Stonehenge is without a doubt the most interesting and mysterious monument in Europe. In the passage the author informs the audience that Stonehenge is a way to let future generations to remember ancient civilization’s legacies. People who build those Stonehenge did not create those monuments to puzzle future generations, and they did not expect that future generations would be constantly puzzling and trying to figure it out. In the essay the author persuade the audience that man built megaliths is a way to resist his own mortality by using jargons, specific examples, and stylistic writing. The author applies technical jargon to strengthen his argument. In the passage the author puts in many jargon to persuade his audience, for example, “Stonehenge, they said, must have been a distant offshoot from the centers of Western civilization in the Mediterranean”(Aci, 18). The author informs the reader using specialized terms because it add credibility, and people who reads his passage would think he is an expert on archaeology. The audience will be more likely to be convinced because when he writes in obscure jargon, it is better than presented in simple and straightforward language. …show more content…
In the essay the author gives an example that “In 1945, an ingenious atomic physicist Willard Frank Libby and his students at the University of Chicago suggested that measuring the presence of a rare isotope of carbon might help date archaeological remains”(Aci, 24). Using evidence is very persuasive as it makes the reader see the author as knowledgeable and the argument as more logical or reliable. The author uses evidence to persuade the readers to accept his claim. By using evidences the author also gives a claim foundation to his arguments, and makes his writing more than a bare
The Parthenon embraces its beauty in human history , however , it imprisons its misuse and abuse in addition. In Christopher Hitchens’s , “The Lovely Stones” , he builds an argument to persuade the audience that the original Parthenon Sculptures should be returned to Greece . Christopher Hitchens uses negative diction , cultural references , and the rhetorical appeal , logos , to strengthen his argument .
As students we are taught that in order to have an effective argument, we need a claim, reasoning, and evidence. When comparing, “Two Years Are Better than Four” by Liz Addison, and “Colleges Prepare People for Life” by Freeman Hrabowski it was made obvious that the passage written by Addison had a more effective argument because of the passages claim that was clear to the readers, great reasoning and evidence that backed up her claim.
Howard Roark’s speech in Ayn Rand’s The Fountainhead displays the author's personal philosophy of objectivism. Objectivism is an idea that Ayn Rand had developed and promoted in her works of literature. Objectivism advocated for the rights of individual freedoms such as someone being able to do whatever that person desires with their own creations. In this case, Ayn Rand’s character Howard Roark; who had dynamited his own building . Through Rand’s persuading diction, immense detail, and powerful organization, Ayn Rand takes a stand through a fictional character to promote the idea that an individual should be able to live freely without society or the government scrutinizing him.
When I first encountered the word argument in this chapter I thought that I would be informed on what an argument is and how to construct an argument in an essay. After reading the chapter I think arguments much more than creating diversity over a topic. Also, it is much more than making a claim. There are many different styles and ways to present an argument.
Persepolis is a inspirational story written by Marjane Satrapi in the perspective of a young girl’s life during a powerful, historical moment in Iran. The Islamic Revolution was a life-changing moment that impacted her view on the world around her and her innocence shaping her into the woman she is today. Not many people understand what it feels like to feel pain, hurt and abandonment as a child from major and minor things. The author writes this story and decides for it to be a graphic novel to allow the not only young readers, but also for those who do not understand what happens everyday in the world they live in. Satrapi uses all rhetorical stances, ethos, pathos, and logos to show problems, purpose and emotions.
...’s book accomplishes a lot in its timid three hundred pages, it lacks more examples of modern architecture and historical landmarks such as the ones discussed above. Also, the lack of chronological order is a new approach, but it might not appeal to all readers.
