When doing what a person love is not always the right choice. The author Gordon Marino wrote 'A Life Do What You Love', published in 2014 in The New York Times. He argued that a person should not do something one can be passionate about. Marino begins building his credibility with personal facts, citing credible experts to appeal to the readers logically and emotionally. However, in the beginning he uses anecdotes to appeal to logic and authority. Not only Marino used facts and opinions by other writers. He also discussed his own personal emotional to support his argument. But, towards the end he attempts to appeal to the readers logically using famous leaders as an example. This support his argument because it helps the readers better understand …show more content…
Marino uses famous leaders like Nelson Mandela, Dietrich Bonhoeffers, and Martin Luther King Jr. Marino disagree with having to do something you love because it is not reality. This where he uses appeal to emotion because he explains that sometimes putting your passions aside for the benefit to help a larger circle which could be family or society as a whole, but in a way it weakens the argument because he shows a lot of frustration of why some people do not understand the concept of doig things to help the people around them.. This keys in with the three leaders he used in this article. He used the leaders as to appealing logically. He explained that these leaders did not organize their lives around self-fulfillment, talents, or a bucket list. Each of them had one goal they wanted to achieve. The three leaders Marino discussed about did not do what they did in order to achieve that sense meaning. Which means the leaders did not wake up and say "Okay this is how I want the world to remember me by before I leave this Earth." Nelson Mandela, Dietrich Bonhoeffers, and Martin Luther King Jr did things that needed to b done, which even meant making sacrifices to help the society as a whole. This connect to appeal to logic and authority because he uses the three leaders by appealing to the reader or catching the reader's attention, for the people that have respect for leaders or know what something about what these leaders accomplished. But throughout the paragraph Marino said that most people would agree with Dr. King "self-fulfillment requires being able to relate yourself higher than others." This means a person being afraid to challenge their selves because they are afraid of
For instance, my interpretation of leadership has changed. I value the ideology that leaders come in many forms and possess diverse qualities. In fact, I perceive myself as a leader. Leading carries challenges, but knowing that leadership originates from the heart provides confidence for achieving. I enjoyed the concept of approval and the influence approval has on my life. Approval is from within, its love of true self.
Choose a job you love and you will never have to work a day in your life – Confucius
It's hard for me to read this essay and don’t be agree at least with most of what the writer states. I am aware of the great d...
...s is related to his philosophy about doing the right thing and about a being a good person. But it goes beyond this. He spoke often about having true compassion. It isn’t enough to help those in need, but we must truly care about them, to take a good look and see how they got that way. He asked us to examine how we as a society can change the conditions that led them to be there in the first place. Doing this makes us better as people. I have found that it also makes me feel better. Never give up on your dreams. While his life was cut tragically short, he died in pursuit of his dream and in spite of everything he faced, he never gave up on it. He faced obstacles I could never imagine having to face, and still persisted. This reminds me that the small things in my life that often seem insurmountable, are just my excuses for not taking action and are not obstacles.
What is incredible about nearly every great issue is that one individual can make a world of difference. Luther and the Reformation, Voltaire and the Enlightenment, Marx and Marxism, Darwin and Darwinism, Bolshevism/ Communism and Lenin, Nazism and Hitler, these are all people and movements that are mentioned together. In one way these issues and individuals are inseparable. There is a similarity between all of these famous individuals and the issues that they represent. Each one of them, in one way or another, has influenced today and the lives that we live. Each of these issues has enhanced history and the relevance of its studying. Put them together in a sort of time line, and one will be able to see what makes the world that we live in today. In fact these great issues are the foundation of today’s society, and to fully understand the society that we live in today we need to understand the great issues of yesterday.
In fact, it may be this same reflection that leads to an individual’s decision to prioritize practicality. Not all those who choose the practical path do it for themselves. Many may do it for their families, as a safe and stable means of supporting their loved ones. Others may take this opportunity to give back to their community through the ways they are most skilled. Instead of pursuing a single interest in a certain field, they choose to follow their callings.
