Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
corporate strategy of dell
dells business strategy
corporate strategy of dell
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: corporate strategy of dell
Dell Analysis
In spite of Dell’s Direct Model strategy, the company had lost any price advantage it had over its competitors. Dell also had an issue with channel inventory availability driven by the fact that their competitors were attempting to replicate their strategy. This was a large threat to the organization because they so heavily relied on just-in-time delivery of parts. Dell’s competitors faced many challenges to the direct distribution method, however. According to Exhibit 8 in the case (“Ratings of PC Vendors by Corporate Mangers with PC-buying Responsibility”), channel based support was rated the lowest on all scales, showing that this was Dell’s riskiest area as well.
Internal Analysis
Strengths and Weaknesses
Dell’s main strength lies in their perfection of the Direct Model, which boasts a production process that lasts only a day and a half so the company is able to serve customers quickly and has the capacity to withstand very large orders. Dell built held no finished goods inventory on hand, which helps to reduce idle assets and risk. The company maintained excellent relations and communication with suppliers who were able to adhere to Dell’s just-in-time inventory management and allowed suppliers to send shipments direct to customers, reducing inefficiency. Dell encouraged suppliers to locate their facilities in close proximity to assembly operations. Additionally, Dell had very high customer service and support satisfaction and maintained some of the best performance metrics in the industry. Finally, their main source of revenue came from businesses and large government institutions and no single customer represented more than 2% of their sales, which lowers their risk of buyer power.
One of the firm’s...
... middle of paper ...
...rosoft operating systems) so if relations between a particular supplier and the firm go awry, the firms can seek other suppliers to do business with. There is also little difference in the supplier’s products.
Overall Analysis of Industry Attractiveness
Overall, the computer industry is relatively attractive. The potential for future growth is high but new competitors must face the threat posed by already established, well-known brands. There are relatively few substitutes for computers and the power of suppliers and buyers is low. New companies would likely be able to successfully yield a profit. Companies have been relatively successful in this industry throughout its history. It is important that all firms in the industry are able to keep up with ever changing cutting edge technology, however.
**paper is based on a case study from Harvard Business Review**
PC industry is affected by two opposite forces: technological advance that pushes the industry forward and the industry sensitivity to economical stagnation (if the economical situation is bad customers won't upgrade their computers).
Orders have to be placed ahead to need time due to size or valueWith international orders constant change in exchange rates could leave Dell at a potential loss of parts from it supply chainPrice differential is becoming smaller with competitive marketDell competitors are a price threats in the computer industryThe computer that is the fastest, most advance in technology, most durable, and user-friendly is increase it share of the market
Based on the external environment and the historical perspective of Dell, Michael Dell needs to realize that his nearly 20 year-old business model needs a dramatic change. He needs to get the product in customers hands (before point-of-sale), focus on quality customer support/service, and use customer indicators as a sign of what areas need improvement/enhancement within the company. Additionally, limited options based on narrow-minded perceptions (only using Intel chips) not only cost Dell market share, it also cost them on the bottom line (Operations). Not listening to the needs and wants of loyal consumers can result in a loss of market share, which is what Dell has experienced.
Dell Inc., with fiscal 2005 net revenue of $49.2 billion, is a premier provider of products and services worldwide that enable customers to build their information-technology and Internet infrastructures. Dell offers a broad range of enterprise systems (servers, storage, workstations, and networking products), client systems (notebook and desktop computer systems), printing and imaging systems, software and peripherals, and global services. During calendar 2004, Dell was the number one supplier of personal computer systems worldwide as well as in the United States. Dell's global market leadership is the result of a persistent focus on delivering the best possible customer experience by selling products and services directly to customers.
Spanning over 20 years, the company has always been associated with designing, manufacturing and customizing products and services to satisfy a diversified range of customers including individual customers to corporate and retailing businesses. The company's philosophy to deal with customers one-on-one has become a management model for other companies. Having gained the market leadership position in computer products and services, Dell's team have always been careful in sustaining its marketing strategy of providing standard-based computing solutions (Official Website 2004).
Dell is one of the renowned companies in the world. If someone is asked to name the companies, which sell computers, he/she will definitely include the name of Dell (Martin 2002). In fact, it is widely accepted brand in the world. However, with the arrival of rival companies, post 2007, for Dell, it was testing to stay alive in the race in the computer industry. Dell in effect is acknowledged by some experts as one of the vulnerable brands. Hence, it would be preemptive for the corporation to continue to exist in the contest, where big companies, such as Apple and Acer have dominated the market by this
Dell Computers Strategy Global companies play an important role in the business environment, because they connect their businesses together around the world. A good example of a global company is Dell Inc., an American computer-hardware company, headquartered in Austin Texas, which develops, manufactures, sells and supports a wide range of personal computers, servers, data storage devices, network switches, personal digital assistants (PDAs), software, computer peripherals, and more. They design, build and customize products and services to satisfy a range of customer requirements: from the server, storage and Premier Services needs of the largest global corporations, to those of consumers at home. According to the Fortune 500 2006 list, Dell ranks as the 25th-largest company in the United States by revenue.
