A Modest Proposal Rhetorical Analysis

1507 Words4 Pages

INTRO
Jonathan Swift, the prominent satirical writer of the 18th century presents social criticism through his two essays of Hints in Conversation which draws opprobrium of societal faults in conversation and A Modest Proposal which illustrates the lamentable condition of Ireland in conjunction with an inhumane proposal. Both texts are comically fabricated to endure great irony and exaggeration in order to confront the audience of the 1700’s out of their complacent state to bring about improvement. Swift encourages and liberates his perception of an egalitarian world, with “no other motive than the publick good” enduring through both content differentiating essays in order for the audience to this contemporary day to improve themselves, thus …show more content…

Swift illustrates that when having a conversation, and attempting to better the other person by correcting their faults is the fault within its self. The advice intended for the audience is respect and humility, in order to allow individuals to connect and engage well. Swift accentuates the “hints” of conversation by outlining the “two chief ends of conversation” being to “entertain” and “improve” those we are among, or to receive those “benefits” for ourselves through his didactic shift in tone. Swift emphasises the “greatest” and “most lasting” qualifiers to better conversation, as he perceives women to create an element of “modesty” and “decency” among the “poor” and “pernicious” pleasures of men thus improving society. The contrast made between human and animal nature dehumanises society, as “men” and “brutes” are placed on equal value, mocking humanity in relation to the “lewd” and “profane” terms and phrases which degrade society. As the self assured Swift condemns the speaker via his condescending tone of voice, he inclines towards advising individuals to leave “room for answers and replies” in order to be truly valued and respected, in an egalitarian society of “love”, “honour” and …show more content…

The contrary title juxtaposes the content of being a “modest” proposal, as the anticipation of selling and eating young children in order to benefit Ireland’s economy is not a polite nor considerate gesture. Swift indicates his motive, through the contextual references and visual imagery of the “beggars” and “helpless infants” subjecting the reader to view the reality downfall of the Irish people’s deprivation and oppression. The paradox used to state humanity in Ireland as a “lawful occupation of begging” illustrates the situation they are facing with “labourers” and “farmers” categorised ironically as this “occupation”. The structure flow of this essay is gradually intensified, as the problem of the depressed economic conditions of Ireland, is supported through statistical evidence, which authenticate and reinforce the argument as the ironic “only”, in “there only remain a hundred and twenty thousand children of poor parents”, confront the reader as this number is large raising the issue of overabundance within Ireland. Swift’s mock serious tone of voice, is accompanied by a sense of superiority as he “proposes” his own “thoughts”, and “humbly” offers them to the public. This outrageous thought Swift conducts of killing, eating and selling the children

Open Document