Pathology Vs Forensic Anthropology

836 Words2 Pages

Forensic anthropology is a subfield of physical anthropology that involves the examination of skeletal remains within a medico-legal context, with the intention of identifying individuals (Randolph-Quinney et al., 2009). When identifying skeletal remains, a biological profile is created in order to reduce the number of possible identities (Dayal et al., 2008). The biological profile of an individual was traditionally comprised of the individual’s biological sex, age-at-death, ancestry and living stature; however, nowadays aspects such as pathologies, anti-mortem trauma and factors of individualisation are also included (Dirkmaat et al., 2008). Forensic anthropologists are frequently faced with skeletal remains which are mutilated, fragmented or missing (Işcan, 1988), due to …show more content…

Stature, as defined by Baines et al. (2011), is the living individual’s natural standing height in an upright position which can be estimated using various methods. Such methods include the anatomical method and the mathematical method (Sjøvold, 2000). The Anatomical method The anatomical method, alternatively known as Fully’s technique (Lundy, 1985), involves the reconstruction of the total skeletal height of an individual by measuring various skeletal elements. These measurements include the basi-bregmatic height of the skull, the height of the vertebral column from C2 to S1, the length of the femur in its natural position (oblique length), the maximum height of the tibia (excluding the spine, on the proximal end, and the malleolus, on the distal medial end) and the height of the articulated talus and calcaneus from the foot (Sjøvold, 2000). In order to convert the total skeletal height to living stature, compensation for the soft tissue of the intervertebral discs, joint cartilages, skull and soles of the feet occurs, by the inclusion of a soft tissue correction factor which was stated initially by Fully (1956) but was

Open Document