The English Bill of Rights: The Role Change for the Monarchy

826 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay the bill of right 1689

After William and Mary became the rulers of England, the parliament felt a need to limit the power of the crown. For this, they created The Deceleration of Rights, later known as the Bill of Rights. The English Bill of Rights changed the lives of the people of England and changed the role of citizens in Monarchy. The English Bill of Rights changed the role of citizens in Monarchy by assuring that citizens may petition the King without receiving any punishments, allowing them have the freedom of speech and by assuring that they will not be charged with any odd punishment or a large sum of fine, and making sure that they do not have to give money to the king unless the parliament permits the royalty. This bill mainly reduced the amount of authority a king or queen has over the subject; thus allowing them to live a free and more individual life.
Often people do no naturally receive what they need or want, especially if they live in a kingdom ruled by an absolute monarch. Asking an absolute monarch to fulfil ones need is nothing less than suicide, because history shows that rulers are usually displeased when people petition them. As a result they end up receiving a deadly punishment. The Parliament of England was aware of that when they came up with the Bill of Rights. To prevent such events from occurring, they created a law saying that no king or queen may prosecute subjects for petitioning them. In the English Bill of Rights, it assures the safety of petitioners by saying, “… it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal.” This meant that when a group of people shared a common need and petitioned the king, whether they receive what they want or not, th...

... middle of paper ...

...aking that all the citizens have the right to petition the king without being endangered, by giving them the freedom of speech and less harsh and expensive punishments and by giving them more power over their property, the parliament made the lives of citizens much better. Through these changes, the role of citizens became more effective and impacting, as well as giving people more individuality and freedom over their lives. The English Bill of Rights changed the role of citizens in monarchy and improved it by giving them more power and control over their lives and their property.

Works Cited

"William III (r. 1689-1702) and Mary II (r. 1689-1694)." The British Monarcy. The Royal Household, n.d. Web. 22 Dec. 2013. .

Show More
Related

  • Aristotle And Plato's Influences On The Constitution

    1348 Words  | 3 Pages

    The framers looked at documents from the English government, such as the Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights, to sculpt their government. The Magna Carta limited the king’s power and stated that citizens had certain rights. This meant that the king had to recognise the citizen’s rights, and couldn’t imprisoned or arrest citizens unless convicted of a crime, and they had legal rights, and could have a trial by jury. The Magna Carta is significant because it was one of the most important democratic documents in history. It was important because it said that everybody was subject to the law, unlike a dictatorship, oligarchy, or monarchy. It set up a parliamentary democracy in England, and strongly influenced the American Bill of Rights. Likewise, the English Bill of Rights further restricted the powers of the king. The English Bill of Rights gave everybody certain rights; of these where were the right to trial by jury, no unusual, cruel, or unjust punishments, the right to own a gun, and citizens had to be charged with a crime before they could be sent to prison. The English Bill of Rights was influential to the American Constitution, because in the Constitution, the framers included a Bill of Rights outlining the rights of all citizens. The American Bill of Rights was heavily influenced by the English Bill of Rights. Of these were the right to bear arms, the right to a fair trial, and citizens couldn’t be put in jail without being charged with a

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Bill Of Rights In Education

    422 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments in the constitution. Both the Senate and the House of Representatives use the Bill of Rights as a benchmark for all laws. It has to do with freedom of religion, speech, assembly, and press. It also secures the right to carry a gun, protection against housing soldiers in civilian homes, and more. The Bill of Rights protects various aspects of a free life. Americans live under the protection of the Bill of Rights on a daily basis. Without it, everyone in the U.S. would live restricted lives; no one would be able to petition the government, have a speedy trials, or even be informed of charges. There would also be unreasonable

    Read More

  • Bill Of Rights Dbq

    550 Words  | 2 Pages

    The bill of Rights restricts, guarantes and establishes. It restricts unauthorised taxing without the Parliments approvial, gaurantees that the people will have rights and liberties and establishes england as a monarchy. Both events are crutial to the devolopment of democray. During the Age of reason European thinkers were confident humans could help make a better world, this was from mid-1600s to late 1700s. Also in this time period theres a time known as the scientific revolution. For example there was a man named Galileo in Italy and he corroborated the findings an astronomer named copernicus found by usings a telescope . another example is of a man named Issac Newton and he descovered the laws of planetary motion, invented calculus and explained gravity. Some of a few enlightnment thinkers are John Locke, Baron de Montesquieu and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. John Locke believed in natural law and this is something that is timeless and was here before any king had power. natural law is discovered by using reason for example theft and murder is naturally wrong and people know this and thats why its called natural

    Read More

  • Comparison of US Bill of Rights and The Canadian Charter of Rights

    1400 Words  | 3 Pages

    BACKGROUND OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS The United States Bill of Rights came into being as a result of a promise made by the Fathers of Confederation to the states during the struggle for ratification of the Constitution in 1787-88. A great number of the states made as a condition for their ratification, the addition of amendments, which would guarantee citizens protection of their rights against the central government. Thus, we have a rather interesting situation in which the entrenchment of a bill of rights in the American Constitution was done by the virtual demand of the states, themselves fearing a central government which was not legally constrained and restricted as far as its powers were concerned. The resulting Bill of Rights is appended to the American Constitution as the first of ten amendments.

