Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on innovation and creativity
How school kills creativity
How school kills creativity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on innovation and creativity
If you want to be a creative person, you should be far away from school. Nowadays, the topic of the relationship between innovation and creativity has attracted attention from all aspects of society. At most situations, schools do affect innovation. But instead of saying schools “suppress” creativity, it is more accurate to say school “affect” education.
First of all, the creative ability is controlled by cognitive ability. A person keeps learning thing after his born. People will have higher cognitive ability if they spend more time in learning. In order to prove what the relation between cognitive ability and creative ability is, the researchers in the university of Pennsylvania conducted by Sharon made an experiment to test whether reduced cognitive control might be advantageous in some circumstances. The method that they took in the experiment is called TDCS which lets participants see every-day objects and be asked to come up with uses for these objects that are out of ordinary. The participants are divided into three groups according to their age and the education they accepted in their life. For example, the participants of first group are selected from elementary schools. The participants in second groups high school students. Finally, the last group of participants are the elderly people who are in their age of over 65. The result of the experiment shows that children from elementary school apparently have more to contribute toward the uses that are out of ordinary. In the same way, the high school students do a better job that the elderly people to the same issue. The experimental result shows that high levels of cognitive control may be a disadvantage in some circumstances, such as in early development. Furthe...
... middle of paper ...
...e in leading their students to excavate their potential creative ability and helps to develop it.
Works Cited
Thompson, Sharon, and Evangelia Chrysiou. "Penn Researchers Show That Suppressing the Brain's "Filter" Can Improve Performance in Creative Tasks." Penn News. Cognitive Neuroscience, 13 Mar. 2013. Web. 09 Apr. 2014.
Robinson, Ken. "Sir Ken Robinson: Do Schools Kill Creativity?" Do schools Kill Creativity? Los Angeles. 6 Jan. 2007. YouTube. Web. 08 Apr. 2014.
Abrahamsen, Eric. "A Liberal Arts Education, Made in China." Latitude A Liberal Arts Education Made in China Comments. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Apr. 2014.
Zonta, Victor Llanque. "Do Schools Kill Creativity?" Do Schools Kill Creativity? N.p., n.d. Web. 15 Apr. 2014.
Sternberg, Robert J. "The Experts Speak on Creativity and Innovation." Review. n.d.: n. pag. Web. .
Shaughnessy, M. F., & Wakefield, J. F. (2003). Creativity: Assessment. In N. Piotrowski & T. Irons-Georges (Eds.), Magill's encyclopedia of social science:Psychology (pp. 459-463). Pasadena, CA: Salem Press.
All students, and children especially, have tremendous talents, which are forgotten when their minds walk through the school door. Their forever developing talents and favorite interests are left for an uncreative school environment. I, for one, have always been taught and believed in an education, or following the guidelines of another, was essential in achieving wealth and success later in life. However, after listening to Robinson’s argumentative speech, I realize creativity and a valued education coincide with each other. To justify myself, creativity and thinking outside the box has led to many of the world’s advancements. Therefore, when teaching future leaders, and future generations of employees and employers, teaching creativity in a forever rapidly changing and unpredictable world would have benefits. At last, I believe that the educational system puts too much emphasis on a substantial, everyday American future over one’s happiness in a later life. Every human being is already born a unique artist, never made into one; constantly growing into a more talented
Robinson, Ken. “How Schools Kill Creativity.” Online video clip. TED. Ted, Feb 2006. Web. 26 March 2014.
Sporre, Dennis J. The Creative Impulse: An Introduction to the Arts. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1996. 310-378.
"Killing creativity." The Economist. The Economist Newspaper, 17 Apr. 2004. Web. 28 Mar. 2014. .
...would be further motivated to love and study their subjects, and not be just thinking only about grades. If all teachers dedicate their human potential to their students, then students wouldn’t be scared to participate in discussions in spite of many stumbling barriers. The issues Ernest Boyer discusses in “Creativity in the Classroom” are of current interest not only in American educational system, but in my country as well. So,I would recommend this article to be discussed at teachers’ meetings in different types of educational institutions because the criteria of successful and creative teaching the author identifies in his article are universal and simple at the same time: just be dedicated to your job, care about your students, and don’t be afraid to learn and use new ideas in your classroom. Hence, creativity in the classroom often begins with a good teacher.
