INTRODUCTION
Assessment has been a constant life theme. It has been part of my student learning experience, performance evaluation in the work setting and now an important part of my teaching. I hope to give you a good insight into my understanding, perspectives, biases and attitudes toward the subject of assessment and to further add to this with my experience as a teacher this year.
STUDENT VIEW
A student’s approach to learning and the quality of learning achieved will be influenced by the way in which this learning assessed (Gibbs 1999, Entwistle and Ramsden, 1983). As a student, assessments always provided me with a benchmark: the level I’m at, what going well/not so well and the area for improvement. They provided me with the tools to make decisions about a change in approach to obtain better grades or to make life decisions in order to obtain goals such as college or job placement.
I successfully came through second level assessment and received my first choice for third level. I narrowly missed out on my desired grade in my primary university degree and this had a knock on effect as it reduced my employment prospects. The result was undertaking a postgraduate course to up skill my existing qualification. Again it was difficult to get onto this course due to previous grades, but once on the course my determination saw me achieve higher overall grades than in my primary degree, which in turn opened up more employment opportunities.
My experience here did strike a chord with me with regard to educational and workplace selection assessment. I did accept that there were quotas and limited number of places due to the economics of supply and demand in the education and employment markets, but as Nitko and Brookhart (2006) ...
... middle of paper ...
...ng”, London: room Helm.
Gibbs, G. (1999). “Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn”, in Brown, S. and Glasner, A. (eds.) “Assessment Matters in Higher Education: Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches”, Maidenhead: SRHE/Open University Press.
Irons, A. (2007). “Enhancing Learning Through Formative Assessment and Feedback: Key guides for effective teaching in higher education”. Routledge: Oxon
Knight, P. (ed) (1995). “Assessment for Learning in Higher Education”. London: Kogan Page.
Nitko, A. J., and Brookhart S.M. (2006). “Educational assessment of students”, (5th ed.). NJ:Pearson Merill/Prentice Hall
Popham, W. J. (2005). “Classroom Assessment: What Teachers Need to Know”, (4th. Ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon
Stiggins, S. (2002). “Assessment crisis: the absence of assessment for learning”. Phi Delta
Kappan, 83:10, pp 758-765
Stiggins, R.J., Arter, J., Chappuis, J., & Chappuis, S. (2004). Classroom assessment for student learning: doing it right-using it well. Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81–90. doi:10.1177/003172171009200119
Assessments were not aligned and incongruent with what was happening in the classroom. It was difficult to accurately measure student success (Polikoff, Porter, & Smithson, 2011). One of the greatest contributors to the difficulty of aligning assessments to standards is that the standards are so complex (LaMarca, 2001.) How can a single assessment demonstrate mastery of so much content? Also, some assessments items measure multiple standards. This can be difficult to analyze. Furthermore, some assessment contain content that is neither developmentally appropriate for the intended audience or it may content that is not mentioned in the standards (Polikoff, Porter, & Smithson, 2011). This can be discouraging and frustrating for both students and
Assessments have always been a tool for teachers to assess mastery and for a long time it was just to provide a grade and enter it into the grade book or report card. Through resources in and out of the course, there has been a breath of new life into the research on how to use assessments. They take many forms and fall within the summative or formative assessment category. Sloan (2016) addresses how formative assessments has traditionally been used by teachers to modify instruction, but when we focus on a classroom that is learner-centered “it becomes assessment for learning as opposed to assessment of learning” (slide 4). The fact is, the students are the ones that should be and are the ones using the data we collect through assessments, since it is our way of providing feedback in order
Some teachers only think of summative assessments that are used for reporting grades. When used this way, assessments do not lead to learning. If teachers will effectively use formative assessments to provide students with timely feedback and individualize instruction based on assessment feedback, it will result in enhanced learning (Brink & Bartz, 2017). In order for this to happen schools need to develop a culture of formative assessment. Teachers need to be trained in the use of formative assessments and administration will need to cultivate this change in culture (Brink & Bartz,
In the article Seven Practices for Effective Learning by Jay McTighe and Ken O’Connor, several assessment and grading practices are presented. Characteristics of summative, diagnostic, and formative assessments are outlined. Based on these categories, descriptions of each practice is provided and compared with other typical forms of assessment typically used by teachers in the category. Justifications of how and why the practices enhance student achievement are also revealed.
