1940's Film Analysis

696 Words2 Pages

Films have always reflected the society we live in or one we wish we could live in. Throughout the 1940’s, America was not only facing pivotal moments that was reflected through films, but film itself was evolving as well. The 40’s was an era of change and challenge for entertainment. The film industry was not at its peak until it rebounded when the nation responded to World War II, thus creating many war movies that would become classics. Many films included themes of patriotism, sacrifice, and heroism which was all meant to be propaganda. Films like Casablanca and Hollywood Canteen reflect this genre trend that occurred during the 1940’s. Films during this decade also elicited the racism in America by using predominately white actors, while …show more content…

At the time, Dr Palmer explains how independent studios had a hard time succeeding while major studios such as 20 Century Fox and Paramount were dominating the HollyWood film industry. Dr. Palmer also dived into how prior to the U.S. vs. Paramount, major studios owned every aspect of production, distribution, contracts with actors, and the way films were exhibited. However, In the late 1940’s the supreme court established the decision to dismantle Hollywood’s system within major studios.. The vertical integration system was not the best but it was booming business when films were doing well. However, this all came to an end and rightfully so because it separated theater chains and block booking. Block booking itself was illegal and forced theater owners to purchase films in groups despite not having any indication of how it would do at the box office. Therefore, the big five productions at the time underwent a massive blow when this all came to a full stop. However, this became the beginning for television to blossom because people weren’t attending movie theaters as much …show more content…

vs. Paramount and block booking was the most intriguing for me because I was unaware of it. Not only was film changing in terms of it’s style but also in the way it was being produced and shown to the masses by major studios. I wholeheartedly understand the Supreme Court’s decision to make movie theaters and studios separate from each other. As far as movie theaters go, it wasn’t fair for owners to purchase movies in bundles despite not being able to see the movie itself beforehand because that isn’t be fair business. Owners would have to deal with the effects of films that were lower than average in order to purchase a movie that would become a blockbuster. The practice itself was unethical and understandable in regards to independent studios who had major trouble selling their movies to

Open Document