A Comparison of the Functionalist View with the Marxist View
Sociologists may disagree in their interpretation of how society
works. Some have focused on what keeps society together; others have
focused on what divides society. Over the years the two major
paradigms have dominated sociology these are functionalism and the
conflict theory better know as Marxism. Both the Marxism view and the
functionalist view have their own totally different point of view.
Haralambos points out that ‘although functionalists emphasize the
importance of value in society they do recognize that conflict can
occur”. However functionalists consider such conflict as being the
result of temporary disturbances in the social system. Indeed, these
temporary disturbances are usually quickly corrected as society
evolves. What is deemed to be the most important interest for the
functionalists is that, which is shared by all social groups: What we
refer to as the ‘common interest’ which according to the
functionalists, caters for the smooth running of society. However, by
referring to common interest we are implying that their may be other
interests. In fact each and every group has its own particular
interests. In direct contrast to functionalists, conflict theories
advocate the belief that there are certain fundamental differences
amongst social groups. However such differences are not of temporary
nature (as functionalists believe) but are a common and persistent
feature of society.
Functionalism adopts an organical analogy in order to explain how
every society functions in order to attain and sustain its
functionality. Functionalist agree that just as an...
... middle of paper ...
... institution of capitalist society is private property, the system by
which capital (that is, money, machines, tools, factories, and other
material objects used in production) is controlled by a small minority
of the population. This arrangement leads to two opposed classes, the
owners of capital (called the bourgeoisie) and the workers (called the
proletariat), whose only property is their own labor time, which they
have to sell to the capitalists.
As we can see the two theories dispute about two totally different
factors in society. Functionalists in my opinion put too much emphasis
on value consensus. This may create instability due to competition.
Where as Marxists give us a very realistic view of the society we live
in, and not perceives society and the individuals as always to be in
harmony with one another.
Functionalism, explained by Emile Durkheim, states that each part of society is required for society to function as a whole. When the crops failed to grow, a
Despite the fact that many critics focus on the economic side of TPP, two sociological theories can be applied to analyze how the approval of TPP would lead to social problems. First of all, TPP will be enforced by the governments of the signatory nations, and will yield enormous changes to the economy of the countries. Thus, Structural Functionalism can be used to study the nature of the problem by focusing on those two major social institutions. Also, as trade and alliance usually involve frictions between nations due to the difference in the core values, social systems, and cultures. Therefore, these conflicts can be studied with non-Marxist Conflict Theory.
This economic study will define the dilution and variability of Marxist and Neo-Marxist Theory in the post-WWII era. The slow dilution of Marxist theory as a 19th century economic concept defines the rise of capitalism and the neoliberal ideology that has permeated the latter half of the 20th century. The fall of communism in the late 1980s reveals the bankruptcy of communism as a state ideology in the U.S.S.R., especially after the Unite States and other first world nations triumphed through the neoliberal capitalist ideology of the 1990s and into the 21st century. More so, the dilution of Marxism also occurs in the increasing cultural and social abstractions of Marxist ideology that stray from the objective “materialism” of traditional Marxist analysis, which shows a moderate rationalization for capitalism in the Neo-Marxist theory of social and cultural factors in 20th century economics. Various institutions and Neo-Marxists theorists, such as Max Weber and Antonio Gramsci, tend to moderate the effect
Structural-functionalist Kingsley Davis and Wilbert Moore concluded that stratification of society is inevitable because: for society to function its positions must be filled, some positions are more important than others, the more important positions must be filled by the more qualified people, and to motivate the more qualified people to fill these positions they must offer greater rewards. (2012:228) Example of Davis and Moore conclusion is if someone apply for a job as a teacher, they need to be highly qualify in area such as education and experience. For that person to be interest in the job, employer need to offer benefit like retirement plan, vacation time, health insurance, etc… Unlike the position as a teacher, if someone is applying
Sociology is founded on three basic perspectives which include the functionalist perspective, conflict perspective, and interactionist perspective. The functionalist perspective was founded by Emile Durkheim, a French philosopher and sociologist, in the early 1920s. It views society as a system in which institutions, all different, but related, serve a particular purpose. The overall goal of these institutions is to maintain functional order within our society. For example, state governments provide education to children, which children’s families in turn pay taxes for and the state depends on those funds to keep itself going. These children then grow up and become law-abiding citizens who pay taxes and continue the same cycle. A way to better
The first major functionalist thinker was Emile Durkheim (1858-1917), although subsequently there have been numerous other significant contributors in the establishment of functionalist rationale, the most notable being Talcott Parsons (1902-1979). Functionalism theorises that society is made up of various social institutions, a social institution is a group of people organised for a specific purpose or purposes. The family is viewed as the cornerstone of society...
