Compounding belongs to the linguistic discipline of morphology, which is concerned with the study of the creation, structure and form of words and it is the most significant word formation process next to derivation and conversion. Compounds – the products of compounding - are word combinations of at least two free and already existing morphemes. Hence the basic compound structure is F + F, meaning a free morpheme + another free morpheme. Moreover, there are two different methods of categorizing compounds.
There is one basic definition of the word formation process compounding, namely “compounding as the combination of two words to form a new word” (Plag 133). This definition comprises two substantial presumptions: Firstly, it creates the impression of compounds existing of only two (and not more) elements, – simple compounds - e.g. steam engine, fool proof; secondly, it induces the assumption that these elements are words. However, both presuppositions are in need of clarification. It is true that basic compounds consist of two elements, e.g. apple pie, sleepwalk and nationwide. Nevertheless, there are compounds made up of three, four or five elements – complex compounds -, not necessarily being words, but roots or phrases. For instance tea tree soap bar is seen as a “four-member compound” and university teaching award committee member is regarded as a “five-member compound” (Plag 133); astrophysics would be an example for a compound consisting of the root astro – which cannot stand by itself and is therefore a bound root – and the word physics – neoclassical compound (Plag 155); parks commissioner is a compound of the grammatical word parks and the word commissioner and lastly pipe-and-slipper husband is an example for a phra...
... middle of paper ...
...and spelling is not a reliable indicator for identifying compounds, the consideration to the conjunction test and word or rather element stress is highly recommended.
Works Cited
Bieswanger, Markus und Becker Annette (2010) Introduction to English linguistics. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH + Co.KG.
Jackson, Howard and Amvela, Etienne Zé (2001) Words, meaning and vocabulary: an introduction to modern English lexicology. Trowbridge: The Cromwell Press.
Mair, Christian (2012) English linguistics. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH + Co. KG.
Minkova, Donka and Stockwell, Robert (2009) English words: history and structure. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Plag, Ingo (2008) Word-formation in English. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Yule, George (1996) The study of language. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
First, a brief background in the three dimensions of language discussed throughout this paper. The functional, semantic, or thematic dimensions of language as previously mentioned are often used in parallel with each other. Due, to this fact it is important to be able to identify them as they take place and differentiate between these dimensions i...
Papers on Language and Literature 33:3 (1993). 325-333. The. Ragen, Brian.
Simpson, J. A., and E. S. C. Weiner. The Oxford English dictionary. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1989.Print.
these traditions. By combining these words with a hyphen, Alexie, in turn, intertwines the two to
Words are like vessels—they are merely novel constructions of sounds empty of meaning until we fill them. They mean only what we discern in them, and nothing more. Words are only our impressions of them—imprecise, indefinite, unclear. A single word suggests infinite shades of intensity, quality, or connotation. They are variable, distinct in each era and dialect, even in each language.
9) The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: Third Edition. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1996.
Hill, Jane H., P. J. Mistry, and Lyle Campbell. The Life of Language: Papers in Linguistics in Honor of William Bright. Berlin [etc.: Mouton De Gruyter, 1998. Print.
We borrow them from other languages (sushi), we create them by shortening longer words (gym from gymnasium) or by combining words (brunch from breakfast and lunch).
"Linguistics 201: First Language Acquisition." Linguistics 201: First Language Acquisition. Western Washington University, n.d. Web. 8 Sep. 2013. .
Next, we shall evaluate the key features of language which are; communicative, arbitrary, structured, generative, and dynamic. Communicative, language can allow one to interact with another. According to Willingham (2007), the bond found with the elements in language and what they mean is arbitrary. The way language is set up shows how the symbols are not arbitrary. The set up language shows precisely how intricate it can be. Generative, one is able to build countless number of meanings from words. Dynamic, language never stays the same, therefore it can be known as sporadic. According to Willingham (2007), changes are being made all the time as new words get added and as the ways of grammar change. These elements can be quite critical when it comes to language.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., Svartvik, J. (1985) A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Essex: Longman Ltd.
Fromkin, Victoria, Robert Rodman, and Nina Hyams. An Introduction to Language. 8th ed. Boston: Thomson, 2007.
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & Hyams, N. (2003). An introduction to language (7th ed.). Boston: Heinle.
113-117. 151-195. The. English: A Linguistic Tool Kit, (2012), (U214, Worlds of English, DVD ROM), Milton Keynes, The Open University. English in the World, (2012), (U214, Worlds of English, DVD ROM), Milton Keynes, The Open University.
Center for Applied Linguistics. Why, How, When? N.p.: Center for Applied Linguistics, n.d. www.cal.org. US Department of Education. Web. 3 Mar. 2014.