Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on importance of spirituality
Essay on importance of spirituality
Essay on importance of spirituality
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on importance of spirituality
Within the Christian tradition, followers of Jesus have traditionally maintained that they have a personal and understandable relationship with God. They seek to develop this relationship and to more closely know their God, whom they view as being personable and approachable. In order to develop this relationship, Christians have searched for thousands of years to recognize the proper course of daily action to live a life pleasing to God. Part of this proper course of action is avoiding the trappings of the material world that hinder our relationship with God. Donald Miller, author of Blue Like Jazz, sites living without people to encourage growth as one of the largest barriers that must be passed and Thomas Merton adds an inability to fully accept vocations and make decisions as an obstacle that must be cleared before enjoying the fullness of an uninhibited relationship with God.
Donald Miller believes that humans are social creatures who cannot prosper if they are continuously isolated from the rest of society. Miller asserts that the inner soul of humans not only craves interaction but also cannot survive without it. The reason for this according to Miller is simply because God designed us that way. Why is it so important for us to maintain healthy social relationships? The first key advantage of social relationships is it guarantees that we keep a tight grasp on reality and what is and isn’t accepted in the society around us. Miller reminisces of a time he was so persistently lonely, he began to invent fictional friends to interact with because his soul so desired social contact. If people lose track of this social reality, they become unable to interact efficiently and effectively with their fellow human beings. This becomes a problem if, as Miller believes, loving your fellow humans is a little slice of heaven (173).
Living alone consistently is also an issue because it keeps one from living and participating in community.
The continuous reading of Cornelius Plantinga Jr.’s book Engaging God’s World: A Christian Vision of Faith, Learning, and Living, has left me lingering on a lot of thoughts towards my relationship with God. In the conclusion of his book, Plantinga focuses on the redemptive qualities of God as well the the redemptive possibilities of mankind. Another main subject is the vocation in the Kingdom of God, correspondingly the Bible says in Romans 12:2, “Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your minds, so that you may discern what is the will of God- what is good and acceptable and perfect.” Plantinga (2002) states clearly, “given Jesus’ summons, his followers have always understood that to be a ‘Christ person’
Recognizing God is a part of our vocation within community can be confusing for us, how can we serve God in the different venues of our life when the world teaches such differing views? We are encouraged to share our witness, testimony, and service within our families, workplace, and our social settings. Family includes the household within our life touching upon each role parent, child, and spouse. It becomes acceptable to compartmentalize the areas of our life and serve in comfortable areas. Consumerism and societal pressures challenge us to withdraw from the Spirit when we feel intimidated, out of place, or even unworthy of God’s involvement in our life. We are called to be “the salt of the earth”, accepting the challenge to unite God’s calling upon our whole-life. According to Migliore, “United in Christ by the power of the Spirit we are one community; we are members of one body and mutually dependent on one another. Recognizing God works with all areas of community unites families, workplace, and social settings together.
In The DNA of Relationships, there were two things that made me aware of what I had not thought of doing. First, I was aware that I shouldn’t give others the power to control my feelings. The statement stood out to me about how I can focus on the person and take the right steps of personal responsibility to refuse attention of what the person has done. The “not giving anyone the power to control my feelings” statement interacted me that I should give care to those who the person is, rather than what the person had done, that would build up our relationships. From here, I see the concept fitting me into my understanding of my faith and the Gospel in daily living. When I will be open to people that would have problems, I will help the person, but not the problem. Second, I was aware that I couldn’t force the other person to change. The statement stood out to me about how I cannot change people or even their personalities because they are not me
... authors conclude that it is through alienation within a small society that ultimately leads to the primary characters’ demise and death. Whether their individual cases are self imposed or externally imposed, the results and the impact are the same, annihilation of the human soul. Their craft make emphatic use of setting to the successful depiction of this theme. Both characters ultimately fall into the abyss of loneliness and despair proving that human existence cut-off and on its own is more destructive than positive . Thus their message seems to suggest that as humans, we need society in order to truly belong and have a connection, purpose and worth in this life, in order to truly live.
‘An individual’s interaction with others and the world around them can enrich or limit their
This classic love story describes how people can change once they interact with other people. Moreover, this is an example of how human beings in general need interaction to be normal functioning citizens of society. Having relationships, can make a person feel better about him and can possibly revolutionize or emerge a personality that was quiescent due to lack of interaction. This video demonstrates many facets of interpersonal communication.
The first influential factor to the atrophy of social life that Eitzen writes about is moving away. Americans nowadays are always on the go – if moving is the most convenient idea, they will move with no regard to formed relationships that will soon be broken. People are often forced to move in order to follow a job or because of problems within the family. Constantly moving about causes a decline in intimate relationships. This is also true in people who live alone. The lack of regular and reliable social interaction can lead to a less sociable personality and less motivation to form real relationships. Real relationships are what lead to a healthy social life.
