A Doll's House Essay

443 Words1 Page

Nora in A DOLL’s HOUSE by Henrik Ibsen made the correct decision at the end of the play by leaving her husband and children. Even though, both decision have potential negative impacts; Nora picked the better of the two choices because she is able to freely think and express herself and also reach a state of eudiamonia. First of all, Nora has no individuality in her “doll’s house”; by leaving she is finally liberated and has the chance to make her own decisions. Nora before leaving tells Torvald that “I have existed merely to perform tricks for you… You and papa have committed a great sin against me. It is your fault that I have made nothing of my life” (Ibsen 74). Finally, by leaving the house Nora can accomplish something by herself and find fulfillment in the work she does. She …show more content…

He called me his doll-child, he played with me just as I used to play with my dolls” (Ibsen 74). She then states that after marrying Helmer she “was simply transferred from papa’s hands into yours (Helmer). You arranged everything according to your own taste, and so I got the same tastes as your else I pretended to” (Ibsen 74). Therefore, Nora made the correct decision by leaving because she never had any input in the things surrounding her; she was just a doll who lived according to the decisions made by others. Finally, it’s often argued that Nora’s decision of leaving her husband and children is selfish. There is some truth to that statement, however, Nora believes that she has more important duties than the duties to her husband and children, and she explains that it is the “duties to myself… before all else I am a reasonable human being … I must think over things for myself and get to understand them” (Ibsen 76). Also, after Torvald reads about the letter from Krogstad, he states that “I shall not allow you (Nora) to bring up the children; I dare not trust them to you” (Ibsen

Open Document