6. Conclusions The findings from the experiments of current and past researchers bear considerable similarity to the findings of my own experiment conducted as primary research. While each experiment examined dealt with slightly different variables, each one was able to further support the hypothesis that one’s positive physical characteristics, such as nice dress, appearance, and a positive expression, will cause others to perceive one to have more positive traits such as trustworthiness and goodness. This is demonstrated first off in the Clark Doll Test, whose results showed that society can impress upon anyone goodness and badness related to a physical characteristic, such as race. Next, the 1984 voter manipulation experiment demonstrated …show more content…
For instance, both of these people are dressed nicely, concurring with Halili’s study. Person F, being female, is wearing makeup and was coincidentally often viewed as having a significant, successful role in society, such as being a human rights advocate in the United Nations, which reflects the result of the makeup and career advancement experiment. The setting of Person A’s photograph was a courthouse, which could have caused subjects to make inferences based on that, similar to the trustworthiness experiment by Nicholas Rule. Examining all of the six pictures, those who were smiling - Persons A, D, and F - were often viewed as trustworthy, good individuals, like the results of the 1984 United States election experiment suggested could be a factor. Moreover, the Gender/Ethnicity Bike Theft experiment’s results were supported through the fact that the women were less commonly associated with being criminals than the males were, as the female actress was compared to the male actors in the Bike Theft experiment, and also how the man of colour, Person B, who looked to be of Hispanic ethnicity, was often associated with being a criminal, similar to how the African-American boy in the Bike Theft experiment was seen as more of a criminal
As put by Holy Golightly in Breakfast at Tiffany 's, "Anyone who ever gave you confidence, you owe them a lot."(Capote). When a positive stereotype is introduced and one lives up to it or works toward it the results can be progressive. Generally positive stereotypes increase and improve performance in individuals when introduced. An interesting experiment showed that when tested, "Each group performed better on the task they believe the opposite gender underperformed on"(Krendl, Gainsburg, Nalini). When the group believed they would do better, they did indeed. Positive stereotypes encourage people to do better and to be better. In this case, stereotypes give confidence instead of taking it away showing that sometimes stereotypes can be
How the Vote Was Won introduces the role of brave women in their journey to success of the national suffrage movement. Mead writes about the success that was brought by the women in the western states, and gives the readers an insight on the struggles of racism and elitism that played throughout the suffrage movement in the western states. In eight perceptive chapters, the authors focuses on a few states in the west, in which she explains the successes or failures of the campaigns for woman suffrage. Mead also addresses readers with significant descriptions of how the woman 's suffrage served as both economic and political justice giving women the right to vote.
There is a famous saying that states, “ we should not judge a book by its cover”, but oftentimes the first thing noticed on a person is their looks. One’s “physical beauty” strongly influences people’s first impressions of them. As a whole, we tend to assume that pretty people are more likeable and better people than those who are unattractive. Around the world, we believe that what is beautiful is good. There is a general consensus within a culture about what is considered physically appealing and beautiful. “Physical beauty” is associated with being more sociable, intelligent, and even socially skilled. Society shares this common notion of who has and who does not have “physical beauty”. Thus, “physical beauty”, as seen
As said earlier, in one study researchers used different conditions to assess the differences in people’s behavior. The two conditions were the prejudice condition and the no prejudice condition. The prejudice condition involved one’s religion being mentioned. The participants were in a casual setting and thought that all the other men in the room were Gentiles and knew they were Jewish. After interacting and the experiment concluded, the men were asked to fill out a mood adjective check list, and rated themselves on positive and negative Jewish stereotypes and self- esteem traits. On the other hand, in the no prejudice condition religion and ethnicity were not mentioned which left the men with attribution to prejudice (Dion & Earn,
According to recent research, there have been people who have found that this effect can be present in the media. Reporters and journalist are more likely to report the news of attractive people rather than no eyed-catching people. The article “Better-Looking Politicians Get More Media Coverage” published by ScienceDaily explains and presents the results of these studies, which have been performed by the University of Haifa’s Department of Communication. The results of these researchers have shown that better-looking, political tenure, seniority and army rank get higher frequency of TV news coverage. With this statement, we can infer that not only the appearance counts, but also what kind of people merit respect for inhabitants inside the society.