Capital requirements to set up an assembly line to produce PC's are also relatively low, estimated at roughly a million dollars (Rivkin & Porter,1999 pg. 5) which means that virtually any firm can enter the market easily. Despite sky rocketing demands for PC's, PC producers are unable to capitalize due to increasing number of competitors. The PC industry is also affected by environmental turbulence due to price fluctuations of its components. Constant innovation in PC technology causes older components to be rendered obsolete and prices of older versions to plummet. PC producers who are stuck with inventory of obsolete products incur high costs of dumping these components.
The ASUS Company of strengths are strong R&D department focusing on new advancement, innovative product building, ASUS operates around 50 service sites across countries and has over 400 service partners worldwide. Besides that, there are excellent market leadership and strong relationship with customers. Weaknesses of the ASUS Company are breaking business partnership in Smartphone with Garmin, over dependence on few customers and limited market share. Furthermore, high tax structure, high competitive market and high loan rates are possible are the weaknesses of the company. Moreover, opportunities of ASUS Company are hue emerging market still to penetrate for computers, demand of smartphone increasing, strategic acquisitions and alliances. Outlook for PC shipment, and growing economy still counted the opportunities of ASUS Company. Last but not least, threats of ASUS Company are geopolitical risk for ASUS Computers, decreasing demand of Netbooks and laptops, low profit margins and technology becoming obsolete. There have global economic turndown, unexpected problems and increasing rates of
As director of Supply Chain Systems, I have decided to implement the new supply chain strategy of Virtual Integration, and model its supply chain after companies like Dell. Although there are several key differences between the companies, Dell’s direct business approach can be applied to every facet of Ford’s operation. Special care will need to be taken to address the unique dependency of our custom “tier- one” suppliers. A modification of the virtual integration system currently used by Dell could be applied to Ford’s dependent supplier base, while the management of lower tier suppliers of general or generic components would be more effectively suited by the standard procedures used by Dell.
Dell Inc. weakness was cell manufacturing because their assembled computers were being shipped five to six days after the order was placed. It is an inconvenience for the customers to always send their computer away to have it repaired. First, they are left without internet access. Second, the time it reaches Austin, Texas, have it repaired, and shipped back can take days. The company opportunities were the Dell U.K. that open business in 1987 and in that country it was a lot of companies selling cheap computers. Dell Inc. strides on loyalty among customers and employees, and that could only be derived from having the highest level of service and performing products. Segmentation within the company enables them to measure the efficiency of the business in terms of assets use. Dell Inc. evaluates their return on invested capital in each segment, compare it with other segments, and target what the performance of each should be.
“The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention argues that no two countries that are both part of the same global supply chain will ever fight a war as long as they are each part of that supply chain.” (Friedman 170) The supply chain, being the complex system in which we transfer parts and other things throughout the world in order to build a finished product. Thomas Friedman gives an example of the supply chain with his experience of getting a computer built by Dell in Emerging: Contemporary Reading for Writers. This sets the groundwork for Friedman’s theory and also the McDonald’s Theory of Conflict Prevention. The McDonald’s Theory and the Dell Theory are of the same skeleton, both have the same premise and try to both play on your emotions. The
It can be argued that a corporate philosophy, value or mission statement can aid in a company’s ability to distinguish itself and standout against competitors. In addition, statements such as these can prove to be an effective medium in the improvement of employee performance and behavior (Seong, 2011). In the early 2000’s as Dell experienced a drop in market share, CEO Michael Dell turned to The Soul of Dell as a way to mend the corporation’s culture and recapture a stronghold on the industry. Dell’s philosophy statement was created in hopes that it would transform the existing incentive-oriented culture to one which adhered to the newly established key standards and principles of the company. Unfortunately, as Dell would find, the company’s vision for improvement failed to make an impression on employees.
Dell’s initial competitive strategy, when it was founded in 1984 by Michael Dell, was to focus mainly on differentiation. Its strategy was to sell customised personal computer systems directly to customers, which was a rapidly emerging market at that time (1). This was done by targeting second-time customers, those that already understand computers and know what they wanted. Meanwhile other companies at the time was selling “’plain brown wrapper’ computers” (2). By offering customisations, Dell gained a better understanding of customers’ needs and wants. This helped the organisation position itself differently against the more popular brands, such as Compaq and IBM.
“The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention,” is a theory that is approved by multiple famous authors. The theories main points are valuable and the theory should be looked upon more seriously. In Thomas Friedman’s essay, “The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention,” he gives examples of how global supply chains would be constructive to promoting world peace. Friedman feels that if everyone is an ally to each other in some shape or form, then no one will want to engage in war. Madeline Albright would agree with Friedman’s theory according to her writings in “Faith and Diplomacy.” Albright felt that religion should play a factor in the diplomatic system of America, in order for us to maintain some kind of peace with other nations. Friedman and Albright both were looking for a solution to world peace. Albright would agree with this theory from the religious perspective. Appiah argued that an ideal global citizen would be essential to America, in his essays “Making conversation” and “The Primacy of Practice.” Appiah felt that people must have an understanding of each other in order to get along with each other. Both Appiah and Albright would agree with “The Dell Theory of Conflict Prevention.” “The Dell Theory stipulates: No two countries that are both part of a major global supply chain, like Dell’s, will ever fight a war against each other as long as they are both part of the same global supply chain”(Friedman 125).