotic, white, abused as a child and experimented with animals. However that is not true, serial killers have different alternatives, motives and desires. Some are sexual sadist, act in necrophilia and are mission base serial killers. However people do not know that African-Americans consist of the largest racial minority group among serial killers, representing approximately 20 percent of the total amount of serial killers in America. (Bonn) Most believe that serial killers are white and other races are not likely to partake in that type of crimes. However two notorious well known black serial killers are Lemuel Smith & John Floyd
Staples successfully begins by not only admitting the possible faults in his practiced race but also by understanding the perspective of the one who fear them. Black males being opened to more violence because of the environment they're raised in are labeled to be more likely to cause harm or committing crime towards women but Staples asks why that issue changes the outlook of everyday face to face contact and questions the simple actions of a black man? Staples admits, "women are particularly vulnerable to street violence, and young black males are drastically overrepresented among the perpetrators of that violence," (Staples 384) however...
...unlike the research, data, and conclusions so it complicated the over all understanding of the article. Most of the findings are to be expected, at least for someone in the Justice field. The fact the most homicides and rapes are intraracial is not something the general public always understands but most people in the field of Justice understand that fact. After I read this article I decided to look up the authors to see if there could have been so hidden bias. Earl Smith is an African American man and Angela Hattery is a white female. After I knew that I still did not believe there was any bias in the article. The only part that could have possible been biased on its emphasis was the fact the rape and homicide are intraracial crimes but there was clearly represented by the data so it still did not look like there was any bias in the conclusions.
What most people would think is that only black men and women are killed by police officers. Yet this year there has actually been more white individuals killed by police officers than any other race. This is only a problem, because when you read about police killings it is almost all about how police target people of color. With this idea it makes it so that people of color feel more like a victim in the country and are then scared of police officers, who are supposed to be there to help. The statistic of white people being killed by police officers is not covered by the media, because it is not as intriguing or as controversial as the other stories. It is very important that people know that police killings as a whole is an issue not just police killing minorities. Using social imagination and looking at this problem you can see why you would not want one group to feel victimized, which would lead to them striking back at the people that are there to help
Each of a serial killer’s killings temporary gratifies whatever provokes the killer’s actions, and each subsequent killing terminates a separate sequence of behaviors. They are all motivated to for different reasons; some kill to gain or exert power over the victims, entertainment or mission. Some kill because they believe they have the responsibility to they society to do so (Julietta Leung N.D.) Frequently, homosexuals, prostitutes, and the homeless are viewed by serial killers because they might believe they are devalued in society or they view as being beneath humanity. They believe those kind of p...
Serial killers have many frightening facets. The most frightening thing about them is that experts still do not know what makes a human become a serial killer. Many experts believe serial killers become what they are because they have a genetic disposition or brain abnormality while other experts believe that a serial killer is created by childhood abuse; and some other experts believe that it is a combination of both brain abnormalities and abusive childhood experiences that creates a serial killer. A murderer is considered a serial killer when they “murder three or more persons in at least three separate events with a “cooling off period” between kills” (Mitchell and Aamodt 40). When defining a serial killer, their background, genes, and brain are not mentioned; perhaps one day those aspects of the serial killer can be included.
Hart discusses the article he read from the 1980s. These articles were designed to elicit fear in white Americans. The articles stated fallacies like black men became homicidal and were not affected by bullets. These types of stories are still heard today. The most recent example would be the reporting on the Michael Brown case, the media played on the fact that he was on THC and that he was invincible to the bullets, further feeding into the stereotype that black men are violent on drugs and bulletproof.
From the article, Davis’s main argument is that the mainstream society has developed the perception the black men are to blame for the