The Different Theories of Easter Island’s Collapse

1051 Words3 Pages

The Different Theories of Easter Island’s Collapse Easter Island, or as some would call it “Rapa Nui,” was one of the most isolated islands in the world that was inhabited by humans. The island does not have a lot of wood and other resources and yet, when the first travelers discovered the island, it was full of huge carved stones statues. Around the twentieth century they discovered that when the first settlers came to the island, it was rich with resources and bountiful land. The first settlers also had a complex society with a hierarchy and sophisticated religious rituals. According to Barzin Pakandam, from the London School of Economics, The inhabitants of Rapa Nui are the descendants of a group of Polynesian settler colonists. It was estimated that at first there were only twenty to thirty settlers that arrived on the island. They arrived on large conjoined sea-faring canoes built for long distance travel. The settlers brought many traditional Polynesian staple foods with them including chickens, rats (considered a delicacy), taro, yam, sweet potato, bananas, gourds, paper mulberry, turmeric, and arrowroot. Archaeologists and historians assume that the origins of the Islanders are the archipelago chain of the Mangareva’s (Pakandam, 2009, p. 9). First, researchers were interested in how these settlers carved the statue and transported them all over the island, but they changed their focus to the theories of how the islanders was driven to collapse. The researchers came up with different theories as to why the islanders were driven to collapse and they are still debating which theory is the right one. One of the first theories as to why the islanders were driven to collapse was that the islanders overexploited the natural re... ... middle of paper ... ...ted investigations of sediment archives in the crater lake of volcano Rano Raraku which contradict this hypothesis. On the basis of pollen data they found no evidence for a significant impact of rats proceeding anthropogenic woodland destruction” (2008, p. 24). Another scientist also found evidence that the rats were not abundant and was valued as currency for the Polynesian people. Brown (2006 [1924]) found that the Pacific rats were valued as currency by the islanders in the past, this report shows that rats were not abundant, but few on the island, and so the islanders will look at the animals as a valuable food source, not as a major environmental problem (2006 [1924]). Meith also conducted some research based on the intensive analysis of soils and sediments at several sites, and he also disagrees with the hypothesis of a major rat overpopulation (Mieth, 2010).

More about The Different Theories of Easter Island’s Collapse

Open Document