The Effect that Private Property Has on the Actions of Individuals

1314 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Karl marx theory of social justice

Private property has been a crucial human right for hundreds of years and has been very influential on the actions of individuals. Private property is having the right to have complete jurisdiction over obtained goods or resources; however, private property usually refers to land owned by a single individual or to a group of individuals. Because private property is controlled by a private owner, one is able to use the product or land to its fullest value creating something of value that contributes to the growth of society. Some political views, such as Socialism and Communism, do not agree that private property has a favorable effect on individuals such as the more socialistic view, influenced by Karl Marx’s ideas that the actions of individuals are not beneficial when having private property. However, most people argue that private property creates a peaceful competition for the control of economic resources. Private property gives individuals full responsibility for their actions concerning their private properties. To most nations around the world, private property is seen as a privilege to have because it is a freedom, such as privacy is a privilege or freedom. One has complete control over a personal belonging. Private property is having the right to do whatever one wants with what he or she owns. President Calvin Coolidge has been quoted as saying, “Ultimately, property rights and personal rights are the same thing.” meaning that having the right to one’s own property is a personal right and privilege one has gained in the quest for universal human rights. Private property owners have the right to do whatever they want with the land and rent out properties or resources. No legislation can tell an individual the actions he... ... middle of paper ... ...ate business owner. The business owners did not have to pay the children much money which meant more profits for the business owners. This then presents the problem of creating a very wide range between the working and upper class. Works Cited American Policy Center. American Policy Center, 2014. Web. . Friedman, Milton, and Rose Friedman. Free to Choose: A Personal Statement. New York: Harvest Book, 1990. Print. Library of Economics. Library Fund, 2008. Web. . Policy Analysis. Cato Institute, 2003. Web. . . Sandefur, Timothy. The Right to Earn a Living. Washington D.C: Cato Institute, 2010. Print. U.S. History. Independence Hall Association, 2008. Web. .

Show More
Related

  • How Did World War II Transform American Society and Government?

    1276 Words  | 3 Pages

    Families with a two-income household had it much easier than those with one. This caused an explosion in the middle class.... ... middle of paper ... ...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Putnam's 'Schooling'

    1446 Words  | 3 Pages

    Putnam refers to this segregation as “residential sorting”, and states that, “residential sorting by income [.] has shunted high-income and low-income students into separate schools,” (163). Rich parents want their kids in the best schools, with the best teachers and the best peers, and are able to afford living in the right areas to send their kids to the right schools. Overall, Robert Putnam’s Our Kids presents an interesting argument about the class inequality in America and the resulting opportunity gap between the upper and lower class. He points out the differences between upper class and lower class family life: upper class have more successful marriages and are better prepared for the bear children, and so their children are better off than the lower class children (61-79).

    Read More

  • Assessment of the Statement that Property is a Power Relationship Between People

    1019 Words  | 3 Pages

    It is often conceptualized that property is the rights of 'ownership'. In common law property is divided into real property, which is the interests in land and improvements there, and personal property, which are interests in anything other than real property. Personal property is divided into tangible property (such as a bike, car and clothse), and intangible property (such as bonds and stocks), which also includes intellectual property (copyrights, trademarks etc). The modern property rights conceive of possession and ownership as belonging to legal individuals, even if the individual is not a real person. Hence, governments, corporations and other collective forms of ownership are shown in terms of individual ownership.

    Read More

  • Social Class and Parents in Public and Private Families: An Introduction by Andrew J. Cherlin

    1181 Words  | 3 Pages

    child to grow on their own. The result is that middle class children have advantages in

    Read More

  • The Progressive Era

    884 Words  | 2 Pages

    With the rise of big business and industrialization came several problems associated with the economic boom. The rich were getting richer. The poor were getting poorer. The gap between the "haves" and the "have nots

    Read More

  • The Negative Impact Of The Industrial Revolution On American Society

    1194 Words  | 3 Pages

    As stated in the textbook, the wealthiest people were seaport merchants that made their business on imports, exports, banks and insurance companies, and urban real estate. An example would be the Boston Brahmins who were a cluster of old Protestant families in Boston that constituted the city’s social elite by the early 19thcentury. The upper class enjoyed the prosperity industrialization granted them as they achieved luxury and extravagance. Below the social elite was a growing middle class that included lawyers, salesmen, clerks, retail merchants, and accountants. Industrialization provided occupations that allowed people to lift themselves higher in the social strata The middle class took advantage of their increased wages by living comfortably and providing an education for their next generation in order to maintain their social standing.

    Read More

  • Inside Information: The Enron scandal in 2001

    1871 Words  | 4 Pages

    "Milton Friedman." - New World Encyclopedia. N.p., 19 Nov. 2013. Web. 3 May 2014. .

