Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effect of nurturing nature
Relationship of nature and nurture
Nurture of nature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effect of nurturing nature
The first study in “40 Studies That Changed Psychology” is about the left hemisphere and the right hemisphere of the brain. The left side of the brain and the right side of the brain are separate. The left side of the brain deals with speech, writing, and logical thinking while the right side of the brain understand emotions, space, and abstract concepts. Both parts of the brain can work efficiently when separated but work more efficiently when they can communicate with each other. Studies were done with cats, split-brain patients, and regular patients to determine the functions of each hemisphere and how the two hemispheres communicate. There were visual tests involving lights and pictures, tactile tests involving the touching …show more content…
Because the left side of the brain controls speech, the right side of the brain cannot vocally express their understandings, even though they do actually understand. Also, split-brain patients function basically normally, with the exception of a few disabilities, and can even possibly take in more information than regular people. These finding makes people wonder if it would be beneficial for everyone to have the hemispheres of their brain’s separated. This concept and these tests are extremely interesting to me. Though I don’t like the idea of experimenting with cats—or any animals for that matter—I like how complex the brain is, how two hemispheres control different things, and that split-brain patients could have higher IQ levels. It’s extremely interesting that even though the right hemisphere of the brain understands what it is seeing, it cannot communicate with the mouth. The second study is about whether or not different environments effect brain …show more content…
It is common sense to assume that socialization, happiness, and more food and water is better for the brain than isolation and just enough sustenance to stay alive. The third study was about one of phycology’s biggest debates; nature vs. nurture. Nature vs. nurture has been one of psychology’s biggest debates for decades, maybe centuries. Many studies have shown that nature rules seventy percent of our behavior but people hate that idea, especially parents. The biggest study that was done was by two men named Bouchard and Lykken, to see what the strongest influence of personality is, genetics or environment. They found thousands of twins with identical genetics, especially those who were separated at birth. They gave each twin over fifty surveys on anything about themselves and their upbringings that one could think of. The results showed that twins have similar personalities, even if they didn’t grow up together, even if they lived in completely different households, and not all twins who grew up together were completely identical in
The author explains that in many businesses, abilities associated with the left side of the brain used to matter the most. These include lin...
hemispheres of the brain in which he stated that " . . . left - hemisphere style
Michael S. Gazzaniga was born in December 12, 1939 in Los Angeles, California. He got his B.A at Dartmouth College in 1961. As well as, he received his PHD. in Psycho-biology at California Institute of Technology. He worked under the guidance of Roger Sperry. Also, he conducts a research on a brain, which it makes people understand how does the brain work. In spite of, that he was under the guidance, he had a primary responsibility for the Split-brain research. It allows him to make some remarkable advances by examining patients and non-patients brain. Also, by using different methods to prove his point. For example, to clarify the hemisphere functions in the two brains that each have, he used right-handed and left-handed people. So, we can
The corpus callosum binds the left and right hemispheres of the brain together, both physically and communicatively. After this operation has been performed, there was a remarkable development with how we perceive things and some of the results showed how much we rely on the connection between the two halves of our brain. There are also advantages of having a split brain. A study performed by Rogers et al, 2004 found that when you have two halves of a brain then it increases your ability to both look for food and watch for predators at the same time. Possibly demonstrating that the connections between our ancestors’ brain hemispheres were less developed. Another advantage is having the ability to read two pages at once. Of course, there are more disadvantages than advantages of having a split brain. An example of one is the most famous split brain study of all time, Sperry, 1968. In this study each participant, all having two halves of a brain, was shown two different images. One in each visual field and when asked to draw the image they had just seen they would draw the image they saw on the left but they would describe it as the image they saw on the right. This shows that the left side of the brain, which controls the right visual field, contains the information to be able to describe an object when seen
The brain has four major lobes. The frontal lobe, the parietal lobe, the occipital lobe, and temporal lobe are responsible for all of the activities of the body, from seeing, hearing, tasting, to touching, moving, and even memory. After many years of debating, scientist presents what they called the localization issue, Garret explains how Fritsch and Hitzig studied dog with conforming observations, but the cases of Phineas Gage’s accident in 1848 and Paul Broca’s autopsy of a man brain in 1861 really grabbed the attention of an enthusiastic scientific community (Garret 2015 p.6)
The corpus callosum binds the left and right hemispheres of the brain together, both physically and communicatively. After this operation has been performed, there was a remarkable development with how we perceive things and some of the results showed how much we rely on the connection between the two halves of our brain. There are also advantages of having a split brain. A study performed by Rogers et al, 2004 found that when you have two halves of a brain then it increases your ability to both look for food and watch for predators at the same time. Possibly demonstrating that the connections between our ancestors’ brain hemispheres were less developed. Another advantage is having the ability to read two pages at once. Of course, there are more disadvantages than advantages of having a split brain. An example of one is the most famous split brain study of all time, Sperry, 1968. In this study each participant, all having two halves of a brain, was shown two different images. One in each visual field and when asked to draw the image they had just seen they would draw the image they saw on the left but they would describe it as the image they saw on the right. This shows that the left side of the brain, which controls the right visual field, contains the information to be able to describe an object when seen
Roger Sperry is one of the big Neurobiologists in the 1950’s. Sperry studied the relationship of the right and left hemispheres of the brain. In one of his experiments he flashed the word “Fork” in front of the patient. If the patient was asked to say the word he could not but if asked to right the word he would start to right the word “Fork”. This happed when the two brain hemispheres were disconnected from each other. At an another experiment he placed a toothbrush in the patients left hand and blind folded the patient and was asked to identify it they could not do it. But if placed in the right hand the patient would know right away what it was. That is just one of the types of study he did in his time.