Functionalism is a theory of contemporary philosophy of the mind, designed to provide a solution to behaviourism and identity theory, but more importantly a solution to the mind/body problem. In this essay I will discuss the theory of functionalism, and what solution it offers in resolving the mind/body problem. The mind/body problem examines the relationship between the mind and physical matter, more specifically the relationship between consciousness and the brain that other theories of the mind have failed to account for. Solutions to the mind body problem attempt to explain one’s subjective experience of an objective physical world.
Structural functionalism and conflict theory are two types of macro-theories. Structural functionalism (Perrucci, 1983) has three main ideas: 1) society is a system containing interdependent and interacting parts bound together in time and space, 2) shared values among members of the system are social “glue” that helps hold it together, 3) and systems have a need for stability and therefor attempt the parts working together harmoniously. Conflict theory is the belief that society contains basic inequalities in wealth, power, and prestige (Coser, 1967; Dahrendorf, 1959).
Sructural functionalism has several major features and criticisms. The major features are social processes, the AGIL scheme, norms and values and the voluntaristic theory. Talcott Parsons received quite a lot of criticism over his ideas. The criticisms I will discuss are conflict theory, feminist criticism, Marxist criticism, rational actor approaches and neo-functionalism. Structural functionalism sees society as a complex system with parts that work together to promote solidarity and stability.
What are conflict and functionalist perspectives? The conflict perspective is “the sociological approach that views groups in society as engaged in a continuous power struggle for control of scarce resources” (Kendall, 25). These conflicts can result in forms such as politics and negotiations. Most conflicts form with discussion of family financial situations, due to the lack of resources (Kendall, 25). The functionalist perspective is defined as, “perspectives are based on the assumption that society is a stable, orderly system (Kendall, 23). Which perspective is more important for the well being of humans? In the global world today, the majority of individuals are involved in the functionalist perspective, which can lead to continuous
Functionalists take the position that the patterns of behavior that characterize a society exist because they are functional for that society. Social inequality is universal, so inequality must help societies survive. (Henslin, 2016, p.204) Conflict theory provides a third perspective on social life. Functionalists view society as a harmonious whole with its parts working together, where conflict theorists stress that society is composed of groups that compete with one another for scarce resources. (Henslin, 2016, p.18) Social stratification refers to the division of large numbers of people into layers according to their relative property, power, and prestige. It does not refer to individuals; it is a way of ranking large groups of people into
In the history of anthropology and sociology, there have been many different social theories. Often these theories are influential for a period of time and then lose popularity once a new, more seductive theory is established. Marxism and functionalism are two examples of social theories that made a grand impact on the anthropological and sociological fields, but have since faded from the forefront. Marxism was established by Karl Marx in the mid-1800s and was later adopted by other theorists, such as Marvin Harris. Marxism was built upon the idea that there has been an ongoing class struggle in human history and it is this conflict between classes that will lead to social change and eventually to the birth of Communism. Functionalism was introduced during the mid-1900s and was adopted by Émile Durkheim, E.E. Evans-Pritchard, Bronislaw Malinowski, Alfred Radcliffe-Brown, and many other ethnographers. The basic notion of functionalism is that society consists of many different, but interrelated parts, each of which have a specific function and work together to maintain a society. The ethnographer often saw it as their job to uncover the social order and structure present within the society (Baert 1998). Although Marxism and functionalism were developed in close temporal proximity and similarities can be established between the two theories, at their core they are fundamentally in opposition to each other.
Theories have been composed and exposed by various philosophers to clarify their reasoning about the mind. Dualism, Behaviorism, and Identity Theory, are well-known theories supported by well-written explanations. A modern theory, Functionalism provides ample insight to the main problem philosophers deal with, the mind/body problem.
Functionalism sees society as a complex system whose parts interconnect. This perspective came from the works of Emile Durkheim, who was concerned with how society remains relatively stable. Emilie recognised that society exists beyond us—it has a life of its own. (Macionis & Plummer p.124) He recognised that society has the power to shape our thoughts and actions. Functionalism sees that studying society as a whole can only capture human experience. Durkheim saw crime as a ‘vital function for the ongoing life of society itself.’ (Macionis & Plummer p.125) He believed that crime is quite normal, and society would not exist without it. Functionalism sees society as a integrated whole where the parts work to hold it all together and sometimes it does not function well and falls apart. (Macionis & Plummer p.37) Durkheim did not precisely define the factors and dynamics accounting for the unity of society. He focused m...
Ø In particular with Durkheim’s work, it is too optimistic and maintains the idea of social solidarity as the main theme, and simply believes pathologies can be solved through simple social reform, ignoring any problems or conflict and the affects. Ø Marxists argue that the modern family is organised to support and benefit the ruling class and the capitalist economy, rather than benefiting all of society. In particular, they accuse functionalists for ignoring the fact that power is not equally distributed in society. Some groups have more wealth and power than others and may be able to impose their norms and values as less powerful groups.