Racism in the South has always been a very real and horrible problem. Ernest Gaines accurately describes the atrocities that black Americans experienced in A Gathering of Old Men. "Gaines's strength lies in his quietly companionate depiction of the plantation Blacks in his native Louisiana...." (Peden 239). The whites in the novel are the representation of the stereotypical white person in the 1970s. Gaines shows every white point of view towards blacks in this novel through the progression of the most backward to the most forward thinkers. Each white character in Ernest Gaines's novel, A Gathering of Old Men represents some different aspect of the stereotypical southern white person of the time. Gaines uses characters such as Beau and Fix Boutan to help cement the image that all while people wanted things the way they used to be. Although Beau never has a real part in the story, he is one of the main characters. His dead body "symbolizes the changing values and traditions that deprived [the blacks] of a way of living," while to the whites it symbolizes heritage and brotherhood (Babb 123). Beau is the personification of the stereotypical rural southern white male of the time. He treats blacks as though they are his slaves and he owns them. Charlie says, "he used to `buse me. No matter if I did twice the work any other man could do he `bused me anyhow" (Gaines 189). His treatment of Charlie eventually cost him his life. Fix Boutan and his son Beau hate the blacks and think that they are a race above them. Fix has a history of "taking the law into his own hands" (Galens 123). Everyone in Marshall expects Fix and his gang to come and lynch the whole group. The way that all of the people, black or white, talk of Fix, he is ... ... middle of paper ... ...e did not have to deal with racism. Gaines uses Sully's descriptions to relate the story to his readers that have grown up in a similar situation to Sully's. Showing the reader the different grade of whites racism in the novel helps Ernest Gaines relate this story to every white person. He uses characters like Luke Will, Fix Boutan, and Beau to show how evil and immoral some of the whites of the time were. Gaines wants the reader of his novel to get an understanding of racism and why it has to be done away with. Gaines wants the reader to think that it is not ok to be indifferent toward racism much like Tee Jack, and Jack Marshall are. He uses the more forward thinkers like Candy and Gil to show that even those aren't always good. He wants the reader to change their views and not see men for what is on the outside, but to see him for what is on the inside.
.... This factor ties in another theme of the novel, oppression. The novel informs the readers of how the African- American culture felt oppressed by the color of their skins and their status on the economic spectrum.
The transition of being a black man in a time just after slavery was a hard one. A black man had to prove himself at the same time had to come to terms with the fact that he would never amount to much in a white dominated country. Some young black men did actually make it but it was a long and bitter road. Most young men fell into the same trappings as the narrator’s brother. Times were hard and most young boys growing up in Harlem were swept off their feet by the onslaught of change. For American blacks in the middle of the twentieth century, racism is another of the dark forces of destruction and meaninglessness which must be endured. Beauty, joy, triumph, security, suffering, and sorrow are all creations of community, especially of family and family-like groups. They are temporary havens from the world''s trouble, and they are also the meanings of human life.
The novel The Garies and their Friends is a realistic examination of the complex psychology of blacks who try to assimilate through miscegenation and crossing the color barrier by “passing as white.” Frank J. Webb critiques why blacks cannot pass as being white through the characters Mr. Winston and Clarence Jr.
Gaines technique allows the characters to reveal themselves and their relations with others. We hear the story through the voices of the old black men, a black woman, a child, and the white narrators. We not only see the conflicts of the blacks, but also the conflicts of the Cajuns as well.
It also deals with the emotions that this black boy faces because he has been treated unfairly by the white people. Major Characters: Jefferson, black boy who is accused of a crime and sentenced to death; Grant Wiggons, teacher sent to help Jefferson. After he went and obtained a college degree, Grant Wiggins went back to live with his grandmother. Being that he is a very educated person, Grant was elected by his grandmother to try and get Jefferson to realize that he was a man and not an animal like the white people had led him to believe. Throughout the entire novel, Grant is battling this idea in his head because he doesn’t feel that even he knows what it is to be a man.
The author distinguishes white people as privileged and respectful compared to mulattos and blacks. In the racial society, white people have the right to get any high-class position in a job or live in any place. In the story, all white characters are noble such as Judge Straight lawyer, Doctor Green, business-man George, and former slaveholder Mrs. Tryon. Moreover, the author also states the racial distinction of whites on mulattos. For example, when Dr. Green talks to Tryon, “‘The niggers,’., ‘are getting mighty trifling since they’ve been freed.