Wolf argues that a person must feel something towards his or her project or activities and that the person must feel gravitated toward this project and it must excite them or they may be passionate about it. But, not all people feel the same way in what they do. It doesn’t necessarily mean that their lives are meaningless, just that they look at what they’re doing with a different perspective. The person might be (i) spontaneous in what they choose to do; the activity excites them but they like to do things at different times, (ii) unreflective or idle; they don’t really think about or are not self-reflective about their beliefs, (iii) episodic and has no long term commitments to their projects, or they may be (iv) detached in what they do and they may not love or feel passion towards anything they do. Each example is of a person who may not be passionate and not feel anything towards their projects but have at least some success in such activities. This person may do different kinds of work, help people, and admire art the same way normal people do just with less passion and excitement but with the same amount of success. It would not be fair to say this person’s life lacks meaning because they’re less
In Martin Luther King Jr.’s essay, A Letter from Birmingham Jail he compares the issues of Moral acts verses Immoral acts. This essay was written in response to a letter some clergymen had written after a direct action march Dr. King had participated in. In their letter the clergymen had praised the local police officers and media for the nonviolent and calm manner in which the situation was handled. It was this praise that prompted Dr King to write:
However, some people forget the original purpose of using blogs and want to become successful without hard working. Most people want to own a life like superstar so they post their private life in order to attract more attentions. It is not health for a people to seek into such a life in blogs. In the essay “ Buying the lifestyle”, the author shows us that a common situation in current society, which people excessive believe TV shows and advertisements. They want to gain wealth and status without any working. It is kinds of daydream and people lost judgment of those social media. It has similar situations of blogs that people dream that they become popular and lots of people focus on their life. Some of them try to create non reality events
I believe that unless you are passionate about an activity, an occupation, or a sport that you partake in, you should not pursue it, especially if you are choosing to do so for the sake of someone else. A person is only limited to a certain amount of years in their life, and each person is limited to a different amount, unknown to the individual. Therefore, if you participate in one of these things that you do not adore, you should not continue taking part in that activity, for it is wasting your time that could be spent finding yourself in something you love. That being said, if you happen to come across something you love, I believe you should indulge in that activity. It is rare to come across a hobby, occupation, or sport that makes you happy, and when you do find that activity, it is important that you engage in it for as long as you are able to.
Charles Bukowski once said in one of his letters “Find what you love, and let it kill you.” I strongly disagree with that. As a matter of fact, the greatest pleasure in life is being able to recognize what we really love and get to know how to live with it. Passions and dreams are what identifies our existence. If we were able to find them and concentrate on fulfilling them, we would realize that they are the only things that are worth living for. For instance, we probably can notice how an artist is always happier than an employee. Two persons: One devotes himself to his art and passion, takes each day as a new opportunity to make his talent more perfect than the day before. And the other one who wears ea...
...ed he was a visionary leader when he challenged the status quo of the Roman Catholic Church attempting to use change management. Through diversity, individual consideration, and intellectual stimulation, he changed the simple minded that led to a reformation. Secondly, this essay described Martin Luther’s struggle with the ethical leadership and critical thinking traits of principle, intellectual humility, integrity, personal biases and prejudices, ethical trap of relativism, and worry over image.. Finally this essay described how Martin Luther’s example related to me and my own hindrance in the bandwagon fallacy. In conclusion, while the facts state that he was not an ethical leader, it did prove that he was a visionary leader. Perhaps that part of his legacy is what inspired the name change of MLK Jr, the pioneer of the African American Civil Rights Movement.
Calling”it states, “Jobs come and go, but a calling is something you were given the moment you were born. She also states, “you can lose a job, but you can’t lose your calling” (2013). A calling is something you are drawn to. A calling is that strong inner impulse one has that lead you to that course of action, having that feeling of certitude, influence from deep down. When I was younger, my parents use to say“do what you like and live what you love.” Somehow over the years I did not stick to that rule, only glazing the surface of that saying.
Choosing a career is one of the most important decisions a person has to make in their life. It is so important because that is what we will have to do to support ourselves throughout life. Imagine being stuck in a dead end job and having to go to work every morning and dreading it. That is no spending oneÕs time and life is too short to work 35 years and be unhappy with it. If a person likes the job they do then it is not work, because finding satisfaction out of a job can bring great happiness. That information has enabled me to make the decision of choosing my area of study and career in the field of Information Technology.
Students find themselves asking, “What do I want to be when I grow up” “What colleges will I apply to” and “What do I want to do with my life?” these questions are very important in their lives and should be answered with time and deep thought. Once students receive their diploma from graduation these questions show their life in the real world. The future is all in their hands now and they must pick the right choices. When people turn eighteen they have many choices to start their life also. All these decisions that are being made by students are commonly life decisions. Although the life decisions of graduating high school and a new eighteen year old are often considered to be very different, they are quite similar when considering college, future career, travel, and responsibility.