A Doll's House Analytical Essay

846 Words2 Pages

In 1879 Norway, Henrik Ibsen published the play, A Doll House. A divisive play that created an awe reaction to it during its first play in the Royal Theatre Copenhagen N, Denmark. At its release, it crippled the European social norms, so society had to establish a new “patriarchal line” that supported and reinforced women’s independence. But according to Henrik Ibsen, he intended to portray the need for “self-exploration”. In the play, its minor character, Krogstad, tends to be the primary antagonist, controlling the conflicts presented in this play. He influences one of the major character, Nora, to question her social norms as a woman and to challenge her husband’s authority. After Krogstad got caught in a forgery scheme, he desires to regain his standing in the community once more by taking control of what he has …show more content…

For example, Krogstad cares deeply about his job, if necessary, he will “ fight as in my life to keep my little job in the bank”. Krogstad’s only goal is to retrieve his reputation and be an idol in his society. He confronts that what he did “…that time was no more and no worse. And it ruined my name and reputation.” In this quote, Krogstad reveals why he can’t afford to lose his job, because he forged and was caught. Also Krogstad threatens Nora for if “there’s no point in playing ignorant with me, mrs. Helmer. Very likely; but, to come to the point, the time has come when I should advise you to use your influence to prevent that.” Krogstad intends to keep his little job, therefore he binds Nora. Though One of the most poignant moments between the two is when they commiserate about their suicidal thoughts. He tells her, "Most of us think of that at first. I did, too – but I hadn't the courage." She replies quietly, "No more had I." In conclusion, Krogstad became an outcast to society’s view, but attempts to be a part of it by holding to his

Open Document