“The term “nature versus nurture” is used to refer to a long-running scientific debate. The source of debate is the question of which has a greater influence on development: someone's innate characteristics provided by genetics, or someone's environment. In fact, the nature versus nurture debate has been largely termed obsolete by many researchers, because both innate characteristics and environment play a huge role in development, and they often intersect”. (Smith, 2010 p. 1)
and behavior of the child. In fact, the more we understand about development and behavior, the better. the more obvious it becomes that nature and nurture are similarly influences. rather than determinants, not only singly but also in combination. Here below, I will endeavour to expose the leading theories dealing with the question of nature.
Nurture is constituted by the influence of millions of complex environmental factors that form a child's character. Advocators of nature do not believe that character is predetermined by genes, but formed over time. Although often separated, nature and nurture work together in human development. The human conscience is neither innate from birth or entirely shaped through experience, instead, genetics and environmental influences combine to form human behavior, character, and personality traits that constantly change and develop throughout life. The debate on nature versus nurture has existed for thousands of years.
Nowadays, it is widely known that the right and left hemisphere have different functions. The two hemispheres are equally important in a daily life basis. Nevertheless, in the 1960’s this was not common knowledge. Even though today the importance of the brain hemispheres is common knowledge, people don’t usually know to whom attribute this findings. One of the people who contributed to form a more defined picture about the brain hemispheres and their respective functions was Roger Wolcott Sperry, with the split brain research. Roger Sperry did more contributions than the split brain research, but this is his most important and revolutionary research in the psychological field. Thanks to the split brain research, Sperry proved that the two hemispheres of the brain are important, they work together and whatever side of the brain is more capable of doing the task is the hemisphere that takes the lead.
In the video "Powerful Stoke of Insight," Dr. Taylor share a personal story of how she experienced when she had a stoke years ago. She vividly illustrated the distinct functions of left hemisphere and right hemisphere. Since her stoke occurred in the left hemisphere, she had a hard time to process language during the tragic event happened. She was paralysis and could not understand any of the word from 911 telephone operator when she finally reached the phone. According to Dr. Taylor, "Our right human hemisphere is all about this present moment, [and] our left hemisphere thinks linearly and methodically." Due to the reason that her stoke damaged her left hemisphere, she could not think logically at the moment. This presentation thoroughly explain the concept of lateralization in biological psychology research method. I find it very interesting because I never learn that each hemisphere do in charge of different functions that affecting our
A study in 1986 in Minnesota found that genetics play a larger role on personality then it was to be previously thought to be.
One of the hottest debates is and has been nature vs nurture for years, but what is the difference between the two? Nature is what people think of as already having and not being able to change it, in other words, pre-wiring (Sincero). Nurture is the influence of experiences and its environment of external factors (Sincero). Both nature and nurture play important roles in human development. Scientists and researchers are both trying to figure out which is the main cause in development because it is still unknown on which it is. The best position to side with is nature. Nature is also defined as genetic or hormone based behaviors (Agin). Regardless of the involvement in everyday life, or nurture, this argumentation centers around the effect genes have on human personalities. Although it is understandable on reasons to side with nurture, nature is the better stand in this controversy. Reasons to side with nature is because of genes and what genes hold. Genes is what
...re of the brain is just half of the brain so why is it the only half being explored in school? This failure to confront the other hemisphere causes weakening in the right hemisphere since the right hemisphere isn?t being exercised.