A Modest Proposal

668 Words2 Pages

ALTERNATIVES TO CROP INSURANCE

Implemented by NGO
A noteworthy obstruction to the commercialization of the small farmer is the enhanced unpredictability of the market place, evaluated with subsistence cultivating. The issue is exacerbated by the fact that it has not as much of ability to absorb the peril of loss. Purchasing insurance policy does not appear to be a workable approach, as the rates to cover these risks appear to be too high. Thus, government, policy-makers, and insurance companies are engaged in finding a blend of subsidies (for reducing premium) and distinctive sorts of insurance products to resolve the issue. An alternative is possible, one that can be implemented by NGOs who will have a low transaction cost of providing …show more content…

In the alternative being proposed here, the farmer is called upon to make a payment only after it has been verified that the crop is good and the farmer has the ability to pay. Perhaps an even bigger advantage is the 'credibility' of the proposed arrangement.
As it involves quite a large amount of money and makes it possible for NGOs to enter into the business, insurance providers who have knowledge about individual insurance buyers (avoiding adverse selection) as well as being in a position to monitor them (preventing moral hazard). NGOs providing micro- finance have worked out innovative methods of doing both of these. In principle, therefore, the NGOs have a lower transaction cost of providing insurance cover to small farmers. However, the requirement of the paid-up capital makes it very difficult for the NGOs to become insurance …show more content…

The recent years have seen a change in this trend with the emergence and rising popularity of weather-based insurance products. Weather insurance pays indemnities based not on the actual losses experienced by the insured, rather on the realization of a weather index that is highly correlated with actual losses. The index measures a specific weather variable (e g, rainfall, temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, etc) rather than the extent of loss (in crop yield). In other words, the product proxies the loss that farmers face owing to the adverse weather incidence.
The weather insurance product is designed after a critical study of the weather parameters affecting crop growth in its three critical phases - sowing, growth and flowering, and yield formation to harvest. During each period, the "trigger" (level below which weather parameter must fall for a farmer to begin receiving the payouts) and "exit" levels (level below which the weather parameter must drop for a farmer to receive the maximum payout) are defined. No additional indemnity is paid for realized values of the index that exceeds the exit

More about A Modest Proposal

Open Document