A Rhetorical Analysis Of Mixed Relationship By Holly Nall

527 Words2 Pages

Every one want a partner who take care and can do anything for his or her. Many times we see that people marry different person in respect due their culture, race, religion, age, etc., and people wonder that why they marry or be in relationship with different person. This thing has been explained in this article Mixed relationship offers diversity by Holly Nall. She presents her point of view mainly in pathos but also some part of logos and ethos .This is merely considerable as wanted reader to think deeply about society and marriages. Everyone can relate this topic with themselves .But college student can take this topic to the next level .As in college students meet different people around the world. They learn a lot from each other like …show more content…

Some of the logical appeal is in the fifth paragraph of her article she tell us about a fact that in 1967 marring with someone different from one was illegal. Also, in last paragraph she explains why it is important to be in relationship who is different from one. It is important for one to understand it. From her personal experienced she already know that what the society and parents will think about her boyfriend Ron. Also, in her article she tells her personal experience like “On one of our first dates, as we were carded for our beers, he asked to see my license photo. We traded, and my eyes went straight to his birth year: 1970. I was mortified when I did the math. He looked great for his age, but he was a lot older than I had guessed”. In general, the article” Mixed relationship offers diversity “by Nall has used the ethos, pathos and logos merely effectively .As, at many points she should give logos and ethos to make her claim more effective. For example, she should tell what all things she learn from her Boyfriend and what where her ups and downs in her relationship. She can also give a research from an expert how the people live happily living even if they are different from each other. All this things might give a strong evidence for her article

Open Document