“Social” networks and loneliness are two very unlike things to be discussed simultaneously... The two are complete opposite of one another: “social” is associated to relating to one’s society, loneliness can be defined as “a complex and unpleasant emotional response to a feeling of isolation” (Ye and Lin 166). While loneliness can mean solitude, it also includes feelings of isolation and disconnection to other people (Ye and Lin 166). John Cacioppo is labeled as the world’s leading expert on loneliness. He proposed a thought provoking analogy: a car can be used to pick up friends, but one chooses to ride alone. Did the car make the person lonely? (Marche 68). Absolutely not. The car is simply a tool in the person’s everyday life. This relates
In his book Deepening Community : Finding Joy Together in Chaotic Times Paul Born states that “no amount of innovation, individual brilliance, or money can transform our broken society as effectively and sustainably as building community” (1). Having people to go to and express your feelings to is important because it helps relieve emotional stress that could be problematic. Although responsibility can sometimes be painful because the outcome can be unexpected and disastrous. Victor Frankenstein creates this creator who views the world in a naive and child life way because Frankenstein fails to accept the consequences of his actions. The creature is rejected by anyone who comes in contact with him and he asks Frankenstein “why did you form a monster so hideous that even YOU turned from me in disgust?” (Shelley 8). To summarize Daniel W Russell et al, perspective in the article "Is Loneliness the Same as Being Alone?,” being lonely and alone can make one feel unwanted or bad about themselves. When we have friends and family to be around there is a feeling of being safe and being loved. Therefore, company is crucial to an individual because we learn from each other (
The role of relationship you have with other people often has direct influence on the individual choices and belief in the life. In the short story “on the rainy river”, the author Tim O’Brien inform us about his experiences and how his interacted with a single person had effected his life so could understand himself. It is hard for anyone to be dependent on just his believes and own personal experience, when there are so many people with different belief to influence you choices and have the right choices for you self. Occasionally taking experience and knowledge of other people to help you understand and build from them your own identity and choices in life.
However, in spite of Mary Shelly’s warning, it seems man has gone forward with its creation. Yet the result has not been a world of death and destruction, but a world of connectivity and immediate satisfaction. Sherry Turkle writes “we look to the network to defend us against loneliness even as we use it to control the intensity of our connections” (Turkle, 274). Before the postal system it could take months before hearing from someone across the country. In today’s age a text message contains the same thought of reaching a person thousands of miles away, with the added benefit of instant gratification. This instant gratification, in the eyes of Turkle, “redraws the boundaries of intimacy and solitude,” (Turkle, 272). At face value the boundaries of intimacy and solitude are in fact merely human construction, it is impossible to change the mode of communication without changing boundaries. In this case, while some barriers are constructed between humans physically, many more paths open for human interaction on an intellectual level. Perhaps the future is not the interactions of human physically, but the interaction of minds through a common source, such as the
Turkle provides dialogues of individuals who avoid social interactions at all cost and would rather communicate through technology, as it is just an inconvenience to have direct confrontations. These dialogues strongly support Turkle’s argument that we’re creating a greater gap between others and ourselves. The reason we are lonely is because we place less effort into building relations with others.
Social interaction is a vital part of everyday life for a majority of people. Everyday people of all ages, races and genders communicate and interact with each other; it has become such a common theme in society that it is taken for granted just how vital social interaction is for humans. Without social interaction humans can have serious physical and mental effects.
I’d like to state the most obvious observation that I’ve made about spiritual formation; that is that I will always need to be seeking for ways to nurture my personal spirituality throughout my life. I know that to most people this may sound like a “duh” statement, but for me it has truly become a reality and one that I must admit I have been struggling to embrace. I was brought up in a church that, like most traditional churches, stayed happy living in the “comfort zone” of their Christianity. They took everything that the Bible said at face value without digging in to find out why they believed what they believed. I had never been challenged to look deeper into the text. In the past few years I have felt the need to tunnel out of this cave of what I feel is best labeled “Christian ignorance”. In the process though, I have had to come to terms with letting go of the things that brought me comfort and provided me with what I thought it took to have a close relationship with God. Some of those things were tangible. Most were not. The things that were the least tangible actually ended up being the hardest to let go of.
The individual ability to have friendly ties with others will have satisfying relationships which in turn will help him to survive and grow in the society. Having Positive Relations with Others and the ability to love is viewed as the central component of mental health. Individuals high on this factor are described as having strong feelings of compassion and warmth for all human beings. This aspect refers to being capable of displaying great love, deeper friendship, and positive identification with others. The importance of positive relations with others is repeatedly stressed in most theories of psychological wellbeing. Ryff (1989) defined positive relations with others as heartfelt, trusting interpersonal relations and strong outlooks of empathy and