1984 Argument

592 Words2 Pages

The novel 1984 by George Orwell can be viewed as prophetic or, at the very least, a logical extension of some governments’ control in Orwell’s time. The story is about a middle class man, Winston Smith is a low-ranking member of a ruling Party in London, Oceania. Everywhere, even in individual homes, the Party watches its people through telescreens; a television with a camera inside. Everywhere he looks he sees the face of Big Brother, the Party’s omniscient leader. The Party controls everything in Oceania, even the history and language. The Party is introducing the implementation of an invented language called Newspeak, which prevents rebellion by eliminating all words related to it. Even thinking unorthodox thoughts is a treachery to the government. Such “thoughtcrime” is the worst of all transgressions (sparknote.com). One of the main subjects is the Party’s ability to rewrite history to glorify itself. Somebody opposed to my statement might say that nobody can truly rewrite history, and if they did someone would rat them out. However when we look at one example in the book, whic...

More about 1984 Argument

Open Document