A Rhetorical Analysis Of Nate Beeler's Drawing By Adolf Hitler

564 Words2 Pages

Terrorism has been a worldwide problem this past year causing mixed feelings, anxiety, and more awareness. Political cartoons are said to be an exaggerating and categorizing opinion of a persons’ point of views. In the drawing by Nate Beeler, Trump is unfairly prejudicing Muslims which seems to be acceptable by Adolf Hitler. The exaggeration could be understandable, but the truth underlying it could just be the obvious. The artist gives the impression of saying Donald Trump’s statements and ideas leave him to be identified with Hitler. The work is representing the idea that Trump’s discriminatory views towards all Muslims, including innocent, is no different than Hitler’s ideas pertained to the innocent Jews, making them to be in the same category. The artist can cause so many opinions, emotions, and thoughts just by adding this simple character to his work.
Beeler’s history of numerous awards, degrees, and publications are a source of his ethos. His background shows that his art isn’t just an opinionated work of the political issues and events. He’s an experienced and educated man which makes the drawing more …show more content…

By using one of the most infamous dictators he causes attention to be brought to this cartoon. The rise of emotion can cause a scare because Hitler was somebody who ruined millions of people’s life in his country and to think that something can happen again especially near home could cause an uneasy feeling on people. Knowing the history of Hitler, from his concentration camps, to his prejudices view, or his immoral acts and behaviors, one would find Trumps comparison to him alarming. In the drawing Trumps speaks of getting rid mosques and making Muslims walk around with IDs. Not only did Hitler’s Nazi group cause the Kristallnacht, the night of Jewish buildings and synagogues burned and smashed, he also labeled Jews for

Open Document