More handpicked essays just for you.
The analysis of the modest proposal by Jonathan Swift
Analysis of modest proposal by Jonathan swift
Child labour early 1800's
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In his essay “A Modest Proposal” Jonathan Swift makes the argument that eating the undernourished children of Ireland is just one way of helping to solve the economic crisis. Swift claims that children are useless and a burden to their families until the age of twelve, and says “they can very seldom pick up a livelihood by stealing, till they arrive at six years old” (584). He offers various arguments as to why turning infants into livestock is just one way of turning these burdens into something beneficial to the country. The suggestion to eat children is clearly anything but modest, but therein lies the beauty of Swift’s argument. His use of satire causes his readers to think more broadly about the issue Ireland is facing, as well as question …show more content…
He does this by namedropping various figures, such as “a principle gentleman in the county of Cavan,” and by backing himself up with statistics of the sheer number of poor children and families living in Ireland at the time (584). He says that there are about 120,000 children born to impoverished parents annually in the kingdom, after subtracting children who do not make it to birth or pass away within their first year (584). Readers are much more likely to trust an author should they present facts and figures to reinforce their claim. Though satirical, Swift wants his readers to listen to him, because in reality he is presenting much bigger ideas regarding the tyrannical rule of …show more content…
One such argument is that it would lessen the number of abortions (584). Swift claims that abortions occur because mothers cannot care for their children due to poverty, but he also thinks that abortion is a “horrid practice” (584). He argues that by eating infants, parents will have more money to care for their children and that those children won’t grow up to be thieves and beggars. Swift also makes the argument that introducing this cannibalistic practice will strengthen people’s marriages. He states that people will want to actually love and nurture their children, and husbands will be less inclined to beat their wives if their wives are essentially giving birth to money
The issue that was facing the Irish people was there were numerous Irish women, with their children in tow, begging on the streets in order to put a meal on the table every night. These women could not find work, and so they were forced to beg in order to provide food for their family and starving children. Jonathan Swift is making an argument to have these poor Irish women produce babies that at the age of one would be sold for a profit. The target audience is the poor Irish families that have too many children to be able to feed. This also targets the rich families of Ireland who will be the ones that will purchase the babies from the poor. The main point is to stop all the women in Ireland from raising so many children that they could not have enough means to be able to feed or clothe them all. The purpose is to help these Irish families that have too many mouths to feed and bodies to cloth already, and this will give them the opportunity to be able to sell their babies after one year and to even make a profit off them as well. The argument is structured first by showing the reader that there is a problem with the poor Irish families not having enough food to feed their quickly growing families. Then Swift moves on to talk about selling these babies to the Lords and wealth...
Pamphlets were often used to spread ideas throughout Ireland in the late 1600s, however, many were discarded and ignored. “A Modest Proposal,” by Jonathan Swift, uses the pamphlets to his advantage by proposing a ridiculous idea to show how messed up the state of Ireland was. Swift proposed that the babies of all the poor would “contribute to the feeding, and partly to the clothing, of many thousands” or in other words, improve Ireland 's economic problems and standard of living (Swift). His main reason for proposing this drastic idea was because women continued to have children they could not provide food or anything for in some cases and Swift’s idea would make the children “beneficial to the public” (Swift). For these reasons, Swift looks at not only the politicians to blame for the poor conditions but the citizens of Ireland as well. In “A Modest Proposal”, Swift uses harsh
This was mostly done by his descriptions of preparing the children like they are a chicken, and his list of advantages to eating children. While describing how to prepare a child Swift said, “a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food.” The manner in which he described a human child the same way one would a cow, chicken, or fish. The obvious lack of ethics and morals in this passage cement that this essay is satirical and should not be understood as a legitimate solution to the starvation issue. He later listed the advantages of a system that breeds children for food, these advantages are all very unethical simply based off the fact that they are benefits of eating infants. Swift mentioned ideas including the murder of Catholic babies, eating humans as a fun custom, and giving the poor something of value (their own children). His use of ethos shows the audience that the essay is satirical and emphasizes the extreme ridiculousness of his ideas.
For starters, in line 28, Swift writes about the horrors that overpopulation causes. He says, “There is likewise another great advantage in my scheme, that it will prevent those voluntary abortions, and that horrid practice of women murdering their bastard children, alas! Too frequent among us, sacrificing the poor innocent babes, I doubt, more to avoid the expense than the shame, which would move tears and pity in the most savage and inhuman breast.” This line is written as serious. It calls the death of babies a crime, and describes the “savage” and “horrid” infanticide; yet the thesis of the essay is about the systematic murdering and consuming of one year old children.
“A Modest Proposal” and “Let Them Eat Dog” have a common argument that we are dealing with over population of humans and animals. Swift uses satire to make us think that he really wants us to eat babies. Foer tells us of people eating animals were not accustomed to. This can put an economical strain on everyone if we don’t use our resources wisely. Both of these articles may be elusive for some to read. Both papers touch on the topics of eating animals, economic issues, and culture.