In Alexander H. Stephens’s speech, “Corner Stone” was a speech directed to the Confederate states and those in favor of slavery highlighting the importance of black people not be equal to the white people. This speech is the foundation of the Confederacy implementing slavery. He announced to the crowds that the “new government” contradicts and goes against the foundations of the country. Stephen announces, “The new constitution has put at rest, forever, all the agitating questions relating to our peculiar institution African slavery as it exists amongst us the proper status of the negro in our form of civilization. This was the immediate cause of the late rupture and present revolution” (2). Here Stephen isn’t afraid to question the constitution
America has come a long way from the time of slavery, after the Civil war when slavery was abolished the southern Negro was having difficulty fitting in the normal “white” lifestyle. Passionate, expectant, and placid author Samuel J. Barrows approaches the southern Negro’s lifestyle and to expand on the differences between the quality of life before the Civil war and after during June of 1891. Barrows is striving to educate and expand on the difficulties that the Negro’s are working through in order to make their lifestyle equal to the whites to the other American citizens. Dedicated and confident Barrows is educating the American citizens, both Negroes and whites, but utilizing motivational imagery to give them a sense of hope, many different
“Anyone with gumption/ and a sharp mind will take the measure/ of two things,” states one of the Danish warriors in Beowulf: “what’s said and what’s done” (287-289). Beowulf is, above all, a poem about language, about storytelling: the stories told of the great ones, and the stories the great ones hope will be told about themselves. It is a poem about the importance of boasting and vows, the power of the word made flesh, and the crucial link between worda ond worca, “what’s said and what’s done.” The bulk of the poem's content does not concentrate on what is happening in the present action of the tale, but on the telling what has happened and what will happen. Through language, the Danes and the Geats state their intentions and define themselves as a people; they recall the past exploits that shape the present, and "a battle-scarred veteran, bowed with age,/ would begin to remember the martial deeds/ of his youth and prime and be overcome/ as the past welled up in his wintry heart" (2112-2115). Stories of times gone by and boasts of past accomplishments link the characters to their past; vows of deeds to come and the promise of glory after their deaths help to carry them into the future. As parallels between the past and the present are constantly drawn, the heroes use the example of earlier warriors in hopes of accomplishing the great deeds that will win them similar renown.
hat for a belief to be true knowledge, it must be supported by evidence. Evidentialism also claims
In paragraph eight it talks about Heinrich Schliemann mistakes and how they lead up to the lost of lots of clues to ancient artifacts . Some people such as Schliemann love for antiquities and learning were as strong for their love for attention and money. Heinrich Schliemann lied about some the discoveries he made too. The author said “he had been described as a trickster who did not always tell the truth”. “He was known for changing or making up details in his stories of discovery”.
Michael Green is an architect with a passion for designing skyscrapers globally. However, Michael possesses a unique interest in this industry which separates his work from the rest; Michael’s buildings are constructed with wood. Green’s thesis seems to be that wood is mother nature’s fingerprint, no two pieces are the same, and if you build it up properly it can create something so inspiring and beneficial. His talk is directed towards architects around the world, possibly even environmentalists who are exploring more sustainable ways of industrializing. In his TED talk Green successfully backs his thesis up by incorporating his family, examples, statistics, and counterarguments through the use of rhetorical appeals.
On May 20, 1996, TIME magazine contained an advertisement for the Mita DC-8090 copying machine. It included a vivid image of a very recognizable work of art, Stonehenge. TIME magazine is a weekly news magazine and its readers are educated and interested in current events, politics, business, science, and the arts. The text of the advertisement states, "The new Mita DC-8090 has the technology to manage complicated copying jobs from start to finish-it's fully automatic. Sunsets should be watched, not copiers." The advertisement utilizes the beautiful image as a setting to make the product look attractive and the text to suggest that the copier will save time and effort. It also assumes that the reader will associate Stonehenge with the sun and sunsets using common knowledge about this famous structure.
This poem describes a story told you by a passing traveler of a ruined statue of a king, Ozymandias, seemingly in a desolate desert. On the statue in is inscribed, “‘My name is Ozymandias, king of kings: look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!’/Nothing beside remain” (“Ozymandias” 10-12). Upon examination of the surrounding land, we realize that the once vast kingdom around the statue has been taken back by the desert, leaving the ironic message on the statue. This poem shows Shelley’s ideas of how all is temporary, especially mankind and our achievements. Showing romantic values, Shelley believed nature is much greater than man and no matter how big your kingdom, mather nature will always take back what was always
The mysteries of Stonehenge on the Salisbury Plains of England have perplexed human-kind since the beginning of recorded history. Some of the stones weighing as much as 40 tons were said to be transferred from Wales, which was a distance of about 137 miles. With the use of radiocarbon analysis at the site of Stonehenge it has been determined that the monument was built between 3000 and 1500 BC. The original purpose of Stonehenge has been lost in the pages of time, and therefore has been a major topic of discussion for archaeologists. Since the mid 12th century archaeologist, geologists, historians, and even some authors have put forth their own opinion of when and why Stonehenge was built. Throughout this essay I shall analyse and interpret different theories on Stonehenge in an attempt to understand what we know so far. It is in the mid 1100’s that we come across our first theory on Stonehenge, given by Geoffrey of Monmouth.