    Read More

  • Bill of Rights To Protect From Tyranny

    768 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the Constitution was written, the new born nation was immediately split into two political sides, the federalists and the anti-federalists, over the ratification. Federalists, southern planters or people that tended to hold interest in trade, advocated a strong executive. On the other hand, anti-federalists, back country people or people involved in business but not in the mercantile economy, opposed the ratification of the constitution. The two sides, after much debate, were able to come to a compromise after the Bill of Rights was included into the Constitution.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Anti-Federalist And Anti Federalists

    710 Words  | 2 Pages

    We can only guess who different the United States would be now. If there was no bill of rights, it is possible that the freedoms that we see today in the ammendants would be limited or even not exist if the government felt threaten. The government would possibly expand its power and “for the greater good of the american people” would limit our rights. All we have to see how that would work out, is look countries who have strong national government, and see how they taken their peoples freedom ( india, Venezuela, mexico, Pakistan). Countries like these shows us why the push for the bill of rights was so impoartant and how it impacts are lives on a daily basis. The Anti federalist assisted in securing our liberities, by limiting government intervation in the state problems as well as our daily

    Read More

  • King James II: A Reflection of Autonomy and Responsibility

    2008 Words  | 5 Pages

    ...Bill of Rights, a document that would create a great nation, and be the model for the base of another, guaranteed that the people of England would be autonomous and responsible for themselves. They no longer had to accept the whims of an absolutist. They would have a voice.

    Read More

  • The Enlightenment and the Declaration of Independence

    415 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Bill of Rights was created as a listing of the rights granted to citizens, the Bill of Rights serves to protect the people from a powerful government. These civil rights granted to U.S. Citizens are included in the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Additionally, Locke’s ideas about checks and balances and the division of church and state were later embodied in the U.S. Constitution as well. The Constitution replaced a more weakly organized system of government as outlined under the Articles of Confederation. John Locke was an English philosopher who lived during 1632-1704.

    Read More

  • The Rise in Political Power of 17th Century England and France

    530 Words  | 2 Pages

    In England, the parliament because of this need, grew to have power over the king and cause great toleration of people's

    Read More

  • Bill of Rights & Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen

    1278 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Bill of Rights and Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen are based on the same principles of natural rights; therefore each document is similar in protecting the people's natural rights. However, despite their similarities, their differences are apparent due to the social situations in which they were adopted. The Bill of Rights stood to protect the freedoms of each individual by establishing a democratic government. The French Revolution eliminated the hierarchy of class and established equality among men with the Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen. Several influences from past philosophers and documents assisted the frame work of the Bill of Rights and Declaration of Rights and Citizen.

    Read More

  • Research Paper On Mary 1

    948 Words  | 2 Pages

    Master, John. "Mary I Queen of England." Tudor History. N.p., 06 Feb 2012. Web. 2 Dec 2013. .

    Read More

  • The Bill of Rights

    616 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Bill of Rights derives from the Magna Carta, the English Bill of Rights, the colonial struggle against king and Parliament, and a gradually broadening concept of equality among the American people. The bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what no just government should refuse. The absence of a "bill of rights" turned out to be an obstacle to the Constitution's ratification by the states. It would take four more years of intense debate before the new government's form would be resolved. The Federalists opposed including a bill of rights on the ground that it was unnecessary. In the end, popular sentiment was decisive. Recently freed from the despotic English monarchy, the American people wanted strong guarantees that the new government would not trample upon their newly won freedoms of speech, press and religion, nor upon their right to be free from warrant less searches and seizures. So, the Constitution's framers heeded Thomas Jefferson who argued: "A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference." The American Bill of Rights, inspired by Jefferson and drafted by James Madison, was adopted, and in 1791 the Constitution's first ten amendments became the law of the land. Early American mistrust of government power came from the colonial experience itself. Most historians believe that the pivotal event was the Stamp Act, passed by the English Parliament in 1765. Taxes were imposed on every legal and business document.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The English Bill Of Rights And The French Declaration Of The Rights Of Man

    714 Words  | 2 Pages

    The English Bill of Rights (1689) and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man (1789) are roughly around the same period, in that it is possible to think the both documents share similar ideologies. To the thought’s dismay, it is not. Even if both documents start from the same question of taxation, the outputs vary enormously in that each has different aims: the English Bill of Rights (shortened as the English Bill from now on) only changes the crown and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man (shortened as the French Declaration) changes the whole society. However, they are similar in that both strived for the representation of the masses.

    Read More

  • UK's Constitution: The Rule of Law and Parliamentary Sovereignty

    1681 Words  | 4 Pages

    Parliamentary sovereignty, a core principle of the UK's constitution, essentially states that the Parliament is the ultimate legal authority, which possesses the power to create, modify or end any law. The judiciary cannot question its legislative competence, and a Parliament is not bound by former legislative provisions of earlier Parliaments. The ‘rule of law’ on the other hand, is a constitutional doctrine which primarily governs the operation of the legal system and the manner in which the powers of the state are exercised. However, since the Parliament is capable of making any law whatsoever, the concept of the rule of law poses a contradiction to the principle of parliamentary supremacy, entailing that Parliament is not bound by the Rule of Law, and it can exercise power arbitrarily.

    Read More

  • Impact Of The Magna Carta

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Magna Carta influenced other countries to revisit and rewrite laws that benefited the wellbeing of the citizens. For example, the Bill of Rights were the first ten amendments the U.S. was built on. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting

    Read More

More about The English Bill of Rights: The Role Change for the Monarchy

Open Document