He begins by sucking the readers in through addressing a very real problem; the proliferation of beggers accompanied by malnourished children. He mentions the ?deplorable state of the kingdom? where young children?s futures are so limited that they will either turn theives for want of work? or ?sell themselves? into slavery. As soon as swift has gained the readers? attention he switches into his ironic, methodical mode. He begins to attempt to appeal to authority through his mention of having ?turned (his) thoughts for many years upon this important subject. Before even mentioning what his intended proposal is, swift begins to speak in terms of computations and statistics and use diction to give the poor a sub-human quality in order to divert the attention from the horrific nature of what he is about to propose. Swift first hints that peasants are being treated as less than human by refering to a newborn baby as being ?dropped from its dam.? He then begins to refer t owives as not mothers, but ?breeders. After having almost entirely erased the human element of the famine, he then inductively introduces his grueso...
Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal” (1729), argues that in order to gain control of the overwhelming poverty and population problem in Ireland, a rational solution would be to turn to cannibalize the “bastard children” who have no means of survival. (Add in somewhere of how they would be eating poor kids who can’t be taken care of) Swift develops his argument by appealing to the reader with pathos, logos and ethos in many different ways. The authors purpose is to present his argument, for cannibalism in order to persuade the reader that it is a logical option that Ireland can take in the hopes to solve the poverty and economic problem. The relationship the author develops with the
Swift wants his readers to interpret his speaker as a kindhearted, sensible gentleman with a sincere concern for resolving problems for the Irish people. In the first eight paragraphs, the reader meets an affectionate man with precise insight into the predicament he will shortly address. By doing this, the speaker establishes himself up as someone who would not make an outrageous proposition. This makes his words even more effective.
This essay by Jonathan Swift is a brutal satire in which he suggests that the poor Irish families should kill their young children and eat them in order to eliminate the growing number of starving citizens. At this time is Ireland, there was extreme poverty and wide gap between the poor and the rich, the tenements and the landlords, respectively. Throughout the essay Swift uses satire and irony as a way to attack the indifference between classes. Swift is not seriously suggesting cannibalism, he is trying to make known the desperate state of the lower class and the need for a social and moral reform in Ireland.
Jonathan Swift’s proposal would not make sense ethically to its audience unless the reader had no value for humans. In this case Swift’s proposal would make sense and would be an acceptable proposal to resolve the problems of the poor in Ireland. The following statement, “I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will
He favors the poor and hopes that they will find a way out of their seemingly hopeless destitution, which is why he writes this pamphlet. He is knowledgeable in economics and societal functions, which gives him credibility in addressing the Irish people. His main argument is that babies should be eaten in an effort to make use of the poor. He assumes that his audience will be intelligent enough to analyze the satire of his piece and be willing to understand the country’s predicament. Jonathan Swift is a well-known author and satirist who graduated from Oxford University in England.
The issue is that there is a growing number of poor and starving women and children living on the streets of Ireland that are a burden to the public and the country. The context is that these homeless and starving women and children are left to fend for themselves on the streets. Jonathan Swift is making the argument from the point of a concerned citizen who has spent years among the poor in Ireland studying the situation and trying to come up with a solution. Johnathan Swift used the example that those who visit Ireland and see the streets crowded with women and children that are beggars conclude that Ireland is a very poor, overpopulated country full of beggars and that they look down upon their country that is in such poor shape. His bias is that as a citizen living in Ireland, he does not want to be looked down upon by other countries. His targeted audience seems to be the citizens of the country and those in higher up positions who ...
Swift explains how selling a marketable child will be profitable and why the people of Dublin are willing butcher children to survive. He does this by saying, “I rather recommend buying the children alive, and dressing them hot from the knife, as we do roasting pigs” (585). Swift uses verbal irony in a powerful way to state that Irish people should not be treated like animals killed as food. Swift points out the famine and the terrible living conditions that are threatening the Irish population by stating that children are a good source of food just like real animals do.... ... middle of paper ...
...erprivileged mothers who strive to take care of their children but do not have the resources to do so. Lastly, Swift states that for want of work, the children of the impoverished Irish “either turn thieves, or leave their dear native country, to fight for the Pretender in Spain, or sell themselves to Barbados.” Swift makes the reader feel sympathy towards the impoverished children who are forced to make a living for themselves by any means necessary at a young age. Swift’s use of gripping word choice to describe the living conditions of the impoverished Irish effectively puts both emphasis and pity on their situation while also making the reader despise those who do not care about the poor.
Readers see the theme of greed throughout the storyline. The upper class has a desire to reap in money and material wealth at any cost They are not concerned how this affects the lower class or society, their concern is to have the most they can and continuing to grow richer. They even put limitations on the land which prohibits the tenants to grow food. Swift’s proposition is written in satire to make ironic how ridiculous the level of greed is. Eating babies to solve the overpopulation and famine remarks an absurd level of greed. Perhaps it was the only way Swift could grab attention and make people see the greed in his proposition and trace it back to the current situation, “Swift’s satire can be so sharp and unyielding that he was variously judged to be insane, to have a disorder of the intellect”