“Assessment is one of the most effective instructional strategies to increase learning.” (Edutopia)When teachers think about assessment quality, they often focus on the accuracy of the instrument itself- the scope of which the assessment item tasks and scoring rubrics produce accurate information. It is imperative to use the different testing technique to improve learning. By taking tests, students can establish that they are independently capable of expressing their understanding of the material. I will have an opportunity to analyze each student's understanding and ability to apply learned information. I can then decide whether the
Assessment is the systematic process of collecting data to provide insight into students’ learning experiences. Through assessment, educators can provide invaluable feedback to students, parents/carers, the wider community, government and school officials. Moreover, assessment can be a powerful tool for learning that can direct students’ learning experiences throughout their education and beyond (Readman & Allen, 2013). Assessment can be broadly divided into two categories: summative and formative. More recently, the concept of assessment has expanded to include the following types of assessment: assessment for learning, assessment of learning, and assessment as learning.
Assessment has been the greatest challenge in my development as a professional. My coursework as supported my growth in this area, especially in understanding the broad range of assessments used to support students’ growth and development. My courses have also supported my understanding of how ongoing observational assessment and standards-based measures can be used to inform instruction and support the cycle of observation, reflection and planning. Coursework
The National Education Association suggests that assessment is a “continuous flow of evidence that can only be provided by classroom assessment.” (NEA, 2003) Balanced assessments can actually promote student learning and achievement. “To maximize student success, assessment must be seen as an instructional tool for use while learning is occurring, and as an accountability tool to determine if learning has occurred.” (NEA, 2003)
Marwick, J. (2007). Assessment: The Key to Teaching and Learning. The AMATYC Reivew, 28(2), pp. 57-59.
Stiggins, R., Arter, J., Chappuis, J., Chappuis, S., (2007). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it right -- using it well. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson.
Weeden, P., Winter, J. and Broadfoot, P. (2002) Assessment: What’s in it for Schools? London:Routledge
Through assessment students and teachers are able to determine the level of mastery a student has achieved with standards taught. Both formative and summative assessment should be purposeful and targeted to gain the most accurate data to drive further instruction (Ainsworth, 2010). While this syllabus does a good job of identifying the need for both formal and informal assessments, the way in which this is communicated does not provide enough detail for understanding. Simply listing assessment types does not give any insight into how these assessments fit in the learning process of this course. While some of the assessments mentioned could be common assessments chosen by the school or district to gain insight into the effectiveness of instruction, the inclusion of authentic assessments is most beneficial to students and demonstrates learning in a context closer to that of a work environment (Rovai, 2004). Unfortunately, this particular course, according to this syllabus, relies heavily on quizzes and traditional tests and essays to form the bulk of assessment opportunities. While other activities, such as formative assessments, journaling and discussions are mentioned as possible avenues for scoring, they are given a very low percentage of the overall grade. This shows that they are not valued for their ability to show progression and mastery. If this is indeed the case, this puts the students as a
As I reflect on my past assessment process, I realized how much my assessments have changed over the years. In my early years, I used tests for informational recall as my assessments. I felt these were appropriate guidelines in which I needed to follow in order to substantiate a student’s grade. Every assignment or tests was given a point value and then based on the amount of points, a grade was given. Every student’s assessment was exactly the same, and the assessments did not contain any subjectivity. I felt confident in giving the grade based on a valid point system. However reflecting back, I see that I did not include any performance-based assessments or individual learning styles in my early assessment. I also did not take into consideration the individual needs of my students. My assessment approach was awful. I am embarrassed that I use to assess students in this manner.