At a meeting of the American Colored League, where turn-of-the-century Boston’s black citizenry, along with delegates from all over the country, have gathered to confront a wave of Southern lynchings, Luke Sawyer rises to deliver an impromptu speech detailing the brutalities of southern racism. Scheduled speakers at the meeting are the transparent representatives of these leaders: Du Bois in the figure of the radical philosopher Will Smith and Washington in the person of Dr. Arthur Lewis, the “head of a large educational institution in the South devoted to the welfare of the Negros” and a man who advocates peaceful accommodation with southern whites (242). Luke Sawyer takes the podium and begins to preach by criticizing the previous speakers (the corrupt Mr. Clapp and his lackey, John Langley) for their “conservatism, lack of brotherly affiliation, lack of energy for the right and the power of the almighty dollar which deadens men’s hearts to the sufferings for his brothers” (256). Rather than engaging in the rational debate form (as represented by Clapp and Langley), Sawyer passionately narrates a personal story of his own family’s suffering, a history in which his father is punished by a lynching mob for operating a successful black business in
But unlike Gregory’s tale, Wilkins’s story lacks figurative language. Though he does use descriptive language, like when he described what his white neighbors thought about him and his African American family moving in: “The prevailing wisdom in the neighborhood was that we were spoiling it and that we ought to go back where we belonged (or, alternatively ought not intrude where we not wanted.)” (Wilkins). The main problem is that there are no metaphors, similes, symbols, alliterations, and so on. But a strong point of this piece is that it is to the point. All the details he put in his story made sense and helped make his point of equality clear. One such example of this is when he describes his teacher Dorothy Bean, “I later came to know that in Grand Rapids, she was viewed as a very liberal person who believed, among other things, that Negroes were equal.” (Wilkins). This detail helps to establish her as a guiding force to help the other students see Wilkins as an equal. Another great strength in this story was its clear organization of the events that took place. It began with an explanation of the setting, how he was treated, how the teacher treated him, and ended with him being accepted by the other students. Everything was chronologically ordered and easy to follow, which also made it a more enjoyable
Push yourself. Go out of your comfort zone – it is how people grow. If everyone were to remain at the same level of comfortability and simply accept what comes plainly to the surface, the world would be a much less tolerable place. Oppression, though still found about the world would be much more prevalent, especially in places like America, where people have driven movement so that things change, to prevent the infamous saying of “those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it”. It is important to find a clear understanding of what one came from – the wonderful and painful – to determine what one wishes to become (Chadwick xiii). Twain’s American theme of the negro, criticizes a subject that has been engraved in American culture from the start, while employing an excess of additional American ideals. Though a close contender, The Great Gatsby falls just short of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn as it has become apart of the very culture it seeks to criticize. The discomfort that Twain’s narrative produces is indicative of the novel’s “greatness”. As David Smith concludes at the end of his analysis of the racism theme in his article, “Huck, Jim, and American Racial Discourse,” if as a society, “we, a century later, continue to be confused about Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, perhaps it is because we remain more deeply committed to both racial discourse and a self-deluding optimism
In his novel, A Gathering of Old Men, Earnest Gaines summons the readers into has world. Based in the 1970s, this coming of age novel talks about how the death of a white man, somehow bring old black men to come together. Two characters, Mathu and Charlie, encounters a major change or realization that results from a shooting. This situation occurs during the times of extreme racial tension, Mathu stands firm his ground in a land full of whites. Charlie, om the other hand, is nothing like Mathu, in
Themes include social Darwinism, which metaphorically encourages individuals to fight to the finish in order to receive rewards. The ways in which the black community’s strongest and wildest members take advantage of their fellows, refusing to cooperate against the common white enemy just as Tatlock refuses to fake defeat; the corrupting influence of prizes and praise on the narrator himself; and the need for the white establishment to maintain symbolic as well as literal power over the black community. The Narrator wants to be a good member of his family and community but fails to understand the poisonous effect that southern race relations have on even such simple acts as delivering a harmless graduation speech. The story makes clear just
The novel is loaded with a plethora of imageries of a hostile white world. Wright shows how white racism affects the behavior, feelings, and thoughts of Bigger.
Paul Simon, the musician, once said, “If you can get humor and seriousness at the same time, you've created a special little thing, and that's what I'm looking for, because if you get pompous, you lose everything” (Simon 1). Racism in the 1930s and until the 1960s was a very serious issue. As stated, authors have taken this serious issue and turned it into great pieces of literature. Many of them have truly shown the seriousness of racism in society. Even though, criticism continues. Some critics have argued that Scout, in To Kill A Mockingbird, is an unreliable narrator. This is simply because Scout is a child. They suspect she is too innocent, naïve, and has an unbiased view. However, Scout as the narrator is a reliable choice because she allows the reader to concentrate more on the exterior of situations, she allows the reader to make his/her opinion, and she gives the reader direction of how to cover events and certain actions in the novel. Scout, as a child narrator, helps the reader ‘read between the lines’.
Although bigotry and segregation were pointed in majority towards blacks, other accounts towards whites were also heard of, though not as commonly. There are acts that are so discreet that you almost don't catch them, but along with those, there are blatant acts of bigotry that would never occur in our time. Lee addresses many of these feelings in her novel. One subtle example of discrimination the reader sees is the treatment of Calpurnia, a black woman, the housekeeper/nanny for the Finch family. Although she is treated fairly, it is obvious that she is considered to be on a lower social level than the Finches.
By using figures such as Louis Armstrong, Abraham Lincoln, and Harriet Tubman, the author deals to provide a relevance to the readers. Some characters within the novel are old enough to remember slavery and their presence lets Nathaniel be influenced by their experiences. The author introduced us Jericho who was half-white; yet, his own father treated him as a slave. The history of his family and other African Americans pushes the narrator to develop a perspective of being disliked because of his race. The incorporation of slavery in his ancestor by the author revives history and its effects on the narrator. The novel deals with the 1960’s as well as connecting to the past through Sweetie’s letter to the president. We are introduced to issues such as the War on Poverty and student revolts, along with African American concerns. In addition, Forrest’s indulgence of various historical events are purposed to evoke the moods of darkness and fear. The detailed episodes of the Great Flood, Middle Passage, and the migration of African-Americans, along with the vision of a black Mary under a tree more ancient than Eden, invokes the conscious acknowledgement of the suffering of the black race from centuries ago. The author injects such episodes into Nathaniel’s stream of consciousness to suggest the continuity