    Read More

  • Income Inequality In Robert Putnam's Our Kids

    1277 Words  | 3 Pages

    In his novel Our Kids, Robert Putnam speaks on about how the 1970’s brought a change in family structures. The family structure of two strong parents and stigma against wedlock births and pre-marital sex quickly began to fade. Birth control and the feminist revolution contributed to these rapid changes. Women began to work and were “in part, freed from patriarchal norms” (Putnam 62). Rather than conforming the female gender role and staying home, having children, and putting food on the table, women actually started to become a part of the economy. They were not as focused on the idea of marriage and finding an economically stable husband to provide for them. The decrease in family structure quickly began to affect opportunity inequality among individuals. Those children with “neo-traditional” marriages are more like to receive a college degree rather than those without. Having a lower-income family reduces educational opportunities children have. While a child from a two-income family may attend a private school with resources that assist them in getting into ivy league schools, a kid from a single parent family may have to attend a public school where there is not even access to a computer lab or extracurricular activities. The lack of education these kids have contributes to their lack of opportunity to receive a college degree. Normally, a college degree allows individuals to receive a higher income than those who just have a high-school diploma. They simply are not exposed to the resources to succeed. This contributes to the inequality of opportunity, and ultimately, the inequality of income. Not only does the structure of family affect the outcome of children, but also the style of

    Read More

  • Causes Of The Great Depression

    3212 Words  | 7 Pages

    The largest reason for the growing gap between the rich and the working-class people was the sudden increase in manufacturing during the 1920’s. The people of the working class were significantly increasing their output, but their wages only increased slightly. For example, the average worker out put from 1923-1929 increased about 32%, but the average income of the worker only increased about 8% (Gusmorino, Main Causes of the Great Depression). Therefore one may conclude that wages only increased one-fourth the amount production increased. Another amazing feat of the manufacturing increase was that prices for goods stayed the same, therefore the executives in the companies were keeping the mass amounts of profit that were now coming into the company. In fact, one can see that top executives in a certain company increased significantly because their salaries from 1923-1929 rose 64% (Gusmorino, Main Cau...

    Read More

  • Separation of the Working and Middle Class Child

    1419 Words  | 3 Pages

    In American society today, childhood is considered a time for learning, exploration, and a chance for a child to make his or her mark on the world. Leading up to the Great Depression, however, childhood for working class children was seen in a different light. Working class children felt pressure to provide for their family, which inhibited them from getting an education and branching out on their own, while middle class children had a greater prospect for education because of the difference in wealth. The Great Depression brought hard times for all Americans and expanded the working class while shrinking the middle class. Because the working class children held close ties and responsibilities to their families and faced more poverty than the middle class, they had a lesser chance to move out of the working class as they had a commitment to work to support their families, or children without families had to support themselves, and had dimmer opportunities for education.

    Read More

  • Marx 's Theory Of Class Conflict

    1079 Words  | 3 Pages

    According to Marx class is determined by property associations not by revenue or status. It is determined by allocation and utilization, which represent the production and power relations of class. Marx’s differentiate one class from another rooted on two criteria: possession of the means of production and control of the labor power of others. The major class groups are the capitalist also known as bourgeoisie and the workers or proletariat. The capitalist own the means of production and purchase the labor power of others. Proletariat is the laboring lower class. They are the ones who sell their own labor power. Class conflict to possess power over the means of production is the powerful force behind social growth.

    Read More

  • Locke, Rousseau, and King

    929 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the existence of man debates over property and inequality have always existed. Man has been trying to reach the perfect state of society for as long as they have existed. John Locke, Jean Jacques Rousseau, and Martin Luther King are three great examples of men who broke down the basics of how property and inequality are related. Each historical figure has their own distinct view on the situation. Some views are similar while others vary greatly. These philosophers and seekers of peace and equality make many great arguments as to how equality and property can impact man and society. Equality and property go hand in hand in creating an equal society. Each authors opinion has its own factors that create a mindset to support that opinion. In this paper we will discuss the writings of John Locke, Jean Jacques Rousseau, and Martin Luther King Jr. and the factors that influenced their opinions on inequality and property.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between The Neolithic And Industrial Revolution

    759 Words  | 2 Pages

    the middle class was growing in size and influence, and the working poor were leaving their

    Read More

  • Rousseau and Marx: Property and Inequality

    1831 Words  | 4 Pages

    ... in a way that lead to inequality. Marx similarly argues that private property has led to inequality, because it has put the means of production into the hands of the bourgeoisie, thereby subjugating the proletariat. Even though both men resided in different centuries, their theories are similar because they perceived the singular issue of inequality. As theorists they did differ on where equality would lie; Rousseau believed that man had lost equality as he evolved out of the natural state, whereas Marx believed equality had yet to be realized.

    Read More

  • Karl Marx And Private Property: The Right To Property

    1146 Words  | 3 Pages

    In definition, private property is the right of persons and firms to obtain, own, control, employ, dispose of, and bequeath land, capital, and other forms of property. Private property is different from public property in which public property are assets owned by state or government compared to a private business or individual. Yet, in Marx’s opinion, “private property is thus the product, the result, the necessary consequence of alienated labor, of the external relation of the worker to nature and to himself. Private property thus results by analysis from the concept of alienated labor, of alienated man, of estranged labor, of estranged life, o...

    Read More

More about The Effect that Private Property Has on the Actions of Individuals

Open Document