With the scheduling of their parents, they have no opportunity to let their minds wander without guidelines. Moreover, the structure put in place has taken away the opportunity for children to develop their own interests outside of what others tell them. Furthermore, they are given countless opportunities to develop their knowledge without room for creativity, and hence become a shallow adult. She argues that creativity leads to the great artists, authors, and composers. Consequently, Quindlen’s argument is that scheduling has stunted children’s creative
In their article, “The Creativity Crisis”, authors Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman explore the urgency of the downfall in the public’s “creativity quotient.” Bronson and Merryman emphasize the necessity for young children to be imaginative. Through an IBM poll, they verify that with the decrease of creativity in our society comes an array of consequences seen in the work field. The authors remind readers of another reason for the importance of creativity; they argue that creative ideas can solve national matters. Hence, Branson and Merryman believe that original ideas are key for a better world. Though I concede that creativity is a vital key to the solution of many national problems, I still insist that teaching creativity,
This shows how much society has changed since the 1900’s. Modern-day children are worse in almost every aspect of creative thinking when compared to previous generations. Society is hurting children’s imagination by not being supportive of outside time and social connections. With modern electronic devices, kids seldomly need to leave the house in order to be entertained. The lack of play time and social interactions severely hamper the development of children’s creativity. In summary, society is developing into something that lacks encouragement of creativity, and that is a major
He opened my eyes to really think about how the education system is taking away children’s creativity. School systems are so focused on being college and career ready, they decapitating the creative capacities students have. I have observed personally how teachers will stigmatize mistakes. When observing a classroom and student does an art project, but the teacher takes points away because it was not what they imagined what the picture should be of. At schools today, math and language are offered at least an hour every day, but students are lucky to get an art or music class for thirty minutes each week. I think that all the tests put on teachers to prepare students has caused the breaking away from creativity even more. Teachers are so worried about getting the mandatory information to the class that they forget about the creative side of teaching. Ken Roberson explains it in a way that gets people engaged and listening about this situation without them realizing at what extent. Just like Sir Ken Roberson, I believe it is our job to educate all parts of a person to help impact the future. It is my duty to find ways to motivate my students in the classroom to be creative and create a future of people that is gaining more than head
I am writing an essay over the film of Ken Robinson: Do schools kill creativity? The audience for the essay I am writing will be my classmates and teacher, Heather J. Mathers, from my Ivy tech English 111-14h class. The video I am writing about took place in 2006, which is very worrisome, it is now 8years later and we are seeing the exact effects of what was discussed. My purpose or hope for this essay is too help spread the word and knowledge that we understand what is now happening from the school systems killing creativity. I hope to answer questions and open eyes of others to see that creativity is a vital skill that we should not be punished or thought of as a negative thing. I hope to be a part of a movement that embraces all things
In this notable Ted Talk video "Do schools kill creativity?", Sir Ken Robinson discusses how public education systems demolish creativity because they believe it is essential to the academic growth and success of students. Robinson created a broad arrange of arguments to persuade the viewers to take action on this highly ignored issue, and he primarily focuses on how important creativity is. There are classes within schools that help utilize creativity, but they are not taken seriously by adults in society. Therefore, the value of creative knowledge decreases. Robinson uses an unusual combination of pathos and ethos to make an enjoyable dispute for implementing an education system that nurtures rather than eats away at creativity.
... activations after training in Creative task during a period of time to see the possible enhancement of creativity in the central nervous system. Although the complexity of the creative process difficult direct application and clear classroom strategy, neuroscientific knowledge can be shared to recognise creativity in an educative environment.
... environment for acquiring the skills needed for creative living. Creativity is latent in the human at birth. The environment of the child can stimulate or suppress its development. It is the school's responsibility to establish an environment that encourages creativity and provides outlets for it" (46).
There is a magnitude of research put behind trying to find the link between creativity and...