Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
On his blindness by John milton
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: On his blindness by John milton
On His Blindness is a sonnet written by John Milton who was an English poet and historian. His work is said to resemble Shakespeare’s work. The Mistress is a West Indian poem, written by Jane King. Her poems deal with the race consciousness of the people of the Caribbean and the many concerns of the Caribbean societies. In the poems, On His Blindness and The Mistress, each poet try to capture their whole meaning of life, their guilt, their hopes and plans for the future and to show that things are only temporary in life. In these two poems, the point-of-view, imagery, form and meter reveal the relationship between the two, discussing their similarities and differences. Both poems are told from a first person point-of-view. In John Milton’s poem, the speaker is speaking about how he lives in a world with no light, only darkness and that all his light has been used up. In Jane King’s poem, the speaker is talking about a life she is living as a wife after her husband has left or passed away. She is staying in a temporary home and tries to keep it nice and going. This temporariness is seen in Milton’s poem, where the speaker is talking about his vision. That his sight was not permanent, it was only temporary and he eventually lost it. In the third stanza of The Mistress she says, “I have used an alien domesticity”. It shows that she is living in a strange home, a strange family life and that being a Mohammed 2 housewife is “dutiful” and “dull”. On His Blindness is also saying that people are dutiful to God; they are obedient and controlled by God. He has many people doing his “bidding”. John Milton takes on a religious path in the poem, linking to the Bible in line 3, “talent which is death to hide”. Talent is a standard of weight... ... middle of paper ... ...tanding. Patience is able to cut him short before he asks the question and explains that God does not need man or anything to be happy. The meter of the poem is in iambic pentameter. The Mistress, the physical structure is made up of four stanzas where as the other poem does not. The rhyming scheme is not very fixed or regular, ABCDA. Only the first and last lines of each stanza rhymes. This type of free-verse poem is the run-on lines or enjambment. Both Milton and King’s poems create a vision of their world and their life. They both show their struggles of everyday life between being blind and being a housewife. The Mistress hoped for a better life. On His Blindess, the speaker is confused and has a feeling of guilt. He felt Mohammed 4 that he failed to use his sight or “light” when he had it and that he wanted to do so many things when it was available to him.
The poem is written in the style of free verse. The poet chooses not to separate the poem into stanzas, but only by punctuation. There is no rhyme scheme or individual rhyme present in the poem. The poems structure creates a personal feel for the reader. The reader can personally experience what the narrator is feeling while she experiences stereotyping.
The. Maybe it is a genuine love poem to his mistress, sort of. offer of a way of life. Both concepts, though, underline the point. simplistic romanticism of the poem.
The lady seems to be poor “suffering along in her broke shows” tells us that she has nothing and is worthless. Emotive language has been used to visually describe how she looks. “with a sack of bones on her back and a song in her brain” this expresses that she in a free, happy minded lady and doesn’t really take note of what she doesn’t have. " to feed the outlaws prowling about the Domain” This tell us that she most likely does this act of kindness very often, not having much at all and simple giving the outlaws something to feed on. “proudly they step up to meet her” Giving this visual effect makes us understand the power this lady has for these feral cats and to also see how much this lady means to this cats. “with love and power” - juxtaposition, again shows us the emotive language between the two this also means that she has a sense of power which she doesn’t have with the outer world. This perception of the lady is very different as to what how we see her. She is to be seen as a person who you wouldn’t want so associate with. Throughout the poem she has been moved from a princess to a queen with the development of metaphors. But to the cats she is the queen and this really depicts the distinctively visual. Douglas Stewart is seeing her as this queen who is celebrated and appreciated by the cats but this is not how she feels with society. With this connection between the cats, it gives us a deeper understanding of how to perceptions of each individual sees the world. Every individual has their own sense of views of the
“Cathedral” a short story by Raymond Carver shows how a visit from a blind man affects the lives of a married couple. The three main characters are the husband who is the narrator, the wife, and Robert. The husband is a close minded and cynical man who is upset because Robert is staying in his house because he does not know how to treat a blind man. The wife is a kind woman who has a closer relationship with Roberts than with her husband. Robert is a blind man who just lost her wife and is staying with his friend and her husband. In “Cathedral,” Raymond Carver uses symbolism to show the weakness and strengths of humans.
The husband in Raymond Carvers “Cathedral” wasn’t enthusiastic about his wife’s old friend, whom was a blind man coming over to spend the night with them. His wife had kept in touch with the blind man since she worked for him in Seattle years ago. He didn’t know the blind man; he only heard tapes and stories about him. The man being blind bothered him, “My idea of blindness came from the movies. In the movies, the blind moved slowly and never laughed. Sometimes they were led by seeing-eye dogs. A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward to. (Carver 137)” The husband doesn’t suspect his ideas of blind people to be anything else. The husband is already judging what the blind man will be like without even getting to actually know him. It seems he has judged too soon as his ideas of the blind man change and he gets a better understanding of not only the blind man, but his self as well.