The human race is comprised of a plethora of shapes, sizes, colors, and figures. Some of these images are regarded as ‘distorted’ in dominant culture, but these distortions are what makes every person unique and should be celebrated. Stereotypes, whether positive or negative, take these ‘distortions’ and assign behavioral attributes to them. This assumes that all persons who meet a certain set of physical requirements behave in a similar way. Due to the diversity of the human race, this outcome is highly improbable. Despite this, stereotypes are often used to describe a group of people, usually amplifying a negative trait that may not b...
Typically, 2 people will form an opinion of others within the first 3 seconds of meeting one another. The way these opinions are formed so quickly is, generally speaking, solely because of physical appearance. All too often, in our society today, people are criticized for what material possessions they have and how much money said people have to spend on things that they do not need, but instead just want. It does not matter where you go; this can be observed almost anywhere. Sometimes, when people notice that someone has cheaper clothes or less objects of purely material value, the people who have more frown upon those who have less. Ev...
Izumi, Yutaka and Frank Hammonds. "Changing Ethnic/Racial Stereotypes: The Roles of Individuals and Groups." Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal (2007): 845-852.
That is, inferences about individual traits could be drawn form situational facial expressions, on the basis of what those facial expressions mean within the domain of gendered stereotypes. To test this plausible theory, Hack recruited 138 undergraduate students. Each pupil was to complete a questionnaire assessing gender stereotype endorsement, subsequent to an impression task: where smiling and non-smiling faces were rated in terms of personality traits relative to warmth and competence. Credibly, traits selected to assess warmth and competence had been plucked from a successful pilot study and strategies to counteract demand characteristics were
Tice, D.M, Butler J.L., Muraven M.B. & Stillwell A.M. (1995). When modesty prevails: Differential favorability of self-presentation to friends and strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(6), 1120-1138 doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1120
That example that was given to us was in a mall setting a local comedian Jay Peter was dressed in a suit and tie along with a camera man shooting footage to make the skit look more realistic. He and the camera man walked around approaching random people at the mall giving them nonrealistic facts, they seemed to believe what he was saying just by the way he was dressed. Another study showed that 70% of the time we can pick a candidate based on their looks, facial structure has a big contribution to our
The experiment to test the social norm of what clothes to wear in the gym consisted of five participants. The three confederates, Julie Curtis, Melissa Medici, and Payge Yerkes, were in the control group and wore gym shorts, t-shirts, and sneakers. The job of the control group was to watch the other gym patrons’ reactions to the experimenter’s attire. The experimental group consisted of Julie Crance, who wore a black top, black pants and brown heels; and Danielle Bonser, who wore a black dress and black wedges. Both experimenters wore their hair down, curled and wore a lot of makeup. Crance rode the bike, while Bonser worked on the elliptical for the duration of this experiment, which took place in the Kaplan gym at Mount Saint Mary College.
In a growing world, relying on education and intelligence, judgments in a social environment are still continuously based off of appearance. A study of the importance of outer looks was produced through a TV game show. Contestants fought to answer questions correctly to improve their personal score. At the end of the game, the player with the highest score was asked to eliminate a team member. Although many times an unattractive player would have higher scores and could be more beneficial than another teammate, only 27% of unattractive members were chosen to advance to the next round (Belot, Bhaskar, and van de Ven 852-853). When society overlooks qualities and characteristics of high value for looks, discrimination conquers.
The experiment given by Aronson and Cope tested the attractiveness and punishments given by a person based on their relationship with another person. Forty male and forty female were randomly assigned to get a harsh experimenter and pleasant experimenter, harsh experimenter and harsh supervisor, pleasant experimenter and pleasant supervisor, or pleasant experimenter and harsh supervisor. The people who participated in the experiment thought they were participating in a study on creativity. The college students had to write a creative story on each picture that they were shown. The graduate student, who was the experimenter, always had a negative reaction to their stories but was either considerate about letting them know or was really harsh and rude about informing the students about their not creative stories. Then the experimenter would put his foot on the on the vent in the room and that would signal the supervisor to come interrupt the session to let the experimenter know if they had done a good job or bad job on the research that he had been conducting. This research is ba...
Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.