37.2 Trillion: Galaxies Or Human Cells Summary

778 Words2 Pages

The article for this research is “37.2 Trillion: Galaxies or Human Cells?” by Nicholas Balakar and it appeared in the New York Times. In this article, Balakar poses a question regarding which has a higher number: all of the known galaxies in the observed universe and the number of cells in the average human body. In attempting to determine the answer, he immediately states that both totals would be massive in number and that it would be impossible to reach a precise answer. There are also several unknown factors involved in this question, including the fact that the human body can vary in size a great deal and the fact that the size of the known universe is constantly changing with our ability to observe it. While individual galaxies have been identified at length, our definition of what a galaxy is has evolved over time and may continue to do so. Galaxy derived from Greek galaxias. Galaxies are defined by the National Geographic as:” sprawling space systems composed of dust gas and countless stars.” At the same time, nobody …show more content…

Dr. Bianconi and her team of research scientists utilized this data and rough estimates of the average size of a human cell to determine that there would likely be roughly 37.2 trillion cells in the average human body. Scientists mapped out the average surface area of a human and made calculations based on this finding. For Balakar, this means that there are certainly more cells in the human body than there could be galaxies. In determining the likely number of galaxies, astronomers have simply counted the number of galaxies in an individual section of the universe and multiplied that by the vast volume of space that exists in the known universe. By using this technique, scientists have estimated that there are 800 billion

More about 37.2 Trillion: Galaxies Or Human Cells Summary

Open Document