This story, written as the thoughts of the narrator, is about an old blind friend of his wife’s coming to visit for the first time. The story focuses on the narrator’s cynicism toward the blind man and the way his wife seems to look up to him. Through out the visit there is halting interaction between the blind man and the narrator, however in the end the narrator experiences something he never could have imagined. Through the eyes of a blind man, he gains a better understanding of who he could be.
The narrator is extremely judgmental towards the blind and this creates negative preconceived notions about Robert. First, his idea of a blind man comes from movies he has watched and describes that the blind, “moved slowly and never laughed” (Par. 1). The narrator has a horrible attitude towards the blind and because of this he sees himself higher than any blind person. Second, he believes that when Robert’s wife was alive they both had no capability of loving each other solely because of Robert’s blindness. He thinks Robert cannot love because he had never “seen what the goddamned woman looked like” (Par. 16). The narrator then thinks Robert’s wife could not love him because she could “never see herself as she was seen in the eyes of her loved one” (Par. 16). This kind of harsh thinking that the narrator has towards Robert is detrimental to himself as well as those surrounding him. The narrator is trapped with judgmental thinking, making him hard to be around and cooperate with.
Before Robert even arrives at the house, it is easy to tell that the husband is an incredibly prejudice man. When he hears that his wife has invited a blind guy over to his house, he is not happy in the least. He instead begins to think about the bizarre stereotypes which he believes come with being blind and reveals his ignorance through statements like, “In the movies, the blind moved slowly and never laughed. Sometimes they were led by seeing-eye dogs. A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward to.” He already begins to judge the man without ever having met him, and when Robert walks in the door, he becomes surprised that he doesn’t fit his stereotypical ideas. “He didn't use a cane and he didn't wear dark glasses. I'd always thought dark glasses were a must for the blind.” He continues to watch him, however, critically studying his appearance and mannerisms. It almost seems as if he believes the blind man does not have the right to certain things merely because he cannot physically see the world as he can. As the night wears on, however, Robert continues to put certain of the husband’s ideas to rest. During dinner the narrator watches with admiration as the he uses the knife and fork on his meat. "He'd ...
In Raymond Carver's "Cathedral," the husband's view of blind men is changed when he encounters his wife's long time friend, Robert. His narrow minded views and prejudice thoughts of one stereotype are altered by a single experience he has with Robert. The husband is changed when he thinks he personally sees the blind man's world. Somehow, the blind man breaks through all of the husband's jealousy, incompetence for discernment, and prejudgments in a single moment of understanding.
In the story "Cathedral" by Raymond Carver, it tells of how a blind man is open to new experiences and how he views the world compared to the husband (narrator) who is blinded by the material things of life. The husband is given the gift of sight but the true gift comes from seeing the cathedral. At the beginning of the story, the husband’s outlook on others is filled with stereotypes, discrimination, insecurities and prejudice. After interacting with Robert, his wife's friend, his outlook begins to change significantly.
“To the Virgins, to Make Much of Time” by Rober Herrick and Andrew Marvell’s “To His Coy Mistress” have many similarities and differences. The tone of the speakers, the audience each poem is directed to, and the theme make up some of the literary elements that help fit this description.
Throughout his life... was a man self-haunted, unable to escape from his own drama, unable to find any window that would not give him back the image of himself. Even the mistress of his most passionate love-verses, who must (one supposes) have been a real person, remains for him a mere abstraction of sex: a thing given. He does not see her --does not apparently want to see her; for it is not of her that he writes, but of his relation to her; not of love, but of himself loving.
At the start, the first stanza of the poem is full of flattery. This is the appeal to pathos. The speaker is using the mistress's emotions and vanity to gain her attention. By complimenting her on her beauty and the kind of love she deserves, he's getting her attention. In this first stanza, the speaker claims to agree with the mistress - he says he knows waiting for love provides the best relationships. It feels quasi-Rogerian, as the man is giving credit to the woman's claim, he's trying to see her point of view, he's seemingly compliant. He appears to know what she wants and how she should be loved. This is the appeal to ethos. The speaker seems to understand how relationships work, how much time they can take, and the effort that should be put forth. The woman, if only reading stanza one, would think her and the speaker are in total agreement.
This poem speaks of a love that is truer than denoting a woman's physical perfection or her "angelic voice." As those traits are all ones that will fade with time, Shakespeare exclaims his true love by revealing her personality traits that caused his love. Shakespeare suggests that the eyes of the woman he loves are not twinkling like the sun: "My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun" (1). Her hair is compared to a wire: "If hairs be wires, black wires grow on her head" (3). These negative comparisons may sound almost unloving, however, Shakespeare proves that the mistress outdistances any goddess. This shows that the poet appreciates her human beauties unlike a Petrarchan sonnet that stresses a woman's cheek as red a rose or her face white as snow. Straying away from the dazzling rhetoric, this Shakespearean poem projects a humane and friendly impression and elicits laughter while expressing a truer love. A Petrarchan sonnet states that love must never change; this poem offers a more genuine expression of love by describing a natural woman.
understand the points that Milton was trying to get across. An intricate poem can often be