Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics of New Public Management
Characteristics of New Public Management
Characteristics of New Public Management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Characteristics of New Public Management
Developing Countries and New Public Management Introduction The expectation for the government to become better in business has been becoming a hot topic for many countries around the world. Countries are trying to push their effort in order to produce the best performance in the public sector management. There are many schemes of government business theory, or even practice, which could be used by the government in order to produce better quality of public governance. One of the methods is the new public management. The basic idea of the new public management is adopting the business process of private sector. The new public management, theoretically, is giving a set of point of view how the government should work by pointing out efficiency, responsiveness, accountability and transparency (Gow and Dufour, 2000, 578; Sarker, 2006: 180). It seems that the new idea of government management very useful to reduce problems that faces by many governments, such as crummy policies, unresponsive bureaucracies, mismanagement process and focusing on input and output results rather than outcomes. Regardless that the new public management is very useful in theory, but in reality, most of the countries are very hard to implement it and find their self in the middle of nowhere (Manning, 2001: 300). The fact that the new model of public administration, somewhat, is likely not suitable for most governments in their business. This case is not only for developing countries, but also for developed countries. Maybe, to some extent, there is one example of country that able to follow the nature of new public management. New Zealand is one of the example country that success to carry out the concept of new public management (Schick, 1998: 123 – 131; M... ... middle of paper ... ...Journal Of Research And Theory, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 121 – 132. Sarker, A. E., 2006, ‘New Public Management In Developing Countries, An Analysis Of Success And Failur With Particular Reference To Singapore and Bangladesh’, International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 180 – 203. Schick, A., 1998, ‘Why Most Developing Countries Should Not Try New Zeland Reforms’, The World Bank Research Observer, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 123 – 131. Turner, M., 2002, ‘Choosing Items From The Menu, New Public Management In Southeast Asia’, International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1493 – 1512. Villanueva, L. A., 2011, Public Governance For Results: A Conceptual And Operational Framework, Committee Of Experts On Public Administration Tenth Session 2011, Economic And Social Council of United Nations, New York, 4 – 8 April 2011, pp. 1 – 17.
Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. K. (2012). The tangled web: Unraveling the principle of common goals in collaborations. Journal of public administration research & theory, 22(4), 731-760.
The main aim of public service is to deliver services that are of need to its people. How fast a public manager can address its people’s problem and concerns indicates its effectiveness. Responsiveness of the manager develops trust between him, the government, and the people. According to (Rainey, p106) bureaucratic responsiveness implies two things; responsiveness to the people’s wishes or responsiveness to the interest of the government.
Singapore as a country has had various transformations throughout its history, however the period 1950 and 1970 was quite critical. Much of these changes had a lot to do with the development of trade and manufacturing. This is without forgetting the financial sector where the intention was to come up with a financial hub that could be used in economic development. Looking at the case of Singapore, we would say that it is a productive economy with a very high market competition. This observation has been further clarified by the Swiss International Institute for Management Development, going with their report that they released in the year 2001 (Chellaraj & Mattoo, 2009). In this study, we intend to evaluate the case of political economy of development in Singapore and examine the tensions between the state and various economic institutions. In additions to examining this institution, we would also like to examine how these variables have contributed towards the attainment of favorable growth rates and economic prosperity.
Harold A. Crouch. 1985. Economic change social structure and political systems in Southeast Asia: Philippine development compared with the other Asian countries. Institute of southeast Asian studies
Berg, Andrew, and Jonathan Ostry. "Finance and Development." IMF. Equality and Efficiency, Sept. 2011. Web. 06 May 2014.
Entering the 21st. Century – World Development Report 1999/2000. World Bank 2000. Oxford University Press. New York, NY 2000.
U.S. Department of State. (2010, October 9). Background note: Singapore. Retrieved April 4, 2011 from http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2798.htm
In the future I would like to see myself, as a continuously promoted public official who could possibly become a pro-active politician in today’s demanding political arena. To achieve this, I would like to gain more knowledge which can help me reach intellectual maturity to the latest practices adopted in the field of Public Administration. My desire for self-development in this area and curiosity to learn past and contemporary developments in different societies will help me to solve the problems easily.
Public Administration involves the development, implementation and management of policies for the attainment of set goals and objectives that will be to the benefit of the general public. Since Public Administration involves taking decisions that affect the use of public resources there is often the question of how to utilize public resources for maximum public good. The National Association of Public Administration has identified four pillars of public administration: economy, efficiency, effectiveness and social equity. These pillars are equally important in the practice of public administration and to its success. This paper seeks to explain the role of each of the pillars in the practice of public administration.
Sapru R.K. (2008) P370 argues that New Public Management (NPM) is a new model of public sector management which emerged in the beginning of the 1990 in response to the challenges of globalization, global competitivenes...
NAZ, M. E. (2003). ORIGIN, IDEAS AND PRACTICE OF NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT:LESSONS FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Asian Affairs , 33.
The study of public administration only continued to grow over the course of the next two decades. As the study of public administration expanded, so did the development of s...
The New Public Management plays a valuable role as a policy tool and as a means by which to advance rhetoric of efficiency, prudence and efficacy in state management, at a time when these values had re-emerged as a primary driving force behind mass-liberation of national economies and the international political economy in general . This new policy was implemented with a mind to change the old running of the public sector into a new form by imitating the business style of the private sector. This is because some of the politicians felt that the public servants lucked the drive and determination of the many citizens that worked outside of the public sector. So the idea was to become more like the private sector in terms of implementing better services to the citizens, as well as being more challenging when producing policies which conflict with others in the public sector. One of the major reasons why this policy gained more than enough support in earlier years was as a result of the Cold War.
Max Weber, Henri Fayol and Luther Halsey Gulick all addressed issues, concerning how an overall organization should be structured, bureaucratic administration, while Frederick Taylor’s theory of scientific management concentrated on techniques for increasing production (Tomkins, 2005). This essay will focus on the disadvantages and the advantages, including the effective and efficient components, of bureaucracy in public management.
According to Villanueva (2013 internet source)Public administration involves government officials or public officials that apply particular policy and approaches inside a specific sphere or level of government, normally in the local level of government. Public administrators must ensure and promise that all facets of a particular policy or approach in a state are fulfilled